Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2023; 11(14): 3187-3194
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3187
Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3187
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the three patient groups (mean ± SD, n)
Group | Age (yr) | Gender (male/female) | Equivalent sphere diameter (D) | Mean refraction (D) |
Group A (n = 60) | 36.45 ± 3.78 | 22/38 | -1.78 ± 2.21 | -0.44 ± 1.56 |
Group B (n = 66) | 35.48 ± 3.24 | 30/36 | -2.16 ± 2.15 | 0.65 ± 2.45 |
Group C (n = 70) | 36.15 ± 3.12 | 36/34 | -2.57 ± 2.45 | -1.05 ± 2.15 |
F/χ2 value | 1.384 | 2.858 | 1.949 | 1.430 |
P value | 0.253 | 0.240 | 0.145 | 0.242 |
Table 2 Comparison of contrast sensitivity, color vision, and best-corrected visual acuity levels among three groups (mean ± SD, n)
Table 3 Comparison of weekly parameters in the three groups (mean ± SD, n)
Group | Optic cup area (mm) | Optic disc area (mm) | Cup/disc area ratio | Cup/disc diameter ratio |
Group A (n = 60) | 1.02 ± 0.81 | 2.82 ± 0.88 | 0.34 ± 0.21 | 0.56 ± 0.05 |
Group B (n = 66) | 1.31 ± 0.75a | 3.87 ± 0.87a | 0.37 ± 0.22 | 0.61 ± 0.06a |
Group C (n = 70) | 1.42 ± 0.65a | 3.45 ± 0.75a,b | 0.35 ± 0.18 | 0.59 ± 0.04a,b |
F value | 4.890 | 25.691 | 0.369 | 15.672 |
P value | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.692 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in each of the three groups (mean ± SD, n)
Group | Complete cycle (μm) | Upper quadrant (μm) | Lower quadrant (μm) | Temporal side (μm) | nasal side (μm) |
Group A (n = 60) | 109.12 ± 10.54 | 133.23 ± 7.87 | 130.23 ±5.54 | 111.23 ± 5.36 | 60.45 ± 3.45 |
Group B (n = 66) | 102.78 ± 9.23a | 125.65 ± 7.54a | 121.32 ± 5.45a | 123.45 ± 5.21a | 56.45 ± 2.98a |
Group C (n = 70) | 106.45 ± 10.21a,b | 129.87 ± 8.56a,b | 127.63 ± 5.78a,b | 115.46 ± 5.14a,b | 58.45 ± 2.12a,b |
F value | 4.212 | 14.177 | 42.888 | 89.611 | 30.552 |
P value | 0.016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 5 Comparison of mean ganglion cell layer thickness and general loss of volume and focal loss of volume in the three groups (mean ± SD, n)
Group | Upper GCC (μm) | Bottom GCC (μm) | Mean GCC (μm) | GLV (%) | FLV (%) |
Group A (n = 60) | 94.15 ± 6.78 | 92.45 ± 7.45 | 92.56 ± 7.45 | 5.16 ± 4.12 | 1.36 ± 1.12 |
Group B (n = 66) | 71.45 ± 6.56a | 78.26 ± 11.65a | 73.66 ± 8.12a | 23.15 ± 8.97a | 7.54 ± 4.85a |
Group C (n = 70) | 83.54 ± 5.54a,b | 82.64 ± 8.78a,b | 82.43 ± 8.26a,b | 15.05 ± 8.78a,b | 3.88 ± 2.56a,b |
F value | 205.836 | 36.474 | 88.326 | 85.061 | 57.448 |
P value | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Citation: Mu H, Li RS, Yin Z, Feng ZL. Value of optical coherence tomography measurement of macular thickness and optic disc parameters for glaucoma screening in patients with high myopia. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(14): 3187-3194
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i14/3187.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3187