Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2020; 8(22): 5555-5563
Published online Nov 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5555
Published online Nov 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5555
Sonographic features of umbilical vein recanalization for a Rex shunt on cavernous transformation of portal vein in children
Yu-Qing Zhang, Mei Wu, Ya Li, Xiu-Liang Wei, Fei-Xue Zhang, Department of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, China
Qing Wang, Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China
Yan Li, Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, China
Guang-Rui Shao, Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, China
Juan Xiao, Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, China
Author contributions: Zhang YQ wrote the manuscript, performed procedures and analyzed the data; Wang Q wrote the manuscript, drafted conception and helped design the research; Wu M designed the research, performed examinations and revised the manuscript; Li Y, Wei XL, Zhang FX, Li Y and Shao GR collected and interpreted data; Xiao J analyzed the data; All authors participated in performing the research.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. KYLL-2020(LW)-050.
Informed consent statement: The legal guardians of all study participants provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors state that they have nothing to disclose.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Mei Wu, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, China. a_may0212@163.com
Received: August 20, 2020
Peer-review started: August 20, 2020
First decision: September 13, 2020
Revised: September 16, 2020
Accepted: October 1, 2020
Article in press: October 1, 2020
Published online: November 26, 2020
Processing time: 97 Days and 14 Hours
Peer-review started: August 20, 2020
First decision: September 13, 2020
Revised: September 16, 2020
Accepted: October 1, 2020
Article in press: October 1, 2020
Published online: November 26, 2020
Processing time: 97 Days and 14 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: Recanalized umbilical vein as a conduit for a Rex shunt was recently used to treat cavernous transformation of the portal vein. Fifteen children who received a recanalized umbilical vein as a conduit for a Rex shunt were included in group I, and the remaining 32 children who received a classic Rex shunt were included in group II. There was no difference in patency rate between the two groups after 3 mo of treatments. Diameter and flow velocity of bypass vessels in both two groups increased, and blood flow into the liver of both groups increased 3 mo after surgery.