Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2022; 10(32): 11712-11725
Published online Nov 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11712
Comparing the efficacy of different dexamethasone regimens for maintenance treatment of multiple myeloma in standard-risk patients non-eligible for transplantation
Sai-Ling Hu, Min Liu, Jun-Yu Zhang
Sai-Ling Hu, Department of Cardiology, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang Province, China
Min Liu, Jun-Yu Zhang, Department of Hematology, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang Province, China
Author contributions: Zhang JY designed the report and wrote the paper; Hu SL collected the patient’s clinical data and revised the paper; Liu M analyzed the data; all authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Supported by the Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province Health Commission, No. 2020ZH013.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee of the Lishui Municipal Central Hospital.
Informed consent statement: Written informed consent was obtained from each patient or family member.
Conflict-of-interest statement: There are no conflicts of interest to report.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Jun-Yu Zhang, MM, Chief Doctor, Department of Hematology, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, No. 289 KuoCang Road, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang Province, China. zhangjunyu815@163.com
Received: June 20, 2022
Peer-review started: June 20, 2022
First decision: September 5, 2022
Revised: September 13, 2022
Accepted: October 18, 2022
Article in press: October 18, 2022
Published online: November 16, 2022
Processing time: 140 Days and 23.2 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy, while MM outcomes have significantly improved due to novel agents and combinations, MM remains an incurable disease. The key goal of treatment in MM is to achieve a maximal response and the subsequent consolidation of response after initial therapy. Many studies analyzed an improved progression-free survival (PFS) following lenalidomide alone maintenance versus placebo or observation after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with NDMM. In the SWOG S0777 clinical trial, patients newly diagnosed with MM (NDMM) without ASCT received lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (DXM) maintenance until progressive disease, where PFS and overall survival (OS) were significantly improved. In the present study, we assessed the efficacy and toxicity of the different doses of DXM combined with lenalidomide for maintenance treatment of NDMM for transplant noneligible patients in the standard-risk group.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of different administration modes of DXM combined with lenalidomide for maintenance treatment of MM in standard-risk patients ineligible for transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 96 MM patients were enrolled in this study, among whom 48 patients received maintenance treatment that consisted of oral administration of 25 milligrams (mg) of lenalidomide from days 1-21 and 40 mg of DXM on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (DXM 40 mg group), repeated every 4 wk. Another group was treated with oral administration of 25 mg of lenalidomide from days 1-21 and 20 mg of DXM on days 1-2, 8-9, 15-16, and 22-23 (DXM 20 mg group), which was also repeated every 4 wk.

RESULTS

The median PFS was 37.25 mo in the DXM 40.00 mg group and 38.17 mo in the DXM 20 mg group (P = 0.171). The median OS was 50.78 mo in the DXM 40 mg group and 51.69 mo in the DXM 20 mg group (P = 0.171). Fourteen patients in the DXM 40 mg group and 6 patients in the DXM 20 mg group suffered from adverse gastrointestinal reactions after the oral administration of the DXM tablet (P = 0.044). Ten patients suffered from abnormal glucose tolerance (GTA), impaired fasting glucose (IFG), or diabetes mellitus in the DXM 40 mg group during our observation time compared to 19 patients with GTA, IFG, or DM in the DXM 20 mg group (P = 0.033). Abnormal β-crosslaps or higher were found in 5 patients in the DXM 40 mg group and 12 patients in the DXM 20 mg group (P = 0.049). Insomnia or an increase in insomnia compared to the previous condition was evident in 2 patients in the DXM 40 mg group after maintenance treatment for more than 6 mo compared to 11 patients in the DXM 20 mg group (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

The DXM 40 mg group exhibited efficacy similar to that of the DXM 20 mg group. However, the DXM 40 mg group had significantly decreased toxicity compared with the DXM 20 mg group in the long term.

Keywords: Dexamethasone; Maintenance treatment; Multiple myeloma; Efficacy; Toxicity

Core Tip: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy. MM treatment includes induction therapy, consolidation therapy, and maintenance therapy. Based on the past clinical activities, we discovered that a part of patients suffered from serious adverse gastrointestinal reactions after oral administration of 40 mg dexamethasone (DXM) once every week. Consequently, we divided DXM 40 mg administered once a day into 20 mg continuously administered over two days, after which we compared the efficacy and toxicity in DXM 40 mg and 20 mg group as maintenance. The two groups have equally efficience as maintenance treatment in standard-risk patients’ non-eligible for transplantation. However, DXM 40 mg once per day per week exhibited a higher incidence rate in adverse gastrointestinal reactions in short-term, but lower non-hematological toxicity in the long-term contained bone lost, abnormal of blood glucose and insomnia. DXM 40 mg once per day every week may be safer and lead to a better quality of life.