Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4110
Peer-review started: September 1, 2021
First decision: November 11, 2021
Revised: November 23, 2021
Accepted: March 16, 2022
Article in press: March 16, 2022
Published online: May 6, 2022
Processing time: 241 Days and 4.9 Hours
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) provides good perioperative protection for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, perioperative cardiac injury related to CPB remains a severe complication in these patients and affects their prognosis.
Inflammation and oxidative stress play an important role in the CPB-related heart injury, and clinical observations have confirmed the protective effect of Xuebijing injection (XBJ) on multiple organs against inflammatory damage.
To evaluate the potential efficacy of XBJ on cardiac injury during CPB.
Sixty patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB in our center between November 1, 2018 and February 1, 2019 were included. XBJ was injected intravenously 3 times: 12 h before the operation, at the beginning of the operation, and 12 h after the second injection. The heart function was assessed by echocardiography 48 h after the operation. Markers related to circulatory inflammation and oxidative stress were measured and clinical results at intensive care unit (ICU) were recorded.
All the 60 patients were successfully weaned from CPB and transferred to the ICU. Compared to the control group, XBJ improved PaO2/FiO2 and cardiac systolic function, but reduced troponin I and creatine kinase fraction after surgery (all P < 0.05). Moreover, the circulating concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-8 in the XBJ group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P < 0.05), whereas the circulating concentration of IL-10 was significantly higher in the XBJ group (P < 0.05). In addition, the lengths of ICU stay and hospitalization after surgery tended to be shorter in the XBJ group than in the control group, although the differences were not statistically significant.
Perioperative administration of XBJ was associated with attenuated cardiac injury during the CPB surgery, likely via anti-inflammation– and anti-oxidation–related mechanisms.
Further research is required with more meaningful data to accurately evaluate the efficacy of XBJ on cardiac injury during CPB, and clarify the mechanism of action of XBJ.