Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 6, 2022; 10(10): 3060-3068
Published online Apr 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3060
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups
Normal information
Therapy group (n = 41)
Control group (n = 41)
t/χ2
P value
Age (yr)30.5 ± 3.129.9 ± 3.50.8220.414
BMI (kg/m2)27.7 ± 4.926.6 ± 4.21.0910.278
Course of disease (mo)31.0 ± 7.132.0 ± 8.4-0.5820.562
Exercise less (%)28 (68.29)28 (68.29)0.0001.000
Stay up late (%)32 (78.05)35 (85.37)0.7340.391
Spicy food (%)31 (75.61)30 (73.17)0.0640.800
Greasy (%)27 (65.85)32 (78.05)1.5110.219
Favorite sweets (%)27 (65.85)31 (75.61)0.9430.332
Like cold drinks (%)26 (63.41)21 (51.22)1.2460.264
Salty taste (%)15 (36.59)9 (21.95)2.1210.145
Bitter taste (%)7 (17.07)6 (14.63)0.0910.762
Sour taste (%)7 (17.07)3 (7.32)1.8220.177
Regular diet (%)7 (17.07)7 (17.07)0.0001.000
Obesity in childhood or adolescence (%)22 (53.66)18 (43.9)0.7810.377
Long time stress (%)15 (36.59)11 (26.83)0.9010.342
Family history of diabetes (%)25 (60.98)22 (53.66)0.4490.503
Table 2 Comparison of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores, acne scores, and hair scores between the two groups before and after treatment (mean ± SD, scores)
Index
Time
Therapy group (n = 37)
Control group (n = 37)
t
P value
TCM syndrome scoreBefore treatment29.32 ± 7.6627.84 ± 7.200.8560.395
After treatment11.24 ± 3.7224.29 ± 6.03-11.2040.000
Acne scoreBefore treatment1.41 ± 0.561.56 ± 0.59-1.1220.266
After treatment0.56 ± 0.211.26 ± 0.38-9.8070.000
Hair scoreBefore treatment12.10 ± 3.9011.10 ± 4.611.0070.317
After treatment11.30 ± 2.7010.79 ± 2.860.7890.433
Table 3 Comparison of reproductive hormone levels between the two groups before and after treatment (mean ± SD)
Index
Time
Therapy group (n = 37)
Control group (n = 37)
t
P value
T (ng/mL)Before treatment0.56 ± 0.180.64 ± 0.24-1.6220.109
After treatment0.39 ± 0.110.42 ± 0.12-1.1210.266
LH (mIU/mL)Before treatment9.68 ± 2.3110.70 ± 2.63-1.7720.081
After treatment8.02 ± 1.829.44 ± 7.66-1.0970.276
FSH (mIU/mL)Before treatment5.88 ± 1.226.46 ± 1.81-1.6160.110
After treatment5.42 ± 1.365.84 ± 1.59-1.2210.226
LH/FSHBefore treatment1.80 ± 0.461.96 ± 0.58-1.3150.193
After treatment1.48 ± 0.622.14 ± 0.77-4.0610.000
Table 4 Traditional Chinese medicine syndrome curative effect index between the two groups after treatment, n (%)
Group
n
Clinical recovery
Markedly effective
Effective
Invalid
Total effective rate
Therapy group37141012136 (97.30)
Control group3735121720 (54.05)
χ218.794
P value0.000
Table 5 Comparison of the comprehensive effect between the two groups of patients before and after treatment, n (%)
Group
n
Clinical recovery
Markedly effective
Effective
Invalid
Total effective rate
Therapy group37141010334 (91.89)
Control group3735121720 (54.05)
χ213.430
P value0.000