Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2023; 11(24): 5678-5691
Published online Aug 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5678
Published online Aug 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5678
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data of participants in four groups
Baseline data | Grade 1 hypertension experimental group (n = 40) | Grade 2 hypertension experimental group (n = 40) | Grade 3 hypertension experimental group (n = 40) | Control group (n = 40) | Statistical values | P value | |
Age (yr) | < 60 | 31 | 29 | 30 | 28 | χ2 = 0.646 | 0.886 |
≥ 60 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 12 | |||
Sex | Male | 28 | 25 | 23 | 25 | χ2 = 1.369 | 0.713 |
Female | 12 | 15 | 17 | 15 | |||
Combined diabetes | Yes | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 | χ2 = 0.387 | 0.946 |
No | 30 | 32 | 31 | 30 | |||
BMI (kg/m2) | ≤ 24 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 13 | χ2 = 0.300 | 0.960 |
> 24 | 25 | 26 | 25 | 27 | |||
Smoking history | Yes | 12 | 10 | 12 | 11 | χ2 = 0.340 | 0.952 |
No | 28 | 30 | 28 | 29 | |||
Drinking history | Yes | 10 | 11 | 13 | 11 | χ2 = 0.587 | 0.899 |
No | 30 | 29 | 27 | 29 | |||
NYHA cardiac functional classification | Grade I | 33 | 31 | 32 | 33 | Z = 0.588 | 0.557 |
Grade II | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | |||
Grade III | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |||
Grade IV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Course of hypertension (mean ± SD, yr) | 5.25 ± 2.15 | 5.35 ± 2.25 | 5.47 ± 2.17 | - | F = 0.110 | 0.896 |
Table 2 Comparison of expression of relevant indicators of inflammation and vascular endothelial injury among the four groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Number of patients | hs-CRP (mmol/L) | TM (μg/L) |
Grade 1 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 2.05 ± 0.85 | 20.15 ± 1.05 |
Grade 2 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 4.15 ± 1.05 | 22.85 ± 1.35 |
Grade 3 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 5.45 ± 1.20 | 26.12 ± 2.25 |
Control group | 40 | 1.72 ± 0.32 | 5.41 ± 1.20 |
F value | - | 149.720 | 1420.213 |
P value | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of hemorheological indexes among the four groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Number of cases | Hct (%) | ESR (mm/h) |
Grade 1 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 40.85 ± 3.15 | 30.25 ± 5.85 |
Grade 2 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 41.25 ± 3.45 | 42.15 ± 6.25 |
Grade 3 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 43.25 ± 4.25 | 60.15 ± 8.15 |
Control group | 40 | 39.56 ± 2.85 | 25.12 ± 5.05 |
F value | - | 7.810 | 234.107 |
P value | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of platelet-related indicators among the four groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Number of patients | CD62P (%) | PLT (× 109) |
Grade 1 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 8.85 ± 1.18 | 115.68 ± 40.15 |
Grade 2 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 11.12 ± 1.35 | 108.56 ± 35.85 |
Grade 3 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 13.10 ± 1.75 | 95.25 ± 30.12 |
Control group | 40 | 6.25 ± 1.05 | 135.25 ± 50.12 |
F value | - | 190.280 | 7.052 |
P value | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of coagulation related indicators among the four groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Number of patients | APTT (s) | PT (s) | TT (s) | FIB (g/L) |
Grade 1 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 29.25 ± 2.71b | 11.98 ± 0.50b | 15.95 ± 1.08b | 3.20 ± 0.51b |
Grade 2 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 27.25 ± 2.24a | 10.82 ± 0.92a | 15.01 ± 0.89a | 5.12 ± 0.68a |
Grade 3 hypertension experimental group | 40 | 25.42 ± 1.52a | 10.02 ± 0.34a | 14.02 ± 0.65a | 6.19 ± 1.15a |
Control group | 40 | 30.12 ± 2.65 | 12.31 ± 0.52 | 16.08 ± 1.12 | 3.01 ± 0.42 |
F value | - | 315.25 | 105.522 | 174.218 | 82.151 |
P value | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Logistic regression analysis of the above indicators and prethrombotic state of primary hypertension
Variable | B | SE | Wals | P value | OR value | 95%CI | |
Upper limit | Lower limit | ||||||
Constant | -2.717 | 0.665 | 16.720 | < 0.001 | 0.066 | - | - |
hs-CRP | 1.535 | 0.307 | 25.086 | < 0.001 | 4.643 | 2.546 | 8.468 |
TM | 0.684 | 0.248 | 7.584 | 0.006 | 1.982 | 1.218 | 3.226 |
Hct | 0.184 | 0.058 | 10.219 | 0.001 | 1.202 | 1.074 | 1.346 |
ESR | 0.226 | 0.042 | 29.282 | < 0.001 | 1.254 | 1.155 | 1.361 |
CD62P | 2.261 | 0.486 | 21.684 | < 0.001 | 9.592 | 3.704 | 24.842 |
PLT | 0.017 | 0.005 | 12.958 | < 0.001 | 1.017 | 1.008 | 1.027 |
APTT | 0.716 | 0.128 | 11.664 | < 0.001 | 1.926 | 1.421 | 2.158 |
PT | 0.805 | 0.148 | 15.660 | < 0.001 | 2.192 | 1.605 | 2.840 |
TT | 0.924 | 0.108 | 13.348 | < 0.001 | 2.490 | 1.808 | 3.418 |
FIB | 5.212 | 0.863 | 19.566 | < 0.001 | 88.423 | 18.137 | 427.013 |
Table 7 Efficacy analysis of each indicator in predicting primary hypertension
Indicator | AUC | 95%CI for AUC | Standard error | P value | Cut-off value | Sensitivity | Specificity |
hs-CRP | 0.890 | 0.840-0.941 | 0.026 | < 0.001 | 1.135 | 0.950 | 0.975 |
TM | 0.989 | 0.972-1.000 | 0.009 | < 0.001 | 18.345 | 0.992 | 0.05 |
Hct | 0.676 | 0.586-0.766 | 0.046 | 0.001 | 34.990 | 0.967 | 0.975 |
ESR | 0.911 | 0.867-0.955 | 0.022 | < 0.001 | 17.365 | 0.992 | 0.975 |
CD62P | 0.982 | 0.966-0.997 | 0.008 | < 0.001 | 6.635 | 0.992 | 0.325 |
PLT | 0.680 | 0.572-0.788 | 0.055 | 0.001 | 47.290 | 0.975 | 0.975 |
APTT | 0.987 | 0.973-1.000 | 0.007 | < 0.001 | 38.650 | 0.992 | 0.650 |
PT | 0.942 | 0.908-0.975 | 0.017 | < 0.001 | 12.810 | 0.992 | 0.875 |
TT | 0.929 | 0.890-0.968 | 0.020 | < 0.001 | 12.680 | 0.992 | 0.975 |
FIB | 0.957 | 0.929-0.986 | 0.015 | < 0.001 | 2.110 | 0.975 | 0.267 |
Table 8 Efficacy analysis of each indicator in predicting primary hypertension
Indicator | hs-CRP | TM | Hct | ESR | CD62P | PLT | APTT | PT | TT | FIB |
hs-CRP | - | 0.792a | 0.237 (0.003) | 0.782a | 0.753a | -0.296a | -0.794a | -0.652a | -0.631a | 0.802a |
TM | 0.792a | - | 0.300a | 0.818a | 0.813a | -0.329a | -0.856a | -0.734a | -0.682a | 0.846a |
Hct | 0.237 (0.003) | 0.300a | - | 0.317a | 0.279a | -0.113 (0.153) | -0.295a | -0.201 (0.011) | -0.279a | 0.318a |
ESR | 0.782a | 0.818a | 0.317a | - | 0.788a | -0.267 (0.001) | -0.821a | -0.665a | -0.626a | 0.830a |
CD62P | 0.753a | 0.813a | 0.279a | 0.788a | - | -0.246 (0.002) | -0.850a | -0.707a | -0.668a | 0.814a |
PLT | -0.296a | -0.329a | -0.113 (0.153) | -0.267 (0.001) | -0.246 (0.002) | - | 0.331a | 0.214 (0.007) | 0.223 (0.005) | -0.272 (0.001) |
APTT | 0.794a | 0.856a | 0.295a | 0.821a | 0.850a | -0.331 | - | 0.677a | 0.681a | -0.843a |
PT | 0.652a | 0.734a | 0.201 (0.011) | 0.665a | 0.707a | -0.214 (0.007) | 0.677a | - | 0.534a | -0.739a |
TT | 0.631a | 0.682a | 0.279a | 0.626a | 0.668a | -0.223 (0.005) | 0.681a | 0.534a | - | -0.674a |
FIB | 0.802a | 0.846a | 0.318a | 0.830a | 0.814a | -0.272 (0.001) | -0.843a | -0.739a | -0.674a | - |
- Citation: Luo J, Yang T, Ding L, Xiong JH, Ying T, Xu F. Relevant detection indicator of prethrombotic state in patients with primary hypertension. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(24): 5678-5691
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i24/5678.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5678