Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2021; 9(21): 5932-5942
Published online Jul 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i21.5932
Figure 1
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 1 Study selection flow diagram (up to July 2020). CBM: Chinese Biological Medical database; CNKI: China National Knowledge Infrastructure; VIP: China Science and Technology Journal database; WF: WANFANG DATA database.
Figure 2
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 2 Forest plot of cancer-related fatigue prevalence in prostate cancer patients. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 Forest plot of the prevalence of cancer-related fatigue in prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 4
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 4 Forest plot of the prevalence of cancer-related fatigue in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 5 Forest plot of the prevalence of cancer-related fatigue in prostate cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 6
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 6 Forest plot of acute fatigue prevalence in prostate cancer patients. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 7
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 7 Forest plot of persistent fatigue prevalence in prostate cancer patients. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 8
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 8  Egger’s funnel plots for testing publication bias.
Figure 9
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 9 Sensitivity analysis of cancer-related fatigue prevalence in prostate cancer patients in all studies. CI: Confidence interval.