Published online May 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i14.4414
Peer-review started: November 21, 2021
First decision: December 9, 2021
Revised: December 19, 2021
Accepted: March 14, 2022
Article in press: March 14, 2022
Published online: May 16, 2022
To ensure clinical efficacy and prolong patient survival, treatments such as surgery and microwave ablation (MWA) are used for early liver cancer. MWA is preferred because it effectively preserves the normal liver tissue and causes transient coagulation necrosis of local liver tumor cells. However, due to technical limitations, the cancerous liver tissue cannot be completely ablated; therefore, the probability of local tumor recurrence is high.
To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA in the treatment of small liver cancer.
A total of 118 patients treated for small liver cancer in The Central Hospital of Yongzhou from January 2018 to April 2019 were selected. Sixty-six patients received ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA (MWA group) and 52 received laparoscopic surgery (laparoscope group). The operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and medical expenses of both groups were statistically analyzed. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), albumin (ALB), alpha fetal protein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and peripheral blood regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg) levels were evaluated pre- and post-operatively. The cross-sectional area of tumors measured before and after ablation was analyzed statistically; the therapeutic effect was compared between both groups in terms of surgical complications, 2-year progression-free survival rate, and overall survival rate.
The operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and medical expenses in the MWA group were lower than those of the laparoscope group, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05); these parameters, and ALT, AST, TBIL, and ALB levels were compared preoperatively between both groups, and there was no significance (P > 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and medical expenses for 2 d and 1 wk after surgery, the ALT and AST of the MWA group were lower than those of the laparoscope group, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and medical expenses, and serum AFP, CEA, and Treg levels were measured preoperatively and 4 and 8 wk postoperatively, and there were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with preoperative levels, serum AFP, CEA, and Treg levels in both groups were decreased (P < 0.05). The lesion in the MWA group had a maximum area of 4.86 ± 0.90 cm2, 1.24 ± 0.57 cm2, and 0.31 ± 0.11 cm2 preoperatively, 1 and 3 mo postoperatively, respectively. Fifty-eight of them achieved complete response and eight achieved a partial response. After 2 years of follow-up, the progression-free and overall survival rates in the MWA group were 37.88% and 66.67%, respectively, compared with 44.23% and 76.92% in the laparoscope group, with no significant difference (P > 0.05).
The effects of ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA in the treatment of small liver cancer are similar to those of laparoscopic surgery. However, ablation causes less trauma and liver dysfunction.
Core Tip: Through a set of controls, it was confirmed that the effect of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation in the treatment of small liver cancer is similar to that of laparoscopic surgery. However, ablation will also cause less trauma and liver dysfunction, so there is more room for development in clinical applications.