Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 14, 2022; 10(2): 469-476
Published online Jan 14, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.469
Table 1 Relationship between the expression of different Ki-67 proteins and characteristics of gastric stromal tumors, n (%)
Index
Ki-67 Protein positive (n = 54)
Ki-67 Protein negative (n =32)
χ2
P value
Age (yr)1.173 0.279
≥ 6029 (53.70)21 (65.63)
< 6025 (46.30)11 (34.38)
Gender0.844 0.358
Male24 (44.44)11 (34.38)
Female30 (55.56)21 (65.63)
Lesion site1.250 0.535
Gastric antrum7 (12.96)5 (15.63)
Body of stomach14 (25.93)5 (15.63)
Base of stomach33 (61.11)22 (68.75)
Risk classification7.380 0.025
Very low risk15 (27.78)17 (53.13)
Low risk26 (48.15)13 (40.63)
Medium and high risk13 (24.07)2 (6.25)
Mitosis5.156 0.023
≤ 533 (61.11)27 (84.38)
> 521 (38.89)5 (15.63)
Lesion diameter (cm)1.764 0.184
> 2.0 cm38 (70.37)18 (56.25)
≤ 2.0 cm16 (29.63)14 (43.75)
Table 2 Relationship between the expression of different CD44 proteins and characteristics of gastric stromal tumors, n (%)
Index
CD44 protein positive (n = 59)
CD44 protein negative (n = 27)
χ2
P value
Age (yr)1.176 0.278
≥ 6032 (54.24)18 (66.67)
< 6027 (45.76)9 (33.33)
Gender0.884 0.347
Male26 (44.07)9 (33.33)
Female33 (55.93)18 (66.67)
Lesion site1.283 0.256
Gastric antrum7 (11.86)5 (18.52)
Body of stomach12 (20.34)7 (25.93)
Base of stomach40 (67.80)15 (55.56)
Risk classification6.5340.038
Very low risk18 (30.51)14 (51.85)
Low risk27 (45.76)12 (44.44)
Medium and high risk14 (23.73)1 (3.70)
Mitosis6.8220.009
≤ 536 (61.02)24 (88.89)
> 523 (38.98)3 (11.11)
Lesion diameter (cm)1.5840.208
> 2.0 cm41 (69.49)15 (55.56)
≤ 2.0 cm18 (30.51)12 (44.44)
Table 3 Comparison of microvessel density in gastric stromal tumor tissues with different expression of Ki-67 and CD 44 protein (mean ± SD)

n
MVD (/Hp)
t
P value
Ki-67 expression0.8890.377
Positive5415.41 ± 3.10
Negative3214.82 ± 2.75
CD44 expression3.0030.004
Positive5915.92 ± 2.94
Negative2713.86 ± 2.98