Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2021; 9(18): 4573-4584
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4573
Table 1 Some major fields in the prenatal down syndrome screening and postnatal follow-up database
S/N
Date of receipt
Pregnant mother number
Sample number
Date of birthBlood sampling dateExpected age at deliveryT21 age riskvalue
T18 age riskAFP MoM1hCGb MoMuE3 MoM
AFP concentration2hCGb concentrationuE3 concentrationGestational age
Body weightExamination unitDate of last menstruationEthnicity/race
Menstrual cycleHistory of abnormal pregnancySmoking statusCRL3
BPD4NT5Fetal chromosomal karyotypePregnancy outcomes
Table 2 Some data samples used for feature selection
ID
Expected age at delivery
AFP concentration
hCGb concentration
uE3 concentration
Body weight
Gestational age
Result
78319.63323.2230.715.3560.717.61
150439.40344.130.413.876216.41
433830.52723.7326.295.866518.51
605034.48911.5352.429.852.520.61
641241.96624.5149.673.9158191
Table 3 Experimental results
Algorithm
DR
FPR
Time
CART+AdaBoost0.29410.28570:09:54
SVM+SMOTE-Tomek10.01830:09:01
CART+AdaBoost+SMOTE-Tomek,maxdepth=2,iter=1000.97770.23370:02:14
CART+AdaBoost+SMOTE-Tomek,maxdepth=2,iter=5000.99090.138207:18.0
CART+AdaBoost+SMOTE-Tomek,maxdepth=5,iter=1000.99870.01020:03:15
CART+AdaBoost+SMOTE-Tomek,maxdepth=5,iter=5000.99930.00280:11:37
SVM+EasyEnsemble10.99730.00348
SVM+ADASYN0.98630.09320:11:05
Table 4 Comparison of algorithms when different T21 threshold values were selected
Risk-cutoff valueAgeSVM
Statistical methods
FPR
DR
FPR
DR
270Overall0.0093690.92950.0320.913
50Overall0.0030810.9130.0070.82
150Overall0.0070390.92680.0190.885
250Overall0.0081970.91780.030.91
500Overall0.017750.92660.0530.937
750Overall0.022990.93190.0720.95
1000Overall0.033210.93050.0880.958