Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2020; 8(15): 3240-3248
Published online Aug 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3240
Published online Aug 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3240
Surgical outcomes of bladder augmentation: A comparison of three different augmentation procedures
Xiao-Gang Sun, Jian Wang, Ai-Wu Li, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China
Xiao-Gang Sun, Ruo-Yi Wang, Jia-Long Xu, Dian-Guo Li, Wei-Xiu Chen, Jin-Liang Li, Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, China
Author contributions: Li AW and Wang J conceived and designed the analysis; Wang RY and Li DG collected the data; Chen WX and Li JL contributed to the data collection; Xu JL performed the statistical analyses; Sun XG wrote the paper.
Institutional review board statement: The ethics approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University.
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained from the patients.
Conflict-of-interest statement: No conflict-of-interest.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ai-Wu Li, PhD, Professor, Surgeon, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 107 Wenhua Western Road, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China. 18753107030@163.com
Received: March 25, 2020
Peer-review started: March 25, 2020
First decision: April 22, 2020
Revised: May 1, 2020
Accepted: July 4, 2020
Article in press: July 4, 2020
Published online: August 6, 2020
Processing time: 133 Days and 21.6 Hours
Peer-review started: March 25, 2020
First decision: April 22, 2020
Revised: May 1, 2020
Accepted: July 4, 2020
Article in press: July 4, 2020
Published online: August 6, 2020
Processing time: 133 Days and 21.6 Hours
Core Tip
Core tip: We performed a retrospective review of the mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing different bladder augmentation procedures for neurogenic bladder in a single institution. We studied a total of 96 patients who underwent one of the following augmentation cystoplasty procedures: Standard cystoplasty (SC), auto-augmentation (AA), and seromuscular cystoplasty lined with urothelium (SCLU). We found that SC provided sufficient bladder capacity and improved compliance with acceptable complications. Bladder capacity and compliance improved with a high rate of re-augmentation after AA and SCLU. Compared with AA, SCLU did not have better postoperative urodynamic parameters.