Zhao K, Shan BQ, Gao YP, Xu JY. Role of carbon nanotracers in lymph node dissection of advanced gastric cancer and the selection of preoperative labeling time. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(3): 870-881 [PMID: 35127902 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.870]
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jan 21, 2022; 10(3): 870-881 Published online Jan 21, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.870
Table 1 Lymphnodes dissection extent in laparoscopic total gastrectomy
Lymphnodes dissection extent
Lymphadenectomy
LTG
D1
No. 1-7
D2
D1 + No. 8a, 9, 10, 11p, 11d, 12a
LSG
D1
No. 1, 3, 4sb, 4d, 5, 6, 7
D2
D1 + No. 8a, 9, 11p, 12a
Table 2 Basic information of 307 patients
Basic information
Control group
Experimental group
P value
LTG
LSG
LTG
LSG
Number of cases
77
50
99
81
Gender
> 0.05
Male
44
27
49
45
Female
33
23
50
36
Age, yr
60 ± 17
64 ± 18
> 0.05
Pathological types
> 0.05
Highly differentiated adenocarcinoma
14
10
14
12
Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma
23
13
30
25
Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma
29
19
45
40
Other types
11
8
10
4
T stage
> 0.05
1
10
10
6
4
2
20
11
33
27
3
37
22
44
39
4
10
7
16
11
N stage
> 0.05
1
15
6
22
13
2
29
20
40
30
3
33
24
37
38
CEA
> 0.05
Normal
44
20
42
32
Increased
33
30
57
49
CA199
> 0.05
Normal
43
24
50
34
Increase
34
26
49
47
Intraoperative blood loss (mL)
71.13 ± 21.33
90.70 ± 31.77
61.53 ± 20.38
75.69 ± 20.18
< 0.05
Complication
3
0
2
2
> 0.05
Postoperative bleeding
2
0
0
0
Anastomotic fistula
1
0
1
2
Obstruction
0
0
1
0
Postoperative hospital stay (d)
6.55 ± 4.63
7.23 ± 4.51
6.54 ± 4.16
7.21 ± 4.32
> 0.05
Table 3 Difference in the number of dissected D1 lymph nodes in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy
Cases
Dissected lymph nodes of D1 station
Average
Statistic difference
T
P value
LTG
Experimental group
99
2088
19.65 ± 3.08
3.066
0.003
Control group
77
1590
21.09 ± 3.08
LSG
Experimental group
81
1622
20.02 ± 2.69
1.700
0.091
Control group
50
965
19.30 ± 1.72
Table 4 Difference in the number of dissected D2 lymph nodes in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy
Cases
Dissected lymph nodes of D2 station
Average
Statistic difference
T
P value
LTG
Experimental group
99
1372
13.85 ± 2.26
5.059
0.000
Control group
77
943
12.25 ± 2.06
LSG
Experimental group
81
1023
12.63 ± 2.22
2.855
0.005
Control group
50
579
11.58 ± 1.73
Table 5 Differences in the number of D1 lymph nodes dissected and the number of black stains at different preoperative labeling times in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy
Labeling time (d)
Cases
Average number of dissected lymph nodes
Average number of black staining lymph nodes
LTG
0
30
18.87 ± 2.78
11.30 ± 2.42
1
36
21.86 ± 2.39
14.00 ± 2.29
2
33
22.27 ± 2.93
14.36 ± 2.45
P
0.000
0.000
F
14.385
14.946
LSG
0
16
18.19 ± 2.01
8.15 ± 1.65
1
34
21.03 ± 3.00
10.82 ± 2.55
2
31
19.87 ± 1.98
10.81 ± 1.94
P
0.002
0.000
F
7.075
9.500
Table 6 Differences in the number of D2 lymph nodes dissected and the number of black stains at different preoperative labeling times in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy
Labeling time (d)
Cases
Average number of dissected lymph nodes
Average number of black staining lymph nodes
LTG
30
12.27 ± 2.46
3.07 ± 1.09
30
36
14.47 ± 1.64
4.14 ± 1.46
36
33
14.64 ± 1.88
4.45 ± 1.28
33
0.000
0.000
13.262
9.522
LSG
0
16
11.50 ± 2.12
2.75 ± 1.15
1
34
12.53 ± 2.39
4.74 ± 1.85
2
31
13.32 ± 1.71
4.42 ± 1.64
P
0.024
0.001
F
3.891
7.906
Citation: Zhao K, Shan BQ, Gao YP, Xu JY. Role of carbon nanotracers in lymph node dissection of advanced gastric cancer and the selection of preoperative labeling time. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(3): 870-881