Published online Sep 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i9.1005
Peer-review started: June 4, 2020
First decision: June 15, 2020
Revised: July 5, 2020
Accepted: August 1, 2020
Article in press: August 1, 2020
Published online: September 15, 2020
Processing time: 97 Days and 22.2 Hours
Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is widely used for malignant colorectal obstruction. Recently, SEMS has been used for palliative option for colorectal obstruction caused by extracolonic malignancy (ECM).
There is a debate about the role of endoscopic stent insertion and few studies have reported the results of stent insertion for colorectal obstruction by ECM.
In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SEMS for colorectal obstruction caused by ECM, and to identify the factors associated with stent occlusion.
Seventy-two patients who were treated with uncovered SEMS for malignant colorectal obstructions caused by colorectal metastasis or peritoneal seeding of ECM at Samsung Medical Center between April 2012 to March 2016 were enrolled. Technical and clinical outcomes of stent insertion, the factors associated with stent occlusion and long-term outcomes after stent insertion were analyzed.
Technical success rate was determined as 90.3% with a clinical success rate of 87.7%. Stent occlusion developed in 28.1%, with a median duration of 51 d. Further, 81.3% patients with stent occlusion could be treated with secondary stent insertion. Clinical failure was observed to be related to the male sex and right colon obstruction. Stent length ≤ 10 cm was found to be associated with stent occlusion (P = 0.003). Median survival time after stent insertion was 4.7 mo and 40.4% were able to receive their oncological treatments after stent insertion without surgery.
Uncovered SEMS is effective for the treatment of colorectal obstruction caused by ECM.
Palliative treatment using uncovered SEMS insertion for colorectal obstruction caused by ECM was found to be as effective and safe treatment. The associated clinical outcome and stent patency duration might be adequate for palliative purposes, considering the shorter life expectancy of such patients and resulting improved quality of life.