Published online Aug 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3209
Peer-review started: April 14, 2020
First decision: May 15, 2020
Revised: May 25, 2020
Accepted: July 14, 2020
Article in press: July 14, 2020
Published online: August 6, 2020
Processing time: 113 Days and 23.1 Hours
If postoperative weight control is not good, some patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) will experience rebound symptoms after surgery. Currently, the common measures for controlling the weight mainly include diet control, increase exercise and so on. Conventional postoperative intervention focuses on the health education, but the compliance of patient weight control after surgery is poor.
Motivational interviewing (MI) could mobilize the initiative of obese patients with OSAHS after surgery, making them fully understand the harm of obesity. Also, by combining with personalized weight control scheme to effectively control weight, the surgical treatment effect of obese OSAHS patients could be well promoted, thus finally reducing and controlling the occurrence of complications.
This research aimed to explore the effect of motivational interviewing on postoperative weight control in obesity patients with OSAHS.
A case-control study was performed. From March 2018 to March 2019, 100 postoperative patients with OSAHS were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was given routine health education after the operation; in addition to the regular health education, the intervention group was given MI according to a predetermined plan. Obesity-related indicators, postoperative complications, and the sleep status of both groups were evaluated before and 6 mo after the intervention.
Patients in the intervention group had significantly improved body weight, BMI, and waist and neck circumference compared with patients in the control group. Regarding complications at 6 mo after operation, the incidence of cough and reflux in patients in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group. In addition, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Self-Rating Scale of Sleep scores of patients in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group, and the sleep status of patients in the intervention group was improved.
MI intervention has a significant advantage compared to the postoperative routine health education. It can greatly change the lifestyle of OSAHS patients, further control the postoperative weight of patients, reduce the occurrence of complications in patients, improve patients’ quality of sleep, and improve long-term postoperative efficacy.
Our research results show that MI for 6 mo could effectively control the postoperative weight of obesity patients with OSAHS, and reduce the complications. If the long-term intervention effect is to be observed, the follow-up time should be extended.