Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 6, 2023; 11(10): 2246-2253
Published online Apr 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2246
Table 1 Magnetic resonance imaging results of the left ventricular function
Group
Participants
LVEF, %
LVESV, mL
LVEDV, mL
Observation9744.19 ± 9.7188.51 ± 17.52147.32 ± 18.32
Control 9366.92 ± 10.2333.64 ± 10.23100.03 ± 23.19
t value15.71326.21515.613
P value0.0000.0000.000
Table 2 Left ventricular stress test results
Groups
Participants
LS, %
CS, %
RS, %
Observation 97-11.21 ± 3.87-14.85 ± 5.9631.44 ± 10.45
Control 93-15.43 ± 2.42-19.83 ± 4.0945.43 ± 6.12
t value8.9696.68411.194
P value0.0000.0000.000
Table 3 Interaction between the left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular strain
Independent variable
Model
R2
LSy = -2.5269x + 17.2850.9805
CSy = -1.6514x + 21.4620.9836
RSy = 0.9325x + 16.3560.9848
Table 4 Left ventricular function of participants with different degrees of coronary stenosis
Gensini score
Participants
LVEF, %
LVESV, mL
LVEDV, mL
< 5 1254.93 ± 8.1270.94 ± 15.34125.49 ± 17.43
5–< 25 4145.67 ± 7.9285.21 ± 17.83142.85 ± 12.93
≥ 25–< 603640.88 ± 8.8795.09 ± 13.21155.93 ± 16.54
≥ 60 835.39 ± 9.05102.17 ± 11.09164.23 ± 13.82
F value11.75510.02717.025
P value0.0000.0000.000