Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 21, 2022; 10(3): 870-881
Published online Jan 21, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.870
Published online Jan 21, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.870
Table 1 Lymphnodes dissection extent in laparoscopic total gastrectomy
Lymphnodes dissection extent | Lymphadenectomy |
LTG | |
D1 | No. 1-7 |
D2 | D1 + No. 8a, 9, 10, 11p, 11d, 12a |
LSG | |
D1 | No. 1, 3, 4sb, 4d, 5, 6, 7 |
D2 | D1 + No. 8a, 9, 11p, 12a |
Table 2 Basic information of 307 patients
Basic information | Control group | Experimental group | P value | ||
LTG | LSG | LTG | LSG | ||
Number of cases | 77 | 50 | 99 | 81 | |
Gender | > 0.05 | ||||
Male | 44 | 27 | 49 | 45 | |
Female | 33 | 23 | 50 | 36 | |
Age, yr | 60 ± 17 | 64 ± 18 | > 0.05 | ||
Pathological types | > 0.05 | ||||
Highly differentiated adenocarcinoma | 14 | 10 | 14 | 12 | |
Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma | 23 | 13 | 30 | 25 | |
Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma | 29 | 19 | 45 | 40 | |
Other types | 11 | 8 | 10 | 4 | |
T stage | > 0.05 | ||||
1 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 4 | |
2 | 20 | 11 | 33 | 27 | |
3 | 37 | 22 | 44 | 39 | |
4 | 10 | 7 | 16 | 11 | |
N stage | > 0.05 | ||||
1 | 15 | 6 | 22 | 13 | |
2 | 29 | 20 | 40 | 30 | |
3 | 33 | 24 | 37 | 38 | |
CEA | > 0.05 | ||||
Normal | 44 | 20 | 42 | 32 | |
Increased | 33 | 30 | 57 | 49 | |
CA199 | > 0.05 | ||||
Normal | 43 | 24 | 50 | 34 | |
Increase | 34 | 26 | 49 | 47 | |
Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | 71.13 ± 21.33 | 90.70 ± 31.77 | 61.53 ± 20.38 | 75.69 ± 20.18 | < 0.05 |
Complication | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | > 0.05 |
Postoperative bleeding | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Anastomotic fistula | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Obstruction | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
Postoperative hospital stay (d) | 6.55 ± 4.63 | 7.23 ± 4.51 | 6.54 ± 4.16 | 7.21 ± 4.32 | > 0.05 |
Table 3 Difference in the number of dissected D1 lymph nodes in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy
Cases | Dissected lymph nodes of D1 station | Average | Statistic difference | ||
T | P value | ||||
LTG | |||||
Experimental group | 99 | 2088 | 19.65 ± 3.08 | 3.066 | 0.003 |
Control group | 77 | 1590 | 21.09 ± 3.08 | ||
LSG | |||||
Experimental group | 81 | 1622 | 20.02 ± 2.69 | 1.700 | 0.091 |
Control group | 50 | 965 | 19.30 ± 1.72 |
Table 4 Difference in the number of dissected D2 lymph nodes in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy
Cases | Dissected lymph nodes of D2 station | Average | Statistic difference | ||
T | P value | ||||
LTG | |||||
Experimental group | 99 | 1372 | 13.85 ± 2.26 | 5.059 | 0.000 |
Control group | 77 | 943 | 12.25 ± 2.06 | ||
LSG | |||||
Experimental group | 81 | 1023 | 12.63 ± 2.22 | 2.855 | 0.005 |
Control group | 50 | 579 | 11.58 ± 1.73 |
Table 5 Differences in the number of D1 lymph nodes dissected and the number of black stains at different preoperative labeling times in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy
Labeling time (d) | Cases | Average number of dissected lymph nodes | Average number of black staining lymph nodes | |
LTG | 0 | 30 | 18.87 ± 2.78 | 11.30 ± 2.42 |
1 | 36 | 21.86 ± 2.39 | 14.00 ± 2.29 | |
2 | 33 | 22.27 ± 2.93 | 14.36 ± 2.45 | |
P | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
F | 14.385 | 14.946 | ||
LSG | 0 | 16 | 18.19 ± 2.01 | 8.15 ± 1.65 |
1 | 34 | 21.03 ± 3.00 | 10.82 ± 2.55 | |
2 | 31 | 19.87 ± 1.98 | 10.81 ± 1.94 | |
P | 0.002 | 0.000 | ||
F | 7.075 | 9.500 |
Table 6 Differences in the number of D2 lymph nodes dissected and the number of black stains at different preoperative labeling times in laparoscopic total gastrectomy and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy
Labeling time (d) | Cases | Average number of dissected lymph nodes | Average number of black staining lymph nodes | |
LTG | 30 | 12.27 ± 2.46 | 3.07 ± 1.09 | 30 |
36 | 14.47 ± 1.64 | 4.14 ± 1.46 | 36 | |
33 | 14.64 ± 1.88 | 4.45 ± 1.28 | 33 | |
0.000 | 0.000 | |||
13.262 | 9.522 | |||
LSG | 0 | 16 | 11.50 ± 2.12 | 2.75 ± 1.15 |
1 | 34 | 12.53 ± 2.39 | 4.74 ± 1.85 | |
2 | 31 | 13.32 ± 1.71 | 4.42 ± 1.64 | |
P | 0.024 | 0.001 | ||
F | 3.891 | 7.906 |
- Citation: Zhao K, Shan BQ, Gao YP, Xu JY. Role of carbon nanotracers in lymph node dissection of advanced gastric cancer and the selection of preoperative labeling time. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(3): 870-881
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i3/870.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.870