Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2021; 9(20): 5470-5478
Published online Jul 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5470
Published online Jul 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5470
Table 1 Univariate analysis of influential factors for the prognosis of patients with spinal metastatic tumors
Clinical characteristics | n | Survival group, n = 28 | Death group, n = 81 | χ2 value | P value |
Gender | 0.981 | 0.456 | |||
Male | 68 | 16 | 52 | ||
Female | 41 | 12 | 29 | ||
Age in yr | 34.542 | 0.001 | |||
20 to 39 | 23 | 10 | 13 | ||
40 to 59 | 61 | 15 | 46 | ||
60 to 89 | 25 | 3 | 22 | ||
Comorbidity of metastases from elsewhere | 45.890 | 0.001 | |||
Yes | 65 | 7 | 58 | ||
No | 44 | 21 | 23 | ||
Types of primary lesions | 2.342 | 0.108 | |||
Lung cancer | 27 | 8 | 19 | ||
Gastric cancer | 23 | 4 | 19 | ||
Thyroid cancer | 20 | 5 | 15 | ||
Breast cancer | 19 | 7 | 12 | ||
Intestinal cancer | 13 | 3 | 10 | ||
Other cancers | 7 | 1 | 6 | ||
Therapies | 19.221 | 0.001 | |||
Subtotal resection combined with internal fixation and decompression | 60 | 12 | 48 | ||
Minimally invasive percutaneous spine surgery | 49 | 16 | 33 | ||
Number of spinal tumors | 5.762 | 0.041 | |||
1 to 2 | 47 | 16 | 31 | ||
≥ 3 | 62 | 12 | 50 | ||
Patient attitudes toward tumors | 4.093 | 0.046 | |||
Face it positively | 29 | 9 | 20 | ||
Accept it | 41 | 14 | 27 | ||
Deny it | 12 | 2 | 10 | ||
Resist it | 27 | 3 | 24 | ||
Karnofsky performance score | 13.674 | 0.001 | |||
10 to 30 | 6 | 0 | 6 | ||
30 to 50 | 25 | 4 | 21 | ||
50 to 70 | 54 | 10 | 44 | ||
70 to 90 | 24 | 14 | 10 |
Table 2 Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale score in patients with spinal metastatic tumors of different outcomes, n (%)
Groups | n | Time points | Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale score | ||||
Grade A | Grade B | Grade C | Grade D | Grade E | |||
Survival group | 28 | Before surgery | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (7.1) | 5 (17.9) | 21 (75.0) |
1 mo after surgery | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (21.4) | 22 (78.6) | ||
Death group | 81 | Before surgery | 0 (0.0) | 3 (3.7)a | 11 (13.6)a | 21 (5.9)a | 46 (56.8)a |
1 mo after surgery | 15 (18.5)b | 14 (17.3)b | 8 (9.9)b | 23 (28.4) | 21 (25.9)b |
Table 3 Comparison of spinal instability neoplastic score between the survival group and the death group, n (%)
Groups | n | SINS score, points | ||
1 to 6 | 7 to 12 | 13 to 18 | ||
Survival group | 28 | 12 (42.8) | 13 (46.4) | 3 (10.7) |
Death group | 81 | 11 (13.6) | 61 (75.3) | 9 (11.1) |
χ2 value | 8.125 | 13.098 | 0.542 | |
P value | 0.015 | 0.009 | 0.761 |
Table 4 Differences in the revised Tokuhashi score between the survival group and the death group, n (%)
Groups | n | Revised Tokuhashi score, points | ||
0 to 8 | 9 to 11 | 12 to 15 | ||
Survival group | 28 | 6 (21.4) | 10 (35.7) | 12 (42.8) |
Death group | 81 | 34 (42.0) | 36 (44.4) | 11 (13.6) |
χ2 value | 11.153 | 5.327 | 16.542 | |
P value | 0.001 | 0.041 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Gao QP, Yang DZ, Yuan ZB, Guo YX. Prognostic factors and its predictive value in patients with metastatic spinal cancer. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(20): 5470-5478
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i20/5470.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5470