Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2022; 10(15): 4856-4877
Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4856
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Risk of bias graph with the studies comparing Chinese herbal medicine with PEG/mosapride/lactulose/phenolphthalein/probiotics/placebo for the treatment of FC.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plot of randomized controlled trials in patients with functional constipation comparing Chinese herbal medicine with PEG/mosapride/lactulose/ phenolphthalein/ probiotics/ placebo. Odds ratio (95%CIs) for effective rate are shown.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Forest plot of randomized controlled trials in patients with functional constipation comparing Chinese herbal medicine with PEG/mosapride/lactulose/probiotics/placebo. Mean differences (95%CIs) for bowel movement are shown.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Comparison of Chinese herbal medicine vs Chinese herbal medicine with PEG/ lactulose/ placebo. Odds ratio (95%CIs) for recurrence rate are shown.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Forest plot of high-quality randomized controlled trials in patients with functional constipation. Odds ratio (95%CIs) for effective rate are shown.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Comparison of Cannabis Fructusvs western medicine. Odds ratio (95%CIs) for effective rate are shown.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Comparison of cistanchevs western medicine. Odds ratio (95%CIs) for effective rate are shown.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Funnel plots of comparison between Chinese herbal medicine and western medicine.