PDCA nursing in improving quality management efficacy in endoscopic submucosal dissection

Table 1 Comparison of time of hospitalization and hospitalization costs between

Groups	Time of hospitalization (d)	Hospitalization costs (Ten thousand)
Research group (n = 98)	4.39 ± 1.03	1.79 ± 0.03
Control group (n = 80)	5.69 ± 1.06	2.64 ± 0.05
t value	8.249	140.234
P value	0.000	0.000

the two groups of people with disabilities

Table 2 Comparison of visual analog scale scores before and after care in the two groups

Groups	VAS scores		t value	P value
	Before	After
Research group (n = 98)	7.55 ± 0.50	4.94 ± 0.24	84.954	0.000
Control group (n = 80)	7.60 ± 0.49	6.16 ± 0.37	43.173	0.000
t value	0.654	26.508
P value	0.514	0.000

VAS: Visual analog scale.

Table 3 Comparison of the 36-item Shot-Form Health Survey scores in the two groups after care

Groups	Physical function (score)	Role status (score)	Social function (score)	Pain (score)	Mental health (score)	Physical condition (score)
Research group (n = 98)	69.23 ± 5.12	75.06 ± 6.01	63.12 ± 4.23	70.24 ± 5.13	79.22 ± 7.03	64.15 ± 6.13
Control group (n = 80)	60.23 ± 6.12	68.23 ± 6.12	60.13 ± 5.19	65.23 ± 6.03	72.06 ± 7.04	58.23 ± 6.17
t value	10.697	7.480	4.235	5.989	6.755	6.397
P value	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000

Table 4 Comparison of Zung scale scores between the two groups of people with disabilities after care

Groups	Depression scores	Anxiety scores
Research group (n = 98)	36.22 ± 4.06	47.16 ± 5.13
Control group (n = 80)	50.23 ± 4.16	53.26 ± 5.17
t value	22.638	7.864
P value	0.000	0.000

Table 5 Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups of people with disabilities, n (%)

Groups	Infection	Tissue damage	Overall incidence
Research group (n = 98)	4	2	6 (6.12)
Control group (n = 80)	10	5	15 (18.75)
t value			6.749
P value			0.009