An BJ, Wang YT, Zhao Z, Wang MX, Xing GY. Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of all-inside and traditional techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(14): 3195-3203 [PMID: 37274047 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3195]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Geng-Yan Xing, FCCP, Dean, Director, Doctor, Professor, Surgeon, Department of Sports Medicine, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, No. 51 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100000, China. xinggengyan123@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2023; 11(14): 3195-3203 Published online May 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i14.3195
Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of all-inside and traditional techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Bai-Jing An, Yao-Ting Wang, Zhe Zhao, Ming-Xin Wang, Geng-Yan Xing
Bai-Jing An, Yao-Ting Wang, Zhe Zhao, Ming-Xin Wang, Geng-Yan Xing, Department of Sports Medicine, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
Author contributions: Xing GY designed the research study; Wang YT, Zhao Z and Wang MX performed the research; An BJ analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital Institutional Review Board, No. KY2021-040.
Informed consent statement: All study participants or their legal guardian provided informed written consent about personal and medical data collection prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report having no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: Technical appendix, statistical code, and dataset available from the corresponding author at xinggengyan123@163.com.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Geng-Yan Xing, FCCP, Dean, Director, Doctor, Professor, Surgeon, Department of Sports Medicine, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, No. 51 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100000, China. xinggengyan123@163.com
Received: November 20, 2022 Peer-review started: November 20, 2022 First decision: February 14, 2023 Revised: March 5, 2023 Accepted: April 4, 2023 Article in press: April 4, 2023 Published online: May 16, 2023 Processing time: 176 Days and 22.5 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: This study retrospectively analyzed 80 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries who underwent all-inside quadrupled semitendinosus (AIST) or traditional hamstring tendon (TBT). We demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the time between surgery and injury, operative duration, International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores of the affected knee. However, there were significant differences in visual analogue scale scores 1 d, 3 d, 7 d, 2 wk and 1 mo after surgery (P < 0.05). These results indicated the efficacy of the AIST ACL reconstruction technique was comparable to the TBT technique, but the postoperative pain was less with the AIST technique. Thus, the AIST technique is a better choice for ACL reconstruction.
