Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2021; 9(27): 8027-8034
Published online Sep 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8027
Published online Sep 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8027
Table 1 Comparison of image quality scores between two-dimensional ultrasonography and three-dimensional ultrasonography (mean ± SD, points)
Group | Number | Sulcus, fissure, and gyrus display | Choroid plexus ependymal display | Blood flow display | Tissue specificity | Resolution | Visual field | Positioning |
Two-dimensional ultrasonography | 113 | 2.53 ± 0.34 | 2.49 ± 0.23 | 2.38 ± 0.30 | 2.44 ± 0.25 | 2.59 ± 0.18 | 2.63 ± 0.21 | 2.85 ± 0.12 |
Three-dimensional ultrasonography | 113 | 1.97 ± 0.30 | 2.12 ± 0.25 | 1.98 ± 0.26 | 2.03 ± 0.20 | 2.31 ± 0.22 | 2.25 ± 0.19 | 2.61 ± 0.14 |
t | 13.129 | 11.578 | 10.711 | 13.613 | 10.471 | 14.264 | 13.836 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 2 Analysis of diagnoses by two-dimensional ultrasonography and three-dimensional ultrasonography
Inspection mode | Results of pathological examination | Total | ||
+ | - | |||
Two-dimensional ultrasonography examination | + | 51 | 8 | 59 |
- | 28 | 26 | 54 | |
Three-dimensional ultrasonography examination | + | 73 | 4 | 77 |
- | 6 | 30 | 36 | |
Total | 79 | 34 | 113 |
Table 3 Diagnostic performance of two-dimensional ultrasonography and three-dimensional ultrasonography diagnosis
Diagnostic mode | Diagnostic sensitivity | Diagnostic specificity | Diagnostic accuracy |
Two-dimensional ultrasonography examination | 64.56% (51/79) | 76.47% (26/34) | 68.14% (77/113) |
Three-dimensional ultrasonography examination | 92.41% (73/79) | 88.24% (30/34) | 91.15% (103/113) |
χ2 | 18.139 | 1.619 | 18.451 |
P value | 0.000 | 0.203 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Analysis of different types of central nervous system malformations detected by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography
Diagnostic mode | Brain perforation malformation | Abnormality of corpus callosum | Meningoencephalocele | Choroidal cyst | Exposed brain malformation | Galen venous hemangioma | Arachnoid cyst | Spina bifida | Hydrocephalus |
Two-dimensional ultrasonography examination | 50.00% (2/4) | 50.00% (2/4) | 60.00% (3/5) | 57.14% (4/7) | 77.78% (7/9) | 72.73% (8/11) | 58.33% (7/12) | 61.54% (8/13) | 71.43% (10/14) |
Three-dimensional ultrasonography examination | 100.00% (4/4) | 75.00% (3/4) | 100.00% (5/5) | 85.71% (6/7) | 88.89% (8/9) | 100.00% (11/11) | 91.67% (11/12) | 92.31% (12/13) | 92.86% (13/14) |
χ2 | 2.667 | 0.533 | 2.500 | 1.400 | 0.400 | 3.474 | 3.556 | 3.467 | 2.191 |
P value | 0.102 | 0.465 | 0.114 | 0.237 | 0.527 | 0.062 | 0.059 | 0.063 | 0.139 |
- Citation: Pang B, Pan JJ, Li Q, Zhang X. Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of fetal central nervous system malformation. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(27): 8027-8034
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i27/8027.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8027