When should endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis transection Glissonean pedicle not be used in hepatectomy? A case report

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8742

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 10, Issue 24

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2239)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

101

WORD

116

HTML

928

Figures (1-2)

308

Tables (1-1)

226

Sum=1679

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

211

Download

349

Sum=560

Aug 26, 2022 (publication date) through Apr 28, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Case Report

World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2022; 10(24): 8742-8748
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8742

When should endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis transection Glissonean pedicle not be used in hepatectomy? A case report

Jian Zhao, Yan-Li Dang

Jian Zhao, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China

Yan-Li Dang, Department of Obstetrics, First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China

Author contributions: Zhao J and Dang YL designed this report; Zhao J wrote the paper.

Supported by Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province, No. 202101AY070001-282.

Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report.

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).

Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Corresponding author: Yan-Li Dang, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Department of Obstetrics, First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, No. 157 Jinbi Road, Wuhua District, Kunming 650000, Yunnan Province, China. happylife210@163.com

Received: March 20, 2022
Peer-review started: March 20, 2022
First decision: April 13, 2022
Revised: April 16, 2022
Accepted: July 20, 2022
Article in press: July 20, 2022
Published online: August 26, 2022

Core Tip

Core Tip: There have been few reports on post-hepatectomy bile duct injury (PHBDI). In this report, we present a case of PHBDI caused by the wrong choice of transection tool, such as endovascular gastrointestinal anastomosis (endo-GIA), which was successfully saved by reoperation. We wanted to draw attention to the fact that not all cases are suitable for endo-GIA transection of Glissonean pedicle.