Published online Jun 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2520
Peer-review started: December 30, 2019
First decision: April 1, 2020
Revised: April 24, 2020
Accepted: May 20, 2020
Article in press: May 20, 2020
Published online: June 26, 2020
Processing time: 176 Days and 22.3 Hours
Recent innovations in intensive care have improved the prognosis of patients with severe brain injuries and brought more patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC). The most important concern for DoC patients and their family is prognosis because it is central to the decisions regarding medical treatment and eventual rehabilitation therapy, and profound ethical issues are involved. In China, the accessibility to proper management services for DoC patients is a major issue.
Data are lacking regarding the long-term outcomes of DoC patients in China. It is necessary to study the long-term outcomes of patients in prolonged DoC in light of many factors likely to influence crucial decisions about their care and their life.
The study aimed to assess the recovery rate of the inpatients with prolonged DoC after the standard follow-up, hoping to investigate the factors associated with a higher likelihood to recover consciousness at rehabilitation facilities in China and further our understanding of the rehabilitation potential of the most severely affected patients with DoC.
This was a two-center prospective cohort study of inpatients with vegetative state (VS)/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS). The study outcomes were the recovery from VS/UWS to minimally conscious state (MCS) and the long-term status of patients with prolonged DoC considered in VS/UWS or MCS for up to 6 years. The patients were evaluated using the Glasgow coma scale (GCS), coma recovery scale-revised, and Glasgow outcome scale. The endpoint of follow-up was recovery of full consciousness or death. The changes in the primary clinical outcome improvement in clinical diagnosis were evaluated at 12 mo compared with baseline.
The study population included 93 patients (62 VS/UWS and 31 MCS). At the endpoint, 33 transitioned to an emergence from MCS or full consciousness, eight had a locked-in syndrome, and there were 35 patients remaining in a VS/UWS and 11 in an MCS. Compared with the unresponsive group, the responsive group had a higher proportion of males, shorter time from injury, higher frequency of vascular etiology, higher Glasgow coma scale score and coma recovery scale-revised score at admission, lower frequency of VS/UWS, and more favorable Glasgow outcome scale outcome.
Patients with severe DoC, despite having strong predictors of poor prognosis, might recover consciousness after a prolonged time of rehabilitation. An accurate initial diagnosis of patients with DoC is critical for predicting outcome and a long-term regular follow-up is also important.
This preliminary study indicates that establishing a rehabilitation-based registry for patients with severe DoC after brain injury is feasible and probably relevant to improve patient management.