Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2023; 11(5): 1009-1018
Published online Feb 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.1009
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients
Characteristic
T2DM at baseline, n = 196
Non-T2DM at baseline, n = 216
P value
Age in yr55 (50-62)54 (49-62)0.090
Female sex69 (35.2)72 (33.3)0.690
Smoking status98 (50.0)125 (57.9)0.114
Alcohol abuse status76 (38.8)74 (34.3)0.358
Dyslipidemia64 (32.7)58 (26.9)0.235
Ascites9 (4.6)15 (6.9)0.400
Esophagogastric varices6 (3.1)12 (5.6)0.238
PT10.4 (9.6-11.3)11.8 (10.8-14.1)< 0.001
INR0.94 (0.87-1.01)1.05 (0.96-1.24)< 0.001
AST in IU/mL25 (20-38)27 (20-45)0.389
ALT in IU/mL26 (19-34)28 (20-44)0.101
Platelet count as × 109/ L177 (132-203)161 (112-207)0.105
AFP in ng/mL1.24 (0.56-20.83)2.36 (1.53-25.00)0.761
GGT in U/L29 (17-58)33 (19-80)0.062
Total bilirubin in μmol/L15.0 (10.5-18.5)15.1 (11.1-24.9)0.096
Albumin in g/L39.7 (33.1-42.8)37.8 (32.3-41.0)0.090
MELD score6 (5-8)6 (5-10)0.191
HBsAg in log IU/mL2.50 (1.91-2.68)2.64 (2.22-2.69)0.104
HBV DNA in IU/mL19500 (1260-234000)23850 (8738-329000)0.936
Creatinine in µmol/L60 (52-74)61 (50-74)0.379
HBeAg positivity50 (25.5)56 (24.1)0.727
Antiviral treatment137 (69.9)144 (66.7)0.526
Duration of T2DM in yr
0-2.044 (22.4)
2.1-5.042 (21.4)
5.1-10.052 (26.5)
> 10.058 (29.6)
T2DM treatment
Metformin ± sulfonylurea112 (57.1)
Insulin ± sulfonylurea50 (25.5)
Diet alone34 (17.3)
Table 2 Cox regression analysis of factors related to hepatocarcinogenesis in the patients
VariableUnivariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age in yr, > 65 vs ≤ 651.16 (0.63, 2.10)0.6491.38 (0.62, 3.11)0.434
Sex, male vs female4.37 (1.98, 9.64)< 0.0013.47 (1.36, 8.89)0.010
Smoking status, yes vs no1.97 (1.15, 3.38)0.0131.46 (0.61, 3.45)0.394
Alcohol abuse status, yes vs no1.83 (0.44, 2.55)0.5581.38 (0.80, 1.68)0.008
Dyslipidemia, yes vs no1.58 (0.30, 2.09)0.0900.80 (0.36, 1.79)0.589
Diabetes mellitus, yes vs no2.54 (1.41, 4.59)0.0026.73 (2.77, 16.36)< 0.001
Ascites, yes vs no2.68 (1.20, 5.98)0.0161.41 (0.31, 6.43)0.660
Esophagogastric varices, yes vs no1.20 (0.37, 3.87)0.7660.62 (0.13, 2.97)0.552
AFP in ng/mL, > 20 vs ≤ 201.85 (0.98, 3.51)0.0593.89 (1.06, 14.27)0.041
γ-GTP in U/L, per SD1.24 (0.52, 2.14)0.6921.34 (0.75, 3.21)0.530
HBsAg, > 2.0 log IU/mL vs ≤ 2.0 log IU/mL1.74 (0.43, 2.28)0.2774.10 (1.52, 11.12)0.005
HBV DNA, ≤ 20000 IU/mL vs > 20000 IU/mL0.46 (0.20, 1.07)0.0721.09 (0.38, 3.15)0.877
HBeAg positivity, yes vs no0.59 (0.28, 1.28)0.1810.54 (0.20, 1.49)0.236
Antiviral treatment, yes vs no0.27 (0.16, 2.14)0.3650.74 (0.33, 1.67)0.475
Table 3 Factors correlated with hepatocarcinogenesis in the type 2 diabetes mellitus group
Variable
HR
95%CI
P value
Age > 65 yr23.544.59-120.74< 0.001
Male sex3.641.01-13.200.049
Smoking3.100.85-11.380.088
Alcohol abuse0.380.11-1.310.125
Dyslipidemia1.560.50-4.850.440
Ascites0.500.07-3.600.489
Esophagogastric varices0.540.05-6.340.623
AFP > 20 ng/mL17.442.86-106.230.002
γ-GTP in U/L, per SD2.311.55-14.010.762
HBsAg > 2.0 log IU/mL11.932.82-50.410.001
HBV DNA > 20000 IU/mL0.390.09-1.600.190
HBeAg positivity0.960.29-3.110.941
Antiviral treatment0.190.06-0.640.007
T2DM duration in yr
≤ 5---
> 56.742.36-19.29< 0.001
T2DM therapy
Yes/metformin ± sulfonylurea---
Yes/insulin ± sulfonylurea1.450.26-7.960.041
Yes/diet control only10.702.91-39.31< 0.001