Lu LL, Hu XJ, Yang Y, Xu S, Yang SY, Zhang CY, Zhao QY. Correlation of myopia onset and progression with corneal biomechanical parameters in children. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(5): 1548-1556 [PMID: 35211592 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1548]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Li-Li Lu, MBChB, Attending Doctor, Department of Ophthalmology, Cangzhou Aier Eye Hospital, No. 35 Huanghe West Road, Yongan South Avenue, Yunhe District, Cangzhou 061000, Hebei Province, China. lili5lu@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Ophthalmology
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2022; 10(5): 1548-1556 Published online Feb 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1548
Table 1 Comparison of general ocular measurement parameters among the three groups of subjects
Number of cases
SE (D)
IOP (mmHg)
AL (mm)
CCT (μm)
Km
Myopia group
207
-2.543 ± 0.493
17.04 ± 2.88
25.61 ± 0.77
560.31 ± 36.13
43.15 ± 2.05
Emmetropia group
102
-0.104 ± 0.025
15.40 ± 2.09
23.35 ± 0.68
559.23 ± 38.43
43.05 ± 1.96
Hyperopia group
109
2.465 ± 1.025
15.32 ± 2.93
22.08 ± 0.79
561.92 ± 40.50
43.61 ± 2.34
F
2321
19.94
855.1
0.1364
2.279
P value
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
0.8725
0.1036
Table 2 Comparison of corneal biomechanical parameters among the three groups of subjects
Number of cases
A1V (ms-1)
A1L (mm)
A1T (ms)
A1DA (mm)
A2V (ms-1)
A2L (mm)
A2T (ms)
A2D (mm)
HCT (ms)
HCR (mm)
PD (mm)
DA (mm)
IR
ARTh
SP-A1
CBI
TBI
Myopia group
207
0.13 ± 0.02
1.85 ± 0.29
7.63 ± 0.29
0.12 ± 0.01
0.29 ± 0.06
1.73 ± 0.39
21.33 ± 0.93
0.37 ± 0.08
16.70 ± 0.79
7.59 ± 0.73
3.42 ± 0.88
0.98 ± 0.09
9.23 ± 1.93
472.03 ± 131.43
102.01 ± 18.43
0.53 ± 0.35
0.56 ± 0.25
Emmetropia group
102
0.15 ± 0.05
1.93 ± 0.33
7.41 ± 0.22
0.13 ± 0.01
0.30 ± 0.02
1.70 ± 0.55
21.57 ± 1.24
0.41 ± 0.09
16.73 ± 0.49
6.42 ± 0.89
3.77 ± 0.92
0.99 ± 0.09
9.05 ± 2.61
451.61 ± 111.43
107.32 ± 14.62
0.23 ± 0.14
0.33 ± 0.23
Hyperopia group
109
0.14 ± 0.03
1.77 ± 0.39
7.39 ± 0.29
0.13 ± 0.02
0.31 ± 0.05
1.63 ± 0.53
21.35 ± 1.29
0.47 ± 0.13
16.59 ± 0.66
6.69 ± 1.02
3.02 ± 0.61
0.99 ± 0.10
11.34 ± 1.34
256.45 ± 46.34
108.42 ± 14.45
0.02 ± 0.01
0.12 ± 0.07
F
13.57
6.258
36.89
29.34
5.780
1.610
1.706
37.52
1.267
78.85
21.67
0.6079
47.99
145.7
6.681
150.6
158.2
P value
< 0.0001
0.0021
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
0.0033
0.2011
0.1829
< 0.0001
0.2829
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
0.5450
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
0.0014
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
Table 3 Correlation of corneal biomechanical parameters with general ocular measurement parameters
SE (D)
IOP (mmHg)
AL (mm)
CCT (μm)
Km
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
A1V
-0.042
0.3917
0.053
0.2797
-0.003
0.9512
-0.583
< 0.0001
0.103
0.0353
A1L
0.033
0.5010
-0.061
0.2133
-0.077
0.1160
0.483
< 0.0001
-0.089
0.692
A1T
0.024
0.6246
-0.091
0.0631
-0.082
0.0941
0.562
< 0.0001
0.008
0.8705
A1DA
0.038
0.4384
-0.073
0.1362
0.053
0.2797
0.358
0.2367
0.048
0.3276
A2V
0.235
< 0.0001
-0.114
0.0197
0.302
< 0.0001
0.542
< 0.0001
0.043
0.3805
A2L
0.124
0.0112
-0.139
0.0044
-0.094
0.0548
0.382
< 0.0001
-0.117
0.0167
A2T
0.093
0.0575
-0.088
0.0723
-0.110
0.0245
0.421
< 0.0001
0.021
0.6686
A2DA
0.041
0.4031
-0.038
0.4383
0.074
0.1309
0.345
< 0.0001
0.033
0.5010
HCT
0.004
0.9350
-0.008
0.8705
-0.109
0.0258
0.049
0.3176
0.063
0.1986
HCR
0.009
0.8705
-0.039
0.4265
-0.049
0.3176
0.482
< 0.0001
-0.285
< 0.0001
PD
-0.130
0.0078
0.117
0.0167
0.545
< 0.0001
0.381
< 0.0001
-0.394
< 0.0001
DA
-0.119
0.0149
0.193
0.0001
0.038
0.4384
0.295
< 0.0001
0.234
< 0.0001
IR
-0.204
< 0.0001
0.244
< 0.0001
0.025
0.6103
0.421
< 0.0001
0.283
< 0.0001
ARTh
0.062
0.2059
-0.072
0.1417
0.017
0.7289
0.274
< 0.0001
-0.085
0.0826
SP-A1
0.032
0.5141
-0.024
0.6246
-0.059
0.2287
0.362
< 0.0001
0.008
0.8705
CBI
0.039
0.4265
-0.019
0.6985
-0.06
0.2209
0.385
< 0.0001
0.087
0.0756
TBI
0.027
0.5820
-0.020
0.6835
-0.016
0.7443
0.0235
< 0.0001
0.064
0.1916
Table 4 Correlation between spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure, and axial length growth and the change in corneal biomechanical parameters in subjects in the myopic group
ΔSE (D)
ΔIOP (mmHg)
ΔAL (mm)
CCT (μm)
Km
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
ρ
P value
ΔA1V
-0.0391
0.5758
0.0460
0.5107
-0.0032
0.9631
-0.5873
< 0.0001
0.1010
0.1478
ΔA1L
0.0370
0.5962
-0.0673
0.3350
-0.0818
0.2415
0.4236
< 0.0001
-0.0716
0.3053
ΔA1T
0.0257
0.7133
-0.0917
0.1889
-0.0909
0.1926
0.4629
< 0.0001
0.0080
0.9084
ΔA1DA
0.0344
0.6230
-0.0586
0.4013
0.0455
0.5147
0.3530
< 0.0001
0.0475
0.4966
ΔA2V
0.2027
0.0034
-0.1075
0.1232
0.3121
< 0.0001
0.5029
< 0.0001
0.0472
0.4994
ΔA2L
0.1397
0.0446
-0.1459
0.0360
-0.0971
0.1640
0.4505
< 0.0001
-0.0972
0.1637
ΔA2T
0.0772
0.2691
-0.0718
0.3042
-0.0897
0.1987
0.4920
< 0.0001
0.0244
0.7268
ΔA2DA
0.0462
0.5089
-0.0321
0.6459
0.0677
0.3327
0.3561
< 0.0001
0.0331
0.6357
ΔHCT
0.0035
0.9601
-0.0073
0.9171
-0.1120
0.1082
0.0465
0.5061
0.0717
0.3047
ΔHCR
0.0081
0.9073
-0.0323
0.6446
-0.0508
0.4669
0.5378
< 0.0001
-0.3190
< 0.0001
ΔPD
-0.1331
0.0559
0.1361
0.0505
0.4427
< 0.0001
0.3246
< 0.0001
-0.3320
< 0.0001
ΔDA
-0.1130
0.1049
0.1814
0.0089
0.0391
0.5763
0.2474
0.0003
0.2125
0.0021
ΔIR
-0.1841
0.0079
0.2674
0.0001
0.0228
0.7439
0.4886
< 0.0001
0.2615
0.0001
ΔARTh
0.0542
0.4378
-0.0671
0.3365
0.0164
0.8150
0.3274
< 0.0001
-0.0726
0.2983
ΔSP-A1
0.0372
0.5951
-0.0209
0.7655
-0.0623
0.3727
0.4282
< 0.0001
0.0074
0.9161
ΔCBI
0.0321
0.6461
-0.0160
0.8187
-0.0534
0.4450
0.3329
< 0.0001
0.1010
0.1474
ΔTBI
0.0234
0.7378
-0.0187
0.7888
-0.0143
0.8381
0.0247
0.7238
0.0589
0.3988
Citation: Lu LL, Hu XJ, Yang Y, Xu S, Yang SY, Zhang CY, Zhao QY. Correlation of myopia onset and progression with corneal biomechanical parameters in children. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(5): 1548-1556