Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2021; 9(26): 7944-7953
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7944
Table 1 General clinical data of eight neonates with persistent left superior vena cava
Male: female (patients)Gestational age (W)
Birth weight (g)
Age at PICC placement
Number of PICC procedures
< 28
28-31+6
32-36+6
> 37
< 1 000
1000-1499
1500-2499
≥ 2500
≤ 24 h
> 24 h
For the first time
For the second time
5:5133123215371
Table 2 Information on eight neonates with persistent left superior vena cava who received a peripherally inserted central catheter
Serial number
Date of admission
Gestational age (W)
Birth weight (g)
Primary diagnosis
Age at PICC placement
Number of PICC procedures
Weight (g)
Puncture site
Placement length (cm)
First tip positioning
Adjustment situation
Reposition
Days of PICC indwelling (d)
Patient 1May 22, 2017321310Preterm, very low birth weight20 h11310Left basilic vein13.5T9Pull out 2.7 cmT5-68
Patient 2July 13, 201740+22650Postoperative esophageal atresia10 d12970Left axillary vein10T7-8Pull out 0.5 cmT615
Patient 3March 18, 201829+31200Preterm, very low birth weight, patent ductus arteriosus1 d11200Left basilic vein12.5T8Pull out 0.8 cmT5-618
Patient 4November 9, 201834+1975Preterm, very low birth weight, atrial septal defect1 d1975Left basilic vein12T5-639
Patient 5December 3, 201827+2880Preterm, very low birth weight, patent ductus arteriosus, tricuspid regurgitation (moderate)32 d21425Left median vein11T610
Patient 6December 26, 201836+42250Postoperative esophageal atresia, preterm, low birth weight3 d12640Left superficial temporal vein12.5T66
Patient 7February 3, 201930+61220Preterm, very low birth weight1 d11220Left basilic vein12.5T9Pull out 2.5 cmT56
Patient 8February 3, 201930+21500Preterm, low birth weight5 h11503Left axillary vein8T8The lumen of the left superior vena cava was obviously smaller than that of the right superior vena cava, so the PICC was removed on the same day. The patient was scheduled for catherization through a lower extremity vein, but the family abandoned treatment 12 h after admission
Table 3 Comparison of the traditional approach with the TIMB method

Traditional approach
TIMB methods
Timing of PICC placementOn the day of birthAt least 24 h after birth, except for under special circumstances, such as rescue
Review of imaging data before catheterizationN/ARetrospective analysis of imaging data should be performed before catheterization
Selection of the puncture siteThe first choice is the basilic vein of the upper limbs, both left and rightThe first choice is a lower limb vein; left upper limb and left scalp veins should be avoided in patients with PLSVC
Body surface measurement methodFrom the prepuncture point along the vein to the right sternoclavicular joint and down to the 1/2 intercostal spaceIn patients who were diagnosed with PLSVC by B-ultrasound before PICC placement, when a left-side puncture was required due to vascular conditions, the body surface length was measured from the left puncture point along the vein to the left sternoclavicular joint plus 0.5 cm. If we chose to insert the PICC from a lower limb or right limb, the body surface length was measured in the same manner as in the traditional approach
Whether under B-ultrasound guidanceNoYes
Summary and challengesUsing this traditional approach will reduce the first-attempt success rate of PICC placement and limit the ability to discover cardiovascular abnormalities in a timely manner. The use of one measurement method could lead to the PICC tip position being too deep or too shallow. In addition, not using B-ultrasound guidance could also cause the PICC tip position to be too deep or too shallowUsing this new approach can improve the first-attempt success rate of PICC placement, reveal cardiovascular abnormalities in advance, allow the selection of different measurement methods reasonably according to the puncture site, and finally, improve the accuracy of catheter positioning through the use of B-ultrasound guidance. The new method, summarized after application in 8 neonates, still has certain limitations, and a large sample is needed for further research