Prospective Study
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2022; 10(30): 10939-10955
Published online Oct 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10939
Table 1 Demographics of subjects
ACL patients (n = 50) Mean Age (yr) (SD) 30 (9) Male:Female 36:14 Injured knee (Right:Left) 24:26 Mean height (m) (SD) 1.72 (0.1) Mean weight (kg) (SD) 78.1 (14.4) Mean BMI (kg/m2 ) (SD) 26.2 (3.8)
Table 2 Results of knee outcome scores
Pre-operative (n = 50) Post-operative (n = 34) mean ± SD mean ± SD Tegner 3.3 (1.2) 4.1 (0.9) Lysholm 71.7 (12.8) 85.3 (10.5) Cincinnati 62.6 (14.7) 75.9 (9.2) IKDC Sub. 51.5 (17.0) 58.1 (15.6) KOS-ADLS 71.9 (20.5) 76.5 (14.3) SF-12 PCS 41.8 (9.1) 43.2 (10.0) SF-12 MCS 51.3 (9.2) 52.8 (7.9) KOOS Symptoms 72.5 (15.1) 71.3 (14.4) Pain 76.9 (14.4) 77.9 (15.8) ADL 84.5 (15.1) 87.3 (11.3) Sp. & Rec. 49.2 (24.9) 43.2 (26.1) QOL 25.8 (18.7) 39.0 (18.0) Mode Mode IKDC Exam. Abnormal Nearly normal T&H Fair Good
Table 3 Correlations between pre-operative knee outcome scores (n = 50)
Correlation coefficient, P value Tegner Lysholm Cincinnati IKDC Sub. KOS ADLS SF-12, PCS SF-12, MCS KOOS Symp. KOOS pain KOOS ADL KOOS Sp. & Rec. KOOS QOL Tegner - 0.32 0.49 0.47 0.39 0.5 0.12 0.36 0.3 0.26 0.37 0.3 - 0.023a < 0.001a 0.001a 0.006a < 0.001a 0.416 0.013a 0.040a 0.074 0.009a 0.047a Lysholm 0.32 - 0.83 0.62 0.74 0.49 0.38 0.68 0.64 0.52 0.5 0.55 0.023a - < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.007a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a Cincinnati 0.49 0.83 - 0.66 0.8 0.56 0.37 0.54 0.63 0.58 0.54 0.59 < 0.001a < 0.001a - < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.009a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a IKDC Sub. 0.47 0.62 0.66 - 0.73 0.65 0.36 0.68 0.69 0.65 0.75 0.63 < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a - < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.011a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a KOS-ADLS 0.39 0.74 0.8 0.73 - 0.69 0.52 0.72 0.73 0.82 0.65 0.59 0.006a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a - < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a SF-12, PCS 0.5 0.49 0.56 0.65 0.69 - 0.27 0.63 0.65 0.65 0.6 0.55 < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a - 0.059 < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a SF-12, MCS 0.12 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.52 0.27 - 0.32 0.41 0.47 0.17 0.28 0.416 0.007a 0.009a 0.011a < 0.001a 0.059 - 0.024a 0.004a 0.001a 0.247 0.055 KOOS Symp. 0.36 0.68 0.54 0.68 0.72 0.63 0.32 - 0.79 0.68 0.68 0.47 0.013a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.024a - < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.001a Pain 0.3 0.64 0.63 0.69 0.73 0.65 0.41 0.79 - 0.8 0.61 0.53 0.040a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.004a < 0.001a - < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a ADL 0.26 0.52 0.58 0.65 0.82 0.65 0.47 0.68 0.8 - 0.64 0.6 0.074 < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a - < 0.001a < 0.001a Sp. & Rec. 0.37 0.5 0.54 0.75 0.65 0.6 0.17 0.68 0.61 0.64 - 0.63 0.009a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.247 < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a - < 0.001a QOL 0.29 0.55 0.59 0.63 0.59 0.55 0.28 0.47 0.53 0.6 0.63 - 0.047a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.055 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a -
Table 4 Correlations between pre-operative knee outcome scores (n = 50)
Correlation coefficient, P value Tegner Lysholm Cincinnati IKDC Sub. KOS ADLS SF-12, PCS SF-12, MCS KOOS Symp. KOOS pain KOOS ADL KOOS Sp. & Rec. KOOS QOL IKDC Exam IKDC Exam. -0.11 -0.22 -0.31 -0.27 -0.33 -0.17 -0.17 -0.34 -0.23 -0.31 -0.34 -0.23 ___ 0.441 0.134 0.032a 0.057 0.020a 0.228 0.251 0.019a 0.109 0.033a 0.017a 0.105 ___ T&H -0.43 -0.67 -0.66 -0.64 -0.61 -0.6 -0.14 -0.63 -0.6 -0.51 -0.54 -0.46 0.17 0.002a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.351 < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.001a 0.243
Table 5 Correlations between post-operative knee outcome scores (n = 34)
Correlation coefficient, P value Tegner Lysholm Cincinnati IKDC Sub. KOS ADLS SF-12, PCS SF-12, MCS KOOS Symp. KOOS pain KOOS ADL KOOS Sp. & Rec. KOOS QOL Tegner - 0.36 0.47 0.51 0.37 0.49 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.38 0.16 0.52 - 0.037a 0.006a 0.003a 0.032a 0.004a 0.048a 0.044a 0.121 0.028a 0.384 0.002a Lysholm 0.36 - 0.89 0.71 0.77 0.71 0.32 0.61 0.74 0.72 0.34 0.45 0.037a - < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.07 < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.053 0.009a Cincinnati 0.47 0.89 - 0.87 0.91 0.78 0.39 0.73 0.82 0.85 0.48 0.63 0.006a < 0.001a - < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.025a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.004a < 0.001a IKDC Sub. 0.51 0.71 0.87 - 0.84 0.77 0.47 0.74 0.74 0.81 0.59 0.71 0.003a < 0.001a < 0.001a - < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.006a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a KOS-ADLS 0.37 0.77 0.91 0.84 - 0.75 0.45 0.82 87 0.86 0.59 0.64 0.032a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a - < 0.001a 0.008a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a SF-12, PCS 0.49 0.71 0.78 0.77 0.75 - 0.25 0.57 0.72 0.83 0.47 0.62 0.004a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a - 0.16 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.005a < 0.001a SF-12, MCS 0.35 0.32 0.39 0.47 0.45 0.25 - 0.56 0.45 0.48 0.18 0.44 0.048a 0.07 0.025a 0.006a 0.008a 0.16 - 0.001a 0.008a 0.004a 0.288 0.010a KOOS Symp. 0.35 0.61 0.73 0.74 0.82 0.57 0.56 - 0.75 0.69 0.61 0.58 0.044a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.001a 0.001a - < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a Pain 0.28 0.74 0.82 0.74 0.87 0.72 0.45 0.75 - 0.86 0.56 0.53 0.121 < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.008a < 0.001a - < 0.001a 0.001a 0.001a ADL 0.38 0.72 0.85 0.81 0.86 0.83 0.48 0.69 0.86 - 0.55 0.54 0.028a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.004a < 0.001a < 0.001a - 0.001a 0.001a Sp. & Rec. 0.16 0.34 0.48 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.19 0.61 0.56 0.55 - 0.45 0.384 0.053 0.004a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.005a 0.288 < 0.001a 0.001a 0.001a - 0.008a QOL 0.52 0.45 0.63 0.71 0.64 0.62 0.44 0.58 0.53 0.54 0.45 - 0.002a 0.009a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.010a < 0.001a 0.001a 0.001a 0.008a -
Table 6 Correlations between post-operative knee outcome scores (n = 34)
Correlation coefficient, P value Tegner Lysholm Cincinnati IKDC Sub. KOS ADLS SF-12, PCS SF-12, MCS KOOS Symp. KOOS pain KOOS ADL KOOS Sp. & Rec. KOOS QOL IKDC Exam IKDC Exam. -0.34 -0.3 -0.39 -0.42 -0.35 -0.39 0.02 -0.17 -0.35 -0.35 -0.36 -0.38 - 0.056 0.095 0.024a 0.016a 0.044a 0.024a 0.93 0.324 0.044a 0.043a 0.035a 0.025a - T&H -0.51 -0.62 -0.55 -0.61 -0.63 -0.6 -0.55 0.66 -0.62 -0.59 -0.45 -0.61 0.2 0.002a < 0.001a 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a < 0.001a 0.009a < 0.001a 0.26
Table 7 Multiple linear regression analysis of pre-operative knee outcome scores (n = 50)
Equation (R 2 , P value, σE ) KOOS Tegner = 2.3 + (0.02 × Symp.) + (0.003 × Pain) - (0.01 × ADL) + (0.01 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.01 × QOL) (R 2 = 0.17, P = 0.161, σE = 1.2) Lysholm = 38.2 + (0.36 × Symp.) + (0.22 × Pain) - (0.14 × ADL) - (0.05 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.20 × QOL) (R 2 = 0.55, P < 0.001, σE = 9.0) Cincinnati = 27.0 + (0.02 × Symp.) + (0.36 × Pain) + (0.02 × ADL) + (0.05 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.21 × QOL) (R 2 = 0.49, P < 0.001, σE = 10.9) IKDC Subjective = 12.6 + (0.11 × Symp.) + (0.25 × Pain) - (0.002 × ADL) + (0.23 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.14 × QOL) (R 2 = 0.68, P < 0.001, σE = 9.1) KOS-ADLS = (0.29 × Symp.) + (0.01 × Pain) + (0.64 × ADL) + (0.05 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.09 × QOL) – 6.4 (R 2 = 0.74, P <0.001, σE = 10.3) SF-12 Tegner = 0.6 + (0.07 × PCS) - (0.002 × MCS) (R 2 = 0.25, P = 0.002, σE = 1.1) Lysholm = 30.6 + (0.61 × PCS) + (0.33 × MCS) (R 2 = 0.30, P = 0.002, σE = 10.7) Cincinnati = 14.4 + (0.83 × PCS) + (0.33 × MCS) (R 2 = 0.36, P < 0.001, σE = 11.7) IKDC Subjective = (1.18 × PCS) + (0.32 × MCS) - 12.2 (R 2 = 0.46, P < 0.001, σE = 12.7) KOS-ADLS = (1.29 × PCS) + (0.65 × MCS) - 12.8 (R 2 = 0.59, P < 0.001, σE = 12.2)
Table 8 Multiple linear regression analysis of post-operative knee outcome scores (n = 34)
Equation (R 2 , P value, σE ) KOOS Tegner = 1.2 + (0.01 × Symp.) - (0.02 × Pain) + (0.04 × ADL) - (0.01 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.02 × QOL) (R 2 = 0.33, P =0.042, σE = 0.8) Lysholm = 31.6 + (0.12 × Symp.) + (0.29 × Pain) + (0.28 × ADL) - (0.08 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.02 × QOL) (R 2 = 0.60, P < 0.001, σE = 7.2) Cincinnati = 20.9 + (0.12 × Symp.) + (0.14 × Pain) + (0.39 × ADL) - (0.04 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.09 × QOL) (R 2 = 0.80, P < 0.001, σE = 4.5) IKDC Subjective = (0.23 × Symp.) - (0.07 × Pain) + (0.69 × ADL) + (0.05 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.27 × QOL) - 26.5 (R 2 = 0.79, P < 0.001, σE = 7.9) KOS-ADLS = (0.29 × Symp.) + (0.25 × Pain) + (0.42 × ADL) + (0.000009 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.11 × QOL) – 5.4 (R 2 = 0.87, P < 0.001, σE = 5.6) SF-12 Tegner = 0.8 + (0.04 × PCS) + (0.03 × MCS) (R 2 = 0.30, P = 0.005, σE = 0.8) Lysholm = 44.4 + (0.70 × PCS) + (0.20 × MCS) (R 2 = 0.52, P < 0.001, σE = 7.5) Cincinnati = 34.1 + (0.67 × PCS) + (0.24 × MCS) (R 2 = 0.65, P < 0.001, σE = 5.6) IKDC Subjective = (1.07 × PCS) + (0.58 × MCS) - 18.8 (R 2 = 0.68, P < 0.001, σE = 9.2) KOS-ADLS = 7.9 + (0.97 × PCS) + (0.51 × MCS) (R 2 = 0.65, P < 0.001, σE = 8.8)