Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2021; 9(30): 8974-8984
Published online Oct 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i30.8974
Table 1 Strengths and weakness of multimodality imaging techniques in evaluating tricuspid valve infective endocarditis
Imaging modality
Strengths
Weaknesses
Transthoracic echocardiographyGood assessment of vegetation and valvular function; Reproducible and low cost; Evaluation of the hemodynamic consequencesLimited sensitivity for vegetations attached to pacemaker leads and paravalvular complications; Limited ability to evaluate PVE
Transesophageal echocardiographyBetter evaluation in PVE and CIED; Tricuspid valve function and PHT assessment; Detection of potential residual material after device extractionPotential procedural complications for TEE; Limited differentiation between lead vegetation vs thrombus; Limited detection of peripheral complications
Multislice computed tomographyCan detect abscess/pseudoaneurysms; PVE extension and fistulas; Coronary artery preoperative assessment; Identifying pulmonary diseases as abscesses; Evidence of extracardiac involvementRadiation exposure; Lead artifacts; Limited assessment in small vegetations contrast-induced nephrotoxicity
Magnetic resonanceDetection of extra-cardiac embolic lesions and systemic emboliClaustrophobia; Cannot be performed for certain CIED
18F-FDG PET/CTHigh sensitivity in PVE, generator/pocket and extracardiac or extravascular lead infection; Hypermetabolism + anatomic lesions (vegetations, leaflet thickening and perforation, fistulas); Better definition of the locoregional extension of the infectionRadiation exposure; Patient preparation (myocardial suppression); Visual interpretation. Non-standardized quantification analysis; False positive studies from inflammation or FDG uptake of the prosthetic materials
WBC-SPECT/CTHigh specificity for pocket/generator or extravascular lead infectionRadiation exposure; Longer acquisition time; Lower spatial resolution