Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2022; 10(22): 7728-7737
Published online Aug 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7728
Clinical performance evaluation of O-Ring Halcyon Linac: A real-world study
Guang-Yu Wang, Qi-Zhen Zhu, He-Ling Zhu, Ling-Juan Jiang, Nan Zhao, Zhi-Kai Liu, Fu-Quan Zhang
Guang-Yu Wang, Qi-Zhen Zhu, He-Ling Zhu, Zhi-Kai Liu, Fu-Quan Zhang, Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Ling-Juan Jiang, Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Nan Zhao, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Author contributions: Wang GY designed and performed the research and wrote the paper; Liu ZK and Zhang FQ designed the research and supervised the report; Zhu QZ and Zhu HL performed the research; Jiang LJ and Zhao N supervised the report.
Supported by the National Foundation for Education Sciences Planning, No. BLA 200216; and the National Key Research and Development Plan, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, No. 2016YFC0105207.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (No. S-K1883).
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrolment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interest.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Zhi-Kai Liu, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China. liuzk2009@126.com
Received: January 6, 2022
Peer-review started: January 6, 2022
First decision: February 8, 2022
Revised: March 7, 2022
Accepted: June 13, 2022
Article in press: June 13, 2022
Published online: August 6, 2022
Processing time: 196 Days and 16.8 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy, especially the development of linear accelerators, plays a key role in cancer management. The fast-rotating coplanar O-ring Halcyon Linac has demonstrated many advantages. The previous literature has mainly focused on the machine parameters and plan quality of Halcyon, with a lack of relevant research on its clinical application.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical performance of the O-ring Halcyon treatment system in a real-world application setting.

METHODS

Data from sixty-one patients who were treated with the Halcyon system throughout the entire radiotherapy process in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between August 2019 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the target tumour response to radiotherapy and irradiation toxicity from 1 to 3 mo after treatment. Dosimetric verification of Halcyon plans was performed using a quality assurance procedure, including portal dosimetry, ArcCHECK and point dose measurements for verification of the system delivery accuracy.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients in the five groups, 16, 12, 7 and 26 patients had complete response, partial response, progressive disease and stable disease, respectively. No increase in the irradiated target tumour volume was observed when separately evaluating the local response. Regarding irradiation toxicity, no radiation-induced deaths were observed. Thirty-eight percent (23/61 patients) had no radiation toxicity after radiotherapy, 56% (34/61 patients) experienced radiation toxicity that resolved after treatment, and 6% (4/61 patients) had irreversible adverse reactions. The average gamma passing rates with a 2% dose difference and 2-mm distance to agreement for IMRT/VMAT/SRT plans were ArcCHECK at 96.4% and portal dosimetry at 96.7%, respectively. All of the validated clinical plans were within 3% for point dose measurements, and Halcyon’s ArcCHECK demonstrated a high pass rate of 99.1% ± 1.1% for clinical gamma passing criteria of 3%/3 mm.

CONCLUSION

The O-ring Halcyon Linac could achieve a better therapeutic effect on the target volume by providing accurate treatment delivery plans with tolerable irradiation toxicity.

Keywords: Halcyon; Response evaluation; Irradiation toxicity; Dosimetric verification

Core Tip: The fast-rotating coplanar O-ring Halcyon Linac has demonstrated many advantages in radiation therapy. Unlike previous studies, which focused more on the machine parameters and quality control aspects of the O-ring Halcyon Linac, our institution evaluated Halcyon more from the perspective of practical clinical applications concerning radiotherapy effects and irradiation toxicity. The O-ring Halcyon Linac can generate desired treatment plans that meet clinically accepted constraints, pass routine patient-specific quality assurance for delivery accuracy verification, and present acceptable radiation toxicity under prospective yield.