Ren SX, Zhang Q, Li PP, Wang XD. Difference and similarity between type A interrupted aortic arch and aortic coarctation in adults: Two case reports. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(11): 3472-3477 [PMID: 35611201 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i11.3472]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Xiao-Dong Wang, MM, Doctor, Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, No. 55 Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China. 287238197@qq.com
Research Domain of This Article
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Article-Type of This Article
Case Report
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Apr 16, 2022; 10(11): 3472-3477 Published online Apr 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i11.3472
Difference and similarity between type A interrupted aortic arch and aortic coarctation in adults: Two case reports
Si-Xie Ren, Qian Zhang, Pan-Pan Li, Xiao-Dong Wang
Si-Xie Ren, Pan-Pan Li, Department of Radiology, Chengdu Second People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China
Qian Zhang, Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi Province, China
Xiao-Dong Wang, Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China
Author contributions: Ren SX and Li PP reviewed the literature and contributed to manuscript drafting; Zhang Q provided the image processing and interpretation and contributed to manuscript drafting; Wang XD was responsible for revising the manuscript for important intellectual content; all authors provided final approval for the version to be submitted.
Informed consent statement: Informed written consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xiao-Dong Wang, MM, Doctor, Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, No. 55 Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China. 287238197@qq.com
Received: July 12, 2021 Peer-review started: July 12, 2021 First decision: November 19, 2021 Revised: December 2, 2021 Accepted: February 27, 2022 Article in press: February 27, 2022 Published online: April 16, 2022 Processing time: 270 Days and 8.3 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Aortic coarctation (CoA) is usually confused with interrupted aortic arch (IAA), especially adult type A interrupted aortic arch, due to their similar anatomical location. Although the main difference between them is whether arterial lumen exhibits continuity or not, the clinical manifestations are similar and connection exists between them. Adult type A IAA is considered as an extreme form of CoA, which is complete discontinuity of aortic function and lumen caused by degenerative arterial coarctation. This paper reports two cases (interrupted aortic arch and severe aortic coarctation) to analyze the difference and similarity between them.
CASE SUMMARY
The two cases of patients presented with hypertension for many years. Computed tomography angiography showed that the aortic arch and descending aorta were discontinuous or significantly narrowed with extensive collateral flow. The IAA patient refused surgical treatment and blood pressure could be controlled with drugs. While the CoA patient underwent stent implantation because of uncontrollable hypertension, the blood flow recovered smoothly and the blood pressures at both ends of the stenosis returned to normal after surgery.
CONCLUSION
Adult type A IAA and CoA have difference and similarity, and type A IAA is associated with CoA to a certain extent. The treatment method should be chosen based on the patient's clinical symptoms rather than the severity of the lesion.
Core Tip: According to the characteristics of aortic coarctation and interrupted aortic arch, this paper highlights the difference and similarity between them. The treatment method should be based on the patient's clinical symptoms rather than the severity of the lesion.
