Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2022; 14(4): 833-841
Published online Apr 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i4.833
Table 1 Comparing the three main surgical options in familial adenomatosis polyposis[6,30,39-41]
Surgical procedure
Indications
Benefits
Pitfalls
Ileo-rectal anastomosis< 20 rectal, adenomas; < 1000 colonic, adenomasControls colonic polyposis. Better bowel function & good quality of life. Reduced risk of desmoid disease. Avoids stoma. Quicker recovery, especially useful in active teenagersRisk of rectal cancer. Annual surveillance with proctoscopy & flexible sigmoidoscopy is required
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis< 20 rectal, adenomas; < 1000 colonic, adenomasRemoves nearly all polyps in colon & rectum. No need of permanent ileostomy. Quality of life is satisfactoryIncreased complications. Unpredictable bowel function. Unpredictable quality of life. Possible need for ileostomy. Pouch complications: (1) Risk of pouch polyposis; and (2) Risk of cancer in anal transition zone. Surveillance is difficult
Proctocolectomy & end ileostomyLow rectal cancer. When Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is not indicated. Poor anal sphincter. FunctionComplete removal of cancer risk in lower gastrointestinal tractPermanent ileostomy. Sexual and fertility consequences such as dyspareunia, decrease in fertility, vaginal discharge in females and reduced libido, sexual satisfaction in males