Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2021; 9(26): 7750-7761
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7750
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7750
Table 1 Patients’ consultation wait time before and after precision valuation reservation registration
Time | Number of appointments | Consultation wait time (min) |
2017-01 | 7025 | 19.43 |
2017-02 | 9361 | 16.65 |
2017-03 | 10713 | 18.18 |
2017-04 | 10095 | 16.55 |
2017-05 | 11248 | 17.01 |
2017-06 | 10393 | 17.59 |
2017-07 | 10471 | 19.40 |
2017-08 | 12385 | 18.23 |
2017-09 | 10289 | 16.84 |
2017-10 | 10386 | 17.57 |
2017-11 | 10405 | 17.96 |
2017-12 | 11385 | 20.61 |
2018-01 | 12695 | 21.71 |
2018-02 | 10108 | 18.72 |
2018-03 | 14299 | 18.87 |
2018-04 | 12538 | 18.88 |
2018-05 | 14062 | 18.86 |
2018-06 | 13194 | 18.99 |
2018-07 | 13436 | 18.89 |
2018-08 | 14600 | 14.31 |
2018-09 | 11078 | 14.12 |
2018-10 | 13634 | 15.69 |
2018-11 | 13110 | 16.74 |
2018-12 | 13508 | 15.07 |
2019-01 | 14213 | 13.03 |
2019-02 | 11075 | 10.16 |
2019-03 | 15211 | 7.27 |
2019-04 | 14502 | 6.47 |
2019-05 | 15226 | 5.82 |
2019-06 | 13783 | 5.69 |
2019-07 | 15864 | 4.84 |
2019-08 | 15485 | 5.76 |
2019-09 | 14240 | 6.50 |
2019-10 | 14946 | 9.12 |
2019-11 | 14338 | 9.32 |
2019-12 | 15285 | 9.90 |
2020-01 | 11144 | 9.56 |
2020-02 | 2815 | 12.75 |
Table 2 Comparison of the mean wait time before and after precision valuation reservation registration
Time | Total appointments | Average wait time (min) | t value | P value |
2017-01 to 2018-07 | 214488 | 18.47 | 8.90 | < 0.001 |
2018-08 to 2020-02 | 254057 | 10.11 |
Table 3 Patient satisfaction before and after precision valuation reservation registration
Time | Very satisfied1 | Satisfied1 | General1 | Dissatisfied1 | Very dissatisfied1 | Satisfaction score |
2017-01 | 130 | 127 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 90.18 |
2017-02 | 178 | 72 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 92.59 |
2017-03 | 160 | 140 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 90.91 |
2017-04 | 137 | 114 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 92.96 |
2017-05 | 187 | 83 | 26 | 4 | 0 | 90.00 |
2017-06 | 155 | 146 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 91.21 |
2017-07 | 151 | 160 | 29 | 2 | 3 | 89.21 |
2017-08 | 270 | 56 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 94.49 |
2017-09 | 205 | 90 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 93.65 |
2017-10 | 178 | 62 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 94.12 |
2017-11 | 157 | 144 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 91.21 |
2017-12 | 112 | 167 | 28 | 5 | 3 | 88.57 |
2018-01 | 127 | 162 | 36 | 3 | 2 | 87.58 |
2018-02 | 133 | 74 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 92.00 |
2018-03 | 162 | 122 | 26 | 5 | 0 | 90.16 |
2018-04 | 149 | 107 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 89.82 |
2018-05 | 159 | 143 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 91.52 |
2018-06 | 176 | 103 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 93.00 |
2018-07 | 172 | 132 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 92.12 |
2018-08 | 223 | 101 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 93.91 |
2018-09 | 200 | 70 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 94.74 |
2018-10 | 295 | 62 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 95.19 |
2018-11 | 207 | 102 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 93.64 |
2018-12 | 244 | 58 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 95.87 |
2019-01 | 241 | 75 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 95.76 |
2019-02 | 184 | 34 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 96.89 |
2019-03 | 262 | 31 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 97.67 |
2019-04 | 282 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 98.10 |
2019-05 | 281 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 98.67 |
2019-06 | 250 | 29 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 97.89 |
2019-07 | 289 | 48 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 97.68 |
2019-08 | 242 | 80 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 97.58 |
2019-09 | 231 | 60 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 97.00 |
2019-10 | 178 | 77 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 94.44 |
2019-11 | 230 | 72 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 95.87 |
2019-12 | 257 | 62 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 96.67 |
2020-01 | 201 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 97.92 |
2020-02 | 206 | 74 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 93.67 |
Table 4 Comparison of the mean satisfaction score before and after precision valuation reservation registration
Time | Copies | Mean satisfaction score | t value | P value |
2017-01 to 2018-07 | 5775 | 91.31 | -8.62 | < 0.001 |
2018-08 to 2020-02 | 5730 | 96.26 |
Table 5 Satisfaction of medical staff before and after precision valuation reservation registration
Time | Very satisfied1 | Satisfied1 | General1 | Dissatisfied1 | Very dissatisfied1 | Satisfaction score |
2017-01 | 60 | 55 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 88.46 |
2017-02 | 74 | 43 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 91.41 |
2017-03 | 68 | 49 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 90.00 |
2017-04 | 77 | 42 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 92.25 |
2017-05 | 64 | 53 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 90.70 |
2017-06 | 69 | 49 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 91.47 |
2017-07 | 71 | 43 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 89.76 |
2017-08 | 69 | 45 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 90.48 |
2017-09 | 77 | 39 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 91.34 |
2017-10 | 68 | 47 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 90.55 |
2017-11 | 71 | 45 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 91.34 |
2017-12 | 55 | 58 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 88.28 |
2018-01 | 53 | 59 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 87.50 |
2018-02 | 67 | 47 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 90.48 |
2018-03 | 76 | 42 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 91.47 |
2018-04 | 79 | 40 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 92.25 |
2018-05 | 73 | 44 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 90.70 |
2018-06 | 63 | 53 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 90.63 |
2018-07 | 64 | 52 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 90.63 |
2018-08 | 84 | 35 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 92.97 |
2018-09 | 87 | 32 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 93.70 |
2018-10 | 87 | 32 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 93.70 |
2018-11 | 77 | 40 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 92.13 |
2018-12 | 102 | 27 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 94.85 |
2019-01 | 108 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 95.59 |
2019-02 | 119 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 97.04 |
2019-03 | 125 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 98.53 |
2019-04 | 120 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 97.81 |
2019-05 | 125 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 97.81 |
2019-06 | 124 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 97.83 |
2019-07 | 128 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 98.55 |
2019-08 | 124 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 97.81 |
2019-09 | 118 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 97.06 |
2019-10 | 110 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 95.59 |
2019-11 | 113 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 96.35 |
2019-12 | 115 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 95.86 |
2020-01 | 122 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 96.53 |
2020-02 | 112 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 95.14 |
Table 6 Comparison of the mean satisfaction score of medical staff before and after precision valuation reservation registration
Time | Number of medical staff | Mean satisfaction score | t value | P value |
2017-01 to 2018-07 | 2434 | 90.51 | -10.50 | < 0.001 |
2018-08 to 2020-02 | 2581 | 96.04 |
- Citation: Jin HJ, Cheng AL, Qian JY, Lin LM, Tang HM. Effect and satisfaction of outpatient services by precision valuation reservation registration. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(26): 7750-7761
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i26/7750.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7750