Published online Dec 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i35.12928
Peer-review started: October 18, 2022
First decision: November 4, 2022
Revised: November 18, 2022
Accepted: November 24, 2022
Article in press: November 24, 2022
Published online: December 16, 2022
Processing time: 56 Days and 20.7 Hours
Disc herniation (DH) is a fragment of the disc nucleus that is pushed out of the annulus into the spinal canal due to a tear or rupture in the annulus. It is a common cause of lumbar and leg pains. Substantial advancements have been made to determine the cause of DH and to ensure accurate diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of this condition. Total endoscopic discectomy is an alternative surgical technique that is less invasive.
To study the optimal approach for a total endoscopic discectomy and its influence on lumbar and leg function in DH patients.
This prospective study enrolled 120 patients with lumbar DH who were treated in our hospital from February 2018 to January 2021. All patients were randomly divided into the following two groups: The observation group, comprising 62 patients who underwent surgery using the interlaminar approach, and the control group, comprising 58 patients who were operated through the foramina approach. The treatment effects, perioperative indicators, functional recovery, pain, and quality of life were compared between the two groups.
The treatment effect in the observation group (93.55%) was significantly better than that in the control group (77.59%). There was no difference in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss amount between the two groups (P > 0.05). The hospitalization time of the observation group (4.34 ± 1.33 d) was significantly shorter than that of the control group (5.38 ± 1.57 days) (P < 0.05). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Oswestry Disability Index scores decreased significantly in both groups after treatment, but the scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group. The visual analog scale scores of the lower back and legs of the two groups were significantly reduced after treatment, but scores were lower in the observation group (2.18 ± 0.88 in the lower back and 1.42 ± 0.50 in the leg) than in the control group (3.53 ± 0.50 in the lower back and 2.21 ± 0.52 in the leg). A short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 measurement scale (AIMS2-SF) score and Barthel index of the lower back of the two groups increased significantly after treatment, with the observation group having a significantly higher AIMS2-SF score (95.16 ± 1.74) and Barthel index (97.29 ± 1.75) than the control group (84.95 ± 2.14 and 89.16 ± 2.71, respectively) (P < 0.05).
Through total endoscopic discectomy with the interlaminar approach, the degree of pain in the waist and leg was reduced, and the lumbar function considerably recovered.
Core Tip: To study the optimal approach for a total endoscopic discectomy and its influence on leg and lumbar function in patients with disc herniation. Altogether, 120 patients with lumbar disc herniation were enrolled in this trial, including 62 patients who were operated through the interlaminar approach (observation group) and 58 who were operated through the foramina approach (control group). The therapeutic effect was evaluated according to various indicators, including the visual analog scale scores and Oswestry Disability Index. Our study showed that the treatment effect of total endoscopic discectomy using an interlaminar approach was remarkable.