Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2021; 9(21): 5840-5849
Published online Jul 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i21.5840
Table 1 Comparison of expectoration effect between two groups of patients, n (%)
Group
n
Obviously effective
Effective
Ineffective
Refined care6138 (62.3)19 (31.15)4 (6.56)
Control5926 (44.07)25 (42.37)8 (13.56)
Z-2.080
P value0.038
Table 2 Comparison of sputum suction with negative pressure between the two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Yes
No
Refined care6114 (22.95)47 (77.05)
Control5926 (44.07)33 (55.93)
χ26.018
P value0.014
Table 3 Arterial blood gas monitoring of two groups of patients (mean ± SD)
GroupnPaO2 (mmHg)
PaCO2 (mmHg)
Before intervention
After intervention
Before intervention
After intervention
Refined care6158.6 ± 5.085.2 ± 6.1158.2 ± 6.142.9 ± 4.71
Control5958.3 ± 5.783.4 ± 6.8157.8 ± 5.044.7 ± 6.01
t0.3071.5270.392-1.833
P value0.7600.1290.6960.069
Table 4 Comparison of medical research council scores between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group
n
MRC
t
P value
Before intervention
After intervention
Refined care613.44 ± 0.521.82 ± 0.5017.3870.000
Control593.58 ± 0.602.10 ± 0.5514.0720.000
t-1.367-2.920
P value0.1740.004
Table 5 Comparison of quality of life scores between the two groups (mean ± SD)
GroupnSymptom part
Active part
Before intervention
After intervention
Before intervention
After intervention
1Refined care6151.4 ± 8.576.8 ± 9.0144.2 ± 7.471.9 ± 5.51
Control5949.2 ± 6.271.0 ± 7.4145.8 ± 6.667.7 ± 7.81
t1.6153.849-1.2493.418
P value0.1090.0000.2140.001
2Disease impactSGRQ score
Before intervention After interventionBefore interventionAfter intervention
Refined care6147.2 ± 6.178.5 ± 8.5147.6 ± 6.275.7 ± 7.51
Control5949.4 ± 6.675.8 ± 7.6148.1 ± 6.871.5 ± 5.81
t-1.8971.832-0.4213.424
P value0.0600.0690.6740.001