Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2021; 9(23): 6810-6815
Published online Aug 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i23.6810
Nedaplatin-induced syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone: A case report and review of the literature
Lei Tian, Li-Ya He, Hong-Zhen Zhang, Department of Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei Province, China
ORCID number: Lei Tian (0000-0001-8097-3301); Li-Ya He (0000-0001-6135-8960); Hong-Zhen Zhang (0000-0003-3226-9744).
Author contributions: Tian L reviewed the literature and wrote the manuscript; He LY was the patient’s doctor in charge; Zhang HZ contributed to the literature review; and all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Hong-Zhen Zhang, PhD, Doctor, Department of Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, No. 348 Heping West Road, Shijiazhuang 050051, China. 1256596529@qq.com
Received: February 1, 2021
Peer-review started: February 1, 2021
First decision: April 25, 2021
Revised: May 6, 2021
Accepted: May 19, 2021
Article in press: May 19, 2021
Published online: August 16, 2021

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) is relatively common in several cancers, such as small cell lung cancer. However, nedaplatin-induced SIADH is rare. We describe a case of SIADH mediated by nedaplatin.

CASE SUMMARY

A 54-year-old female with nasopharyngeal carcinoma was treated with nedaplatin and developed severe hyponatremia due to SIADH. The side effects were successfully treated by fluid restriction and sodium supplementation.

CONCLUSION

This case report highlights the importance of cautiously treating life-threatening hyponatremia in patients treated with nedaplatin.

Key Words: Nedaplatin, Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone, Hyponatremia, Fluid restriction, Sodium supplementation, Case report

Core Tip: Nedaplatin has been shown to be an effective drug in a variety of cancers. Due to its wide application, it is important to pay attention to its side effects, especially rare side effects. Here, we report a case of a severe, rare syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone after initiating nedaplatin chemotherapy. Timely diagnosis, fluid restriction and sodium supplementation may be the most appropriate treatments.



INTRODUCTION

Nedaplatin is a second-generation platinum medication that was developed in Japan in 1983. Its antitumor mechanism is similar to that of cisplatin—binding with DNA, inhibiting the growth of tumor cells and producing antitumor activity[1]. It has been widely used for the treatment of head and neck, lung, esophageal, bladder, and gynecological cancers and many other malignancies[2-4]. The dose-limiting toxicity of nedaplatin is myelosuppression, and other common adverse reactions include gastrointestinal symptoms, kidney dysfunction, ototoxicity and alopecia[3,5]. Rare complications, such as hypersensitivity reactions and Adams-Stokes syndrome, have also been reported in clinical practice[6]. We report the case of a rare, severe side effect of nedaplatin: syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH).

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

A 54-year-old female was admitted to our hospital in November 2020 with a 1-year history of nasal congestion, tinnitus, and hearing loss.

History of present illness

One year before admission, the patient had nasal congestion, tinnitus, and hearing loss. She had no dizziness or syncope. She was admitted to a local hospital and treated with antibiotics. Due to persistence of her symptoms, the patient was referred to our hospital for further assessment.

History of past illness

Her past medical history included hypertension.

Personal and family history

There was no family history of malignancy or any other family history.

Physical examination

Upon physical examination, multiple enlarged lymph nodes fused in the bilateral neck were observed. The largest was approximately 30 mm × 20 mm and located at level II of the right neck.

Laboratory examinations

Routine blood examination, coagulation function, urinalysis results, stool analysis, liver chemistry tests, urea, creatinine, uric acid and electrocardiogram results were all within normal limits. Her serum electrolytes were as follows: Sodium 134 mmol/L, potassium 3.8 mmol/L, chloride 93 mmol/L, calcium 2.53 mmol/L, magnesium 0.73 mmol/L and phosphorus 1.50 mmol/L.

Imaging examinations

A magnetic resonance imaging scan of the neck revealed a lesion (51 mm × 28 mm × 40 mm) that occupied the posterior wall of the nasopharynx (Figure 1). A computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest showed multiple nodules, that were possibly metastases (Figure 2). There were no lesions on CT scans of the head and abdomen, and bone scans were normal.

Figure 1
Figure 1  Neck magnetic resonance imaging revealed nasopharyngeal lesions along with bilateral cervical lymph node metastases.
Figure 2
Figure 2  Chest computed tomography showed multiple lung metastases.
Pathologic findings

A nasopharyngeal biopsy confirmed a histopathological diagnosis of non-keratogenic carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was positive for creatine kinase (CK), epidermal growth factor receptor, P40, P63, CK19 and CK5/6 and negative for Vim, S-100, leukocyte common antigen and CD34, which is consistent with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (Figure 3). In situ hybridization showed Epstein-Barr encoding region (-).

Figure 3
Figure 3  Immunohistochemistry of tumor sample.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

She was diagnosed with NPC, with a classification of clinical stage IV.

TREATMENT

According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, the patient received 1 cycle of chemotherapy with docetaxel and nedaplatin on November 25, 2020. The doses of docetaxel and nedaplatin were 75 mg/m2 (day 1) and 80 mg/m2 (days 1–3), respectively. She had sudden-onset convulsions, palpitations and sweating four days after nedaplatin initiation. On examination, she was hemodynamically stable and afebrile, with a heart rate of 86 bpm, blood pressure 152/113 mmHg, respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min, and oxygen saturation of 100% on room air. Her lungs were clear, and an abdominal exam was unremarkable. An electrocardiogram showed no acute pathologic processes. Her serum electrolytes were as follows: sodium 120 mmol/L, potassium 3.0 mmol/L, chloride 77 mmol/L, calcium 2.16 mmol/L, magnesium 0.57 mmol/L and phosphorus 1.05 mmol/L. Her blood urea nitrogen and creatinine were 4.32 mmol/L and 40.9 µmol/L, respectively. Serum osmolality was 257 mOsm/kg, with a urine osmolality of 570 mOsm/kg and urine sodium of 144 mmol/L. Her urinalysis was unremarkable. Thyroid-stimulating hormone, blood glucose, cholesterol, adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol stimulation tests were normal. These findings were consistent with SIADH.

She was treated with fluid restriction, and approximately 12 g of sodium was intravenously administered. Oral sodium replacement therapy was initiated at 3 g daily. Two days later (December 1, 2020), she experienced convulsions and sweating again, and her serum sodium had decreased to 108 mmol/L. Stricter fluid restriction (< 1200 mL/d) and more sodium were administered (20 g of sodium was intravenously administered, and 6 g of sodium was given orally daily). The trend in sodium level is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4
Figure 4  The trend in sodium level.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Serum sodium levels gradually returned to within normal limits approximately 1 wk after initial presentation. Intravenous and oral sodium supplementation were discontinued approximately 2 wk later without sequelae.

DISCUSSION

In our patient, other possible causes of hyponatremia included inappetence and vomiting attributed to chemotherapy, but she had no clinical signs of dehydration or obvious digestive symptoms. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reactions Probability Scale (NADRPS) is widely used to evaluate the relationship between drugs and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). NADRPS involves 10 ‘yes,’ ‘no,’ or ‘unknown or non-applicable’ questions. The ADR is assigned to a probability category on the basis of the total score of ‘definite’ ≥ 9; ‘likely’, 5-8; ‘possible’, 1-4; and ‘unlikely’, ≤ 0. For nedaplatin-induced SIADH, the results are shown in Table 1. The total score was 7, and the causality was assessed as ‘likely’.

Table 1 Naranjo’s assessment scale for adverse drug reactions.
Axis
Numerical score
Yes
No
Unknown
Previous reports on the reaction1
The reaction occurred after the use of nedaplatin2
Sodium increased after nedaplatin withdrawal1
Nedaplatin rechallenge0
Exclusion of alternative causes of SIADH2
Placebo response0
Drug concentration and monitoring0
Dose relationship0
Previous exposure and cross-reactivity0
Presence of any objective evidence1
Results7 = ‘likely’

SIADH was first described by Schwartz et al[7] in 1957. The diagnostic criteria for SIADH include serum Na < 135 mmol/L, serum osmolarity < 275 mOsm/kg, urine Na > 40 mEq/L, and urine concentration > 100 mOsm/kg. There was no evidence of hyper- or hypovolemia or diuretics usage. The functions of the thyroid, adrenal glands, heart, liver, and kidneys were normal[8]. The most frequent causes of SIADH include malignancies, lung diseases, central nervous system disorders and different kinds of drugs, especially anticancer medications, such as cyclophosphamide and platinum compounds[8,9].

Cisplatin-induced SIADH is more common than nedaplatin-induced SIADH[10-12]. To date, SIADH following the use of nedaplatin has only been reported by several Japanese authors[13,14]. In 2001, Iwabuchi et al[13] described a case of nedaplatin-induced SIADH in a patient with mandibular gingival cancer. Subsequently, it has been reported in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer[14]. In both cases, nedaplatin was combined with 5-fluorouracil, which differed from our patient.

Nedaplatin-induced SIADH is rare. Due to the small number of cases, the mechanism for nedaplatin-induced SIADH remains unclear, but the condition may be life-threatening. We report this case to highlight the importance of monitoring the plasma sodium concentration in patients treated with nedaplatin.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we report an extremely rare side effect of nedaplatin: SIADH. Treatment options include fluid restriction and sodium supplementation. Considering the lethality of severe hyponatremia, it should be taken seriously.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript

Specialty type: Oncology

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Raj R S-Editor: Wang JL L-Editor: Webster JR P-Editor: Liu JH

References
1.  Zhou J, Kang Y, Chen L, Wang H, Liu J, Zeng S, Yu L. The Drug-Resistance Mechanisms of Five Platinum-Based Antitumor Agents. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:343.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 104]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 208]  [Article Influence: 52.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Chen NB, Li QW, Li S, Guo SP, Wu YJ, Cheng ZJ, Li JB, Wang DQ, Liu FJ, Ai XL, Hu N, Qiu B, Liu H. Docetaxel and nedaplatin twice a week with concurrent definitive radiotherapy in inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A phase I trial (GASTO-1021). Radiother Oncol. 2021;155:105-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Tang LQ, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Huang Y, Guo SS, Qi B, Tang QN, Wang P, Li XY, Li JB, Liu Q, Gao YH, Xie FY, Liu LT, Li Y, Liu SL, Xie HJ, Liang YJ, Sun XS, Yan JJ, Wu YS, Luo DH, Huang PY, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Chen MY, Lv X, Wang L, Xia WX, Zhao C, Cao KJ, Qian CN, Guo X, Hong MH, Nie ZQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:461-473.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 75]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82]  [Article Influence: 13.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Chikazawa K, Netsu S, Imai K, Ishiguro A, Kimura A, Wang L, Kuwata T, Konno R. Nedaplatin use in patients with hypersensitivity reaction episodes to carboplatin. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59:546-550.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Zhong LZ, Xu HY, Zhao ZM, Zhang GM, Lin FW. Comparison of efficacy and toxicity between nedaplatin and cisplatin in treating malignant pleural effusion. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:5509-5512.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Kawarada Y, Miyazaki M, Itoh A, Araki R, Iwamizu H, Kataoka T, Kumakura Y, Ota A, Nagai T, Yamada K. Incidence of and risk factors associated with nedaplatin-related hypersensitivity reactions. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017;22:593-599.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  SCHWARTZ WB, BENNETT W, CURELOP S, BARTTER FC. A syndrome of renal sodium loss and hyponatremia probably resulting from inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. Am J Med. 1957;23:529-542.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 752]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 789]  [Article Influence: 11.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Fernández Miró M, Marin Arguedas S, Ferrer Ruscalleda L. [Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion associated with a SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia]. Med Clin (Barc). 2021;156:195-196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Krishnamurthy A, Bhattacharya S, Lathia T, Kantroo V, Kalra S, Dutta D. Anticancer Medications and Sodium Dysmetabolism. Eur Endocrinol. 2020;16:122-130.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Abid H, Siddiqui N, Gnanajothy R. Severe Hyponatremia Due to Cisplatin-induced Syndrome of Inappropriate Secretion of Antidiuretic Hormone. Cureus. 2019;11:e5458.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Tan AC, Marx GM. Cisplatin-induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) with life-threatening hyponatraemia. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Ohtaka M, Hattori Y, Kumano Y, Maeda Y, Kondo T, Mochizuki T, Kawahara T, Teranishi J, Miyoshi Y, Yumura Y, Uemura H. [Severe Hyponatremia after Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy : Two Case Reports]. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2016;62:361-366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Iwabuchi H, Takamori K, Honma H, Asanami S, Tanaka Y. [A case of mandibular gingival cancer T4N0M0 which markedly responded to a combined therapy of nedaplatin with 5-fluorouracil]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2001;28:1273-1276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Matsuda Y, Lee S, Kishida S, Mori K, Isohata N, Iwasaki H, Hashiba R, Gyobu K, Osugi H. [A case of SIADH developed during neoadjuvant chemotherapy using nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil in a patient with esophageal cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2010;37:1787-1790.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]