Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2022; 10(30): 10939-10955
Published online Oct 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10939
Table 1 Demographics of subjects
ACL patients (n = 50)
Mean Age (yr) (SD)30 (9)
Male:Female36:14
Injured knee (Right:Left)24:26
Mean height (m) (SD)1.72 (0.1)
Mean weight (kg) (SD)78.1 (14.4)
Mean BMI (kg/m2) (SD)26.2 (3.8)
Table 2 Results of knee outcome scores

Pre-operative (n = 50)
Post-operative (n = 34)
mean ± SDmean ± SD
Tegner3.3 (1.2)4.1 (0.9)
Lysholm71.7 (12.8)85.3 (10.5)
Cincinnati62.6 (14.7)75.9 (9.2)
IKDC Sub.51.5 (17.0)58.1 (15.6)
KOS-ADLS71.9 (20.5)76.5 (14.3)
SF-12 PCS41.8 (9.1)43.2 (10.0)
SF-12 MCS51.3 (9.2)52.8 (7.9)
KOOS
Symptoms72.5 (15.1)71.3 (14.4)
Pain76.9 (14.4)77.9 (15.8)
ADL84.5 (15.1)87.3 (11.3)
Sp. & Rec.49.2 (24.9)43.2 (26.1)
QOL25.8 (18.7)39.0 (18.0)
ModeMode
IKDC Exam.AbnormalNearly normal
T&HFairGood
Table 3 Correlations between pre-operative knee outcome scores (n = 50)
Correlation coefficient, P value

Tegner
Lysholm
Cincinnati
IKDC Sub.
KOS ADLS
SF-12, PCS
SF-12, MCS
KOOS Symp.
KOOS pain
KOOS ADL
KOOS Sp. & Rec.
KOOS QOL
Tegner-0.320.490.470.390.50.120.360.30.260.370.3
-0.023a< 0.001a0.001a0.006a< 0.001a0.4160.013a0.040a0.0740.009a0.047a
Lysholm0.32-0.830.620.740.490.380.680.640.520.50.55
0.023a-< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.007a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a
Cincinnati0.490.83-0.660.80.560.370.540.630.580.540.59
< 0.001a< 0.001a-< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.009a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a
IKDC Sub.0.470.620.66-0.730.650.360.680.690.650.750.63
< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a-< 0.001a< 0.001a0.011a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a
KOS-ADLS0.390.740.80.73-0.690.520.720.730.820.650.59
0.006a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a-< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a
SF-12, PCS0.50.490.560.650.69-0.270.630.650.650.60.55
< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a-0.059< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a
SF-12, MCS0.120.380.370.360.520.27-0.320.410.470.170.28
0.4160.007a0.009a0.011a< 0.001a0.059-0.024a0.004a0.001a0.2470.055
KOOS
Symp.0.360.680.540.680.720.630.32-0.790.680.680.47
0.013a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.024a-< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.001a
Pain0.30.640.630.690.730.650.410.79-0.80.610.53
0.040a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.004a< 0.001a-< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a
ADL0.260.520.580.650.820.650.470.680.8-0.640.6
0.074< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a-< 0.001a< 0.001a
Sp. & Rec.0.370.50.540.750.650.60.170.680.610.64-0.63
0.009a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.247< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a-< 0.001a
QOL0.290.550.590.630.590.550.280.470.530.60.63-
0.047a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.0550.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a-
Table 4 Correlations between pre-operative knee outcome scores (n = 50)
Correlation coefficient, P value
TegnerLysholmCincinnatiIKDC Sub.KOS ADLSSF-12, PCSSF-12, MCSKOOS Symp.KOOS painKOOS ADLKOOS Sp. & Rec.KOOS QOLIKDC Exam
IKDC Exam.-0.11-0.22-0.31-0.27-0.33-0.17-0.17-0.34-0.23-0.31-0.34-0.23___
0.4410.1340.032a0.0570.020a0.2280.2510.019a0.1090.033a0.017a0.105___
T&H-0.43-0.67-0.66-0.64-0.61-0.6-0.14-0.63-0.6-0.51-0.54-0.460.17
0.002a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.351< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.001a0.243
Table 5 Correlations between post-operative knee outcome scores (n = 34)
Correlation coefficient, P value

Tegner
Lysholm
Cincinnati
IKDC Sub.
KOS ADLS
SF-12, PCS
SF-12, MCS
KOOS Symp.
KOOS pain
KOOS ADL
KOOS Sp. & Rec.
KOOS QOL
Tegner-0.360.470.510.370.490.350.350.280.380.160.52
-0.037a0.006a0.003a0.032a0.004a0.048a0.044a0.1210.028a0.3840.002a
Lysholm0.36-0.890.710.770.710.320.610.740.720.340.45
0.037a-< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.07< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.0530.009a
Cincinnati0.470.89-0.870.910.780.390.730.820.850.480.63
0.006a< 0.001a-< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.025a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.004a< 0.001a
IKDC Sub.0.510.710.87-0.840.770.470.740.740.810.590.71
0.003a< 0.001a< 0.001a-< 0.001a< 0.001a0.006a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a
KOS-ADLS0.370.770.910.84-0.750.450.82870.860.590.64
0.032a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a-< 0.001a0.008a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a
SF-12, PCS0.490.710.780.770.75-0.250.570.720.830.470.62
0.004a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a-0.160.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.005a< 0.001a
SF-12, MCS0.350.320.390.470.450.25-0.560.450.480.180.44
0.048a0.070.025a0.006a0.008a0.16-0.001a0.008a0.004a0.2880.010a
KOOS
Symp.0.350.610.730.740.820.570.56-0.750.690.610.58
0.044a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.001a0.001a-< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a
Pain0.280.740.820.740.870.720.450.75-0.860.560.53
0.121< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.008a< 0.001a-< 0.001a0.001a0.001a
ADL0.380.720.850.810.860.830.480.690.86-0.550.54
0.028a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.004a< 0.001a< 0.001a-0.001a0.001a
Sp. & Rec.0.160.340.480.590.590.470.190.610.560.55-0.45
0.3840.0530.004a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.005a0.288< 0.001a0.001a0.001a-0.008a
QOL0.520.450.630.710.640.620.440.580.530.540.45-
0.002a0.009a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.010a< 0.001a0.001a0.001a0.008a-
Table 6 Correlations between post-operative knee outcome scores (n = 34)
Correlation coefficient, P value
TegnerLysholmCincinnatiIKDC Sub.KOS ADLSSF-12, PCSSF-12, MCSKOOS Symp.KOOS painKOOS ADLKOOS Sp. & Rec.KOOS QOLIKDC Exam
IKDC Exam.-0.34-0.3-0.39-0.42-0.35-0.390.02-0.17-0.35-0.35-0.36-0.38-
0.0560.0950.024a0.016a0.044a0.024a0.930.3240.044a0.043a0.035a0.025a-
T&H-0.51-0.62-0.55-0.61-0.63-0.6-0.550.66-0.62-0.59-0.45-0.610.2
0.002a < 0.001a0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a< 0.001a0.009a< 0.001a 0.26
Table 7 Multiple linear regression analysis of pre-operative knee outcome scores (n = 50)
Equation (R2, P value, σE)
KOOS
Tegner = 2.3 + (0.02 × Symp.) + (0.003 × Pain) - (0.01 × ADL) + (0.01 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.01 × QOL)
(R2 = 0.17, P = 0.161, σE = 1.2)
Lysholm = 38.2 + (0.36 × Symp.) + (0.22 × Pain) - (0.14 × ADL) - (0.05 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.20 × QOL)
(R2 = 0.55, P < 0.001, σE = 9.0)
Cincinnati = 27.0 + (0.02 × Symp.) + (0.36 × Pain) + (0.02 × ADL) + (0.05 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.21 × QOL)
(R2 = 0.49, P < 0.001, σE = 10.9)
IKDC Subjective = 12.6 + (0.11 × Symp.) + (0.25 × Pain) - (0.002 × ADL) + (0.23 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.14 × QOL)
(R2 = 0.68, P < 0.001, σE = 9.1)
KOS-ADLS = (0.29 × Symp.) + (0.01 × Pain) + (0.64 × ADL) + (0.05 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.09 × QOL) – 6.4
(R2 = 0.74, P <0.001, σE = 10.3)
SF-12
Tegner = 0.6 + (0.07 × PCS) - (0.002 × MCS)
(R2 = 0.25, P = 0.002, σE = 1.1)
Lysholm = 30.6 + (0.61 × PCS) + (0.33 × MCS)
(R2 = 0.30, P = 0.002, σE = 10.7)
Cincinnati = 14.4 + (0.83 × PCS) + (0.33 × MCS)
(R2 = 0.36, P < 0.001, σE = 11.7)
IKDC Subjective = (1.18 × PCS) + (0.32 × MCS) - 12.2
(R2 = 0.46, P < 0.001, σE = 12.7)
KOS-ADLS = (1.29 × PCS) + (0.65 × MCS) - 12.8
(R2 = 0.59, P < 0.001, σE = 12.2)
Table 8 Multiple linear regression analysis of post-operative knee outcome scores (n = 34)
Equation (R2, P value, σE)
KOOS
Tegner = 1.2 + (0.01 × Symp.) - (0.02 × Pain) + (0.04 × ADL) - (0.01 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.02 × QOL)
(R2 = 0.33, P =0.042, σE = 0.8)
Lysholm = 31.6 + (0.12 × Symp.) + (0.29 × Pain) + (0.28 × ADL) - (0.08 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.02 × QOL)
(R2 = 0.60, P < 0.001, σE = 7.2)
Cincinnati = 20.9 + (0.12 × Symp.) + (0.14 × Pain) + (0.39 × ADL) - (0.04 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.09 × QOL)
(R2 = 0.80, P < 0.001, σE = 4.5)
IKDC Subjective = (0.23 × Symp.) - (0.07 × Pain) + (0.69 × ADL) + (0.05 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.27 × QOL) - 26.5
(R2 = 0.79, P < 0.001, σE = 7.9)
KOS-ADLS = (0.29 × Symp.) + (0.25 × Pain) + (0.42 × ADL) + (0.000009 × Sp. & Rec.) + (0.11 × QOL) – 5.4
(R2 = 0.87, P < 0.001, σE = 5.6)
SF-12
Tegner = 0.8 + (0.04 × PCS) + (0.03 × MCS)
(R2 = 0.30, P = 0.005, σE = 0.8)
Lysholm = 44.4 + (0.70 × PCS) + (0.20 × MCS)
(R2 = 0.52, P < 0.001, σE = 7.5)
Cincinnati = 34.1 + (0.67 × PCS) + (0.24 × MCS)
(R2 = 0.65, P < 0.001, σE = 5.6)
IKDC Subjective = (1.07 × PCS) + (0.58 × MCS) - 18.8
(R2 = 0.68, P < 0.001, σE = 9.2)
KOS-ADLS = 7.9 + (0.97 × PCS) + (0.51 × MCS)
(R2 = 0.65, P < 0.001, σE = 8.8)