Published online Dec 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i35.12909
Peer-review started: July 10, 2022
First decision: August 4, 2022
Revised: September 12, 2022
Accepted: November 14, 2022
Article in press: November 14, 2022
Published online: December 16, 2022
Processing time: 156 Days and 17.3 Hours
Increased lipoprotein (a) [lp (a)] has proinflammatory effects, which increase the risk of coronary artery disease. However, the association between lp (a) variability and follow-up C-reactive protein (CRP) level in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been investigated.
To explore the association between lp (a) variability and mean CRP levels within the 1st year post-PCI.
Results of lp (a) and CRP measurements from at least three follow-up visits of patients who had received PCI were retrospectively analyzed. Standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and variability independent of the mean (VIM) are presented for the variability for lp (a) and linear regression analysis was conducted to correlate lp (a) variability and mean follow-up CRP level. The relationship of lp (a) variability and inflammation status was analyzed by restricted cubic spline analysis. Finally, exploratory analysis was performed to test the consistency of results in different populations.
A total of 2712 patients were enrolled. Patients with higher variability of lp (a) had a higher level of mean follow-up CRP (P < 0.001). lp (a) variability was positively correlated with the mean follow-up CRP (SD: β = 0.023, P < 0.001; CV: β = 0.929, P < 0.001; VIM: β = 1.648, P < 0.001) by multivariable linear regression analysis. Exploratory analysis showed that the positive association remained consistent in most subpopulations.
Lp (a) variability correlated with mean follow-up CRP level and high variability could be considered an independent risk factor for increased post-PCI CRP level.
Core Tip: In this study, we determined the predictive value of lipoprotein (a) [lp (a)] variability for the C-reactive protein (CRP) level during the 1-year of follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One of the main strengths is the large sample size of the study. Additionally we used multiple measures to methods to validate our results. In this multicenter retrospective study, the variability of lp (a) was closely correlated with the average follow-up CRP levels, and high lp (a) variability could be considered an independent risk factor for increased CRP levels during follow-up visits for patients treated with PCI.