Lee et al[9] | Evaluate cotransplantation of HSCs and T-MSCs and influence of MMP3 expression | Chimerism | FC | 10 | Only the HSC + T-MSC group had a significant increase in frequency of H-2d cells in PB receptor | Cotransplantation of T-MSCs with intact expression of MMP3 increased homing and engraftment of HSCs, as well as blood cell recovery and survival |
The HSC + MMP3kdT-MSC group did not present any alteration |
Hematopoietic reconstitution | BC | 24 | The HSC + T-MSC group had the highest number of circulating WBCs and RBCs and similar level to the control group |
Homing | FC | 1 | The groups that received T-MSCs presented higher homing independently of expression of MMP3 |
Cellularity | H&E | 24 | The cellularity of the BM only was significantly increased in the HSC + T-MSC group |
Survival | Kaplan-Meier estimator | 24 | The HSC + T-MSC group had a higher survival rate (71%) in comparison to the HSC + MMP3kdT-MSC group (38%) |
Huang et al[10] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and UCB-MSCs in an iron overload model | Chimerism | FC | 42 | Cotransplantation of HSCs with UCB-MSCs increased the frequency of CD45+ cells in BM, independently of route, and presented a higher frequency of CD34+ only with IB route | Cotransplantation of HSCs with UCB-MSCs increased the engraftment and the proliferation of UCB-MNCs, improving their differentiation in the iron overload model independently of the administration rote |
Distribution | Fluorescence | 42 | HSCs in the IV group accumulated in the spleen but not BM, and in the IB group, accumulation was mainly in BM |
Expression of hematopoietic cytokines | IHC | 42 | Cotransplantation of HSCs with UCB-MSCs increased expression of VEGF-A, OPN, and SDF-1 independently of route |
Survival | Kaplan-Meier estimator | 42 | The HSC + UCB-MSC group via IB had a higher survival rate |
Yin et al[8] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSC and MSC expressing EGF, FGF2 or PDGFB | Chimerism | FC | 84 | There was no difference in the frequency of CD34+ and CD45+ between the HSC + MSC and HSC groups | BM treated with PDGFB-MSCs improved the self-renewal of human HSCs in primary recipients, leading to superior engraftment in secondary transplantation |
PDGFB-MSC significantly increased the frequency of CD45+ and CD34+ human cells in comparison with HSC group, except CD34+ IV |
The FGF2-MSC group had a significant increase in CD45+ by IB route compared with the HSC group |
PDGFB-MSC promoted a higher frequency of CD45+ in secondary transplantations |
Choi et al[11] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and T-MSCs in thymus regeneration | Survival | Kaplan–Meier estimator | 40 | The HSC + T-MSC group had a higher survival rate | Cotransplantation of HSCs and T-MSCs improved survival rate and restored the thymus structure and increased the diversity of thymus-derived T cells |
Thymus regeneration | Tissue volumetry | 3, 10 and 40 | In 10 d, the thymuses of the HSC + T-MSC group were larger |
In 40 d, the thymuses of all groups returned to a size similar to the control thymus |
Histology | | Highest cellularity and better-defined structures in the HSC + T-MSC group |
IHC | | The HSC + T-MSC group presented more CD3+ cells |
Trento et al[12] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSC and Nos2−/− MSC in the differentiation of myeloid cells | Chimerism | FC | 13 | There was no difference in the frequency of CD45.1+ myeloid cells in the BM and in the spleen of the recipient animals | There was no difference in the frequency of neutrophils and eosinophil between the groups, macrophages and monocytes were more numerous in the HSC + MSC group |
Hematopoietic reconstitution | FC | 13 | There was an increase of the frequency of macrophages and monocytes in the HSC + MSC group compared to the HSC and HSC + Nos2−/− MSC group |
Abbuehl et al[13] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and MSCs | Chimerism | FC | 112 | Cotransplantation of HSCs and MSCs increased the frequency and number of GFP+ LSK, HSCs (LSK CD48 CD150+) and LT- HSCs (LSK CD48- CD150+ CD34) cells in secondary receptors of HSCs derived from the HSC + MSC group | Cotransplantation of HSCs with MSCs significantly increased number of functional HSCs derived from donors |
Hematopoietic reconstitution | BC | 7 and 14 | Highest number of lymphocytes and neutrophils in 14 d in the HSC + MSC group |
Kim et al[14] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and stimulated MSCs | Chimerism | FC | 64 to 84 | Percentage of CD45.1+ and number of LSK CD45.1 cells increased in the HSC + MSC-SS group | Cotransplantation of HSCs with MSCs under stimulatory condition increased HSC engraftment |
Percentage of CD45.1+ lymphoid cells was equal in the HSC and HSC + MSC-NSS groups, however there was a reduction in the HSC + MSC-SS group IB route, the reverse was observed in myeloid cells |
Hematopoietic reconstitution | IHC | 64 to 84 | Only observed in the HSC + MSC-SS group |
Futrega et al[15] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and MSC-spheroids | Chimerism | FC | 56 (weekly) | Reduction of CD45+ in the HSC + MSC group in spleen comparing IB to IV route | HSC transplantation by IB route improved IB engraftment, but did not contribute to high levels of systemic engraftment in xenogeneic animal models and cotransplantation with MSC-spheroids enhanced supportive environment to retention of HSC in IB route |
Significant reduction of CD34+ in the MSC-spheroids group in PB and spleen in IB route |
Increase in engraftment of CD45+ and CD34+ in IB administration of the HSCs with MSCs or without MSCs in comparison to distal bone |
van der Garde et al[16] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs expanded with TPO and MSCs | Chimerism | FC | 42 | The HSC + MSC group had significantly increased CD45+ in the receptors while TPO only induced engraftment | Cotransplantation of MSCs can improve engraftment after 6 wk, whereas TPO expansion improves early platelet recovery |
Platelet recovery | FC | 14 and 42 | In short term, use of Ex/TPO-HSCs with or without MSCs increased platelet number, in long term, only the presence of MSCs with HSCs had an effect on platelet formation |
Fernández-García et al[17] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and AT-MSCs | Chimerism | FC | 28, 56, and 84 | Cotransplantation of HSCs and MSCs resulted in an increase of CD45.1+ in the receptor dose-dependently in the mild conditioning (5 Gy) | Cotransplantation with low doses of AT-MSCs accelerated early HSC engraft, but only higher dose of MSCs improved later HSC engraftment, as also long-term repopulating HSCs, and homing of HSCs, facilitating hematopoietic reconstitution |
Highest frequency of CD45.1+ in secondary and tertiary receptors, using HSCs + higher doses of AT-MSCs |
Homing | FC | 2, 4, and 24 h | Co-infusion of AT-MSCs increased homing of LSK CD45.1+ cells in BM |
Chen et al[18] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and MSCs overexpressing CXCR4 | Chimerism | FC | 7 and 14 | At 7 d, frequency of H-2b cells in the receptors was lower in the HSC + CXCR4-MSC group, increasing equally in all groups at 14 d | Cotransplantation of HSCs with CXCR4-MSCs accelerates hematopoietic reconstitution, promotes HSC engraftment, PB cell recovery, and BM hyperplasia |
Hematopoietic reconstitution | BC | 7 to 21 | The HSC + MSC group increased reconstitution of leukocytes and platelets, and HSC + CXCR4-MSC group had more rapid effect |
Cellularity | HE | 7 and 14 | Highest cellularity in the BM and in the spleen of the receptors of CXCR4-MSC, predominantly myeloid in BM |
Chen et al[19] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and MSCs modified to express SDF-1/HOXB4 | Chimerism | FC | 28 | The presence of CD45+ was higher in the groups that received MSCs, with emphasis in HSC + SDF1-HOXB4-MSC group | HSC + SDF1-HOXB4-MSC group significantly increased engraftment of HSCs, hematopoietic recovery, and rapid recovery of BM cellularity |
Hematopoietic reconstitution | BC | 7, 14, 21, and 28 | In the HSC + SDF1-HOXB4-MSC group, the WBCs, PLT and HGB levels returned to normal |
The HSC + SDF-1-MSC group did not present total recovery, although the WBC, PLT and HGB levels recovered more quickly than in other groups |
Cellularity | Wright staining | 14 and 28 | The cellularity was significantly higher in the HSC + SDF-1-MSC and HSC + HOXB4-MSC groups |
Survival | Kaplan–Meier estimator | 14 and 28 | The HSC + SDF1-HOXB4-MSC group had higher survival rate than other groups |
Wu et al[20] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and MSCs | Chimerism | FC | 56 to 77 | The HSC + UCB-MSC group had higher frequency of CD45+ in the PB and BM | The use of UCB-MSCs in cotransplantation resulted in better engraftment of HSCs |
Lim et al[21] | Evaluate cotransplantation of HSCs treated with hPTH and MSCs | Hematopoietic reconstitution | BC | 28, 42 and 49 | There was no difference in the number of WBCs, RBCs and PLTs in the groups over time | Cotransplantation of HSCs with MSCs could lead to an increase of hematopoietic reconstitution and may be a synergistic effect between MSCs and hPTH |
Cellularity | FC | 49 | There was difference only in the HSC and HSC + UCB-MSC groups treated with hPTH |
CD34+ did not differ between the groups, but myeloid and lymphoid lineages were markedly higher in HSC + UCB-MSC + hPTH group |
HE | 56 | Highest cellularity of the BM in the groups that received hPTH with or without MSCs |
Lee et al[22] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and AT-MSCs, UCB-MSCs or BM-MSCs | Chimerism | FC | 42 or 70 | The groups that received MSCs, independently of the source, had an increase of the frequency of CD45+ cells | Cotransplantation of HSCs with BM-MSCs, AT-MSCs or UCB-MSCs increased engraftment, and UCB-MSCs had higher proliferation rates |
Kornblit et al[23] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and MSCs with identical DLA or not | Hematopoietic reconstitution | BC | 100 | There was no difference in the number of PLTs and granulocytes between the groups | Cotransplantation of HSCs with MSCs did not increase engraftment of HSCs, and the MSCs with identical DLA or not was safe |
Fortin et al[24] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and MSCs expressing solG-CSFR | Chimerism | FC | 13 and 45 | In the HSC + MSC group, there was a higher number of CD45+ compared to other groups | In the cotransplantation of HSCs with MSCs, the presence of solG-CSFR increased the homing and accelerated hematopoietic reconstitution |
Homing | FC | 18 h | The homing was significantly higher in the HSC + solG-CSFR-MSC group than the HSC + MSC group, and in this last group the increase did not differ from the control group |
Carrancio et al[25] | Evaluate the cotransplantation of HSCs and MSCs according to the routes (IB and IV) | Chimerism | FC | 21 and 42 | The number of CD45+ was significantly higher in the HSC + MSC s by IV route (at 21 d), but at 42 d, this increase occurred in the HSC + MSC group by IB route in the local area of administration, followed by the HSC + MSC group by IV | MSCs increased hematopoietic engraftment when cotransplanted by both routes (IV/IB) |