Clinical and radiological outcomes of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty: A 5-year follow-up

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i16.3869

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 9, Issue 16

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3791)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

280

WORD

119

HTML

2096

Figures (1-3)

262

Tables (1-3)

295

Sum=3052

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

245

Download

494

Sum=739

Jun 6, 2021 (publication date) through Apr 23, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (1)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2021; 9(16): 3869-3879
Published online Jun 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i16.3869

Table 1 Demographic data

Demographic
Gender (male:female)	22:18
Age (years)	45.6 (26-66)
Symptoms
Radiculopathy	18
Myelopathy	12
Both	10
Implanted level
C3/4	4
C4/5	9
C5/6	23
C6/7	10
Blood loss (mL)
Single-level	97 ± 18
Double-level	120 ± 26
Operation time (min)
Single-level	93 ± 15
Double-level	131 ± 27
Hospital day (d)	10
Ambulation after operation	2^th day
Alcohol (%)	15 (37.5)
Smoking (%)	10 (25)

Table 2 Summary of SF-36 subscores preoperatively and at five follow-up intervals

	Preop	1-mo	6-mo	12-mo	24-mo	60-mo
Physical function	54.1 ± 22.0	74.3 ± 21.2^a	77.5 ± 18.4^a	85.0 ± 24.2^a	84.4 ± 20.1^a	83.3 ± 22.1^a
Role-physical	47.5 ± 18.2	60.5 ± 20.3^a	66.3 ± 19.9^a	64.1 ± 21.0^a	64.8 ± 17.4^a	65.2 ± 18.4^a
Bodily pain	38.5 ± 12.6	70.0 ± 19.8^a	72.5 ± 21.3^a	67.5 ± 18.2^a	68.3 ± 16.4^a	67.3 ± 19.7^a
General health	41.1 ± 14.2	66.6 ± 18.4^a	72.5 ± 21.4^a	70.8 ± 15.1^a	69.3 ± 22.5^a	68.3 ± 23.4^a
Vitality	48.1 ± 19.3	68.6 ± 22.9^a	80.0 ± 16.3^a	67.5 ± 23.6^a	72.4 ± 21.4^a	70.4 ± 22.5^a
Social function	58.4 ± 21.0	77.1 ± 26.7^a	75.2 ± 19.8^a	81.3 ± 24.3^a	80.2 ± 20.7^a	81.2 ± 23.7^a
Role-emotional	37.2 ± 12.9	71.4 ± 14.3^a	73.5 ± 24.6^a	83.3 ± 23.1^a	79.3 ± 18.7^a	78.3 ± 15.7^a
Mental health	61.8 ± 18.6	75.1 ± 22.3^a	78.0 ± 19.4^a	82.2 ± 23.6^a	83.5 ± 19.2^a	84.5 ± 20.1^a

^aP < 0.05, compared with preoperative value.

Table 3 Radiographic range of motion (°), alignment (°), and intervertebral height (mm) preoperatively and at five follow-up intervals

	Preop	1-mo	6-mo	12-mo	24-mo	60-mo
C2-C7 ROM	50.2 ± 14.6	44.8 ± 12.6^a	48.2 ± 13.6	48.9 ± 13.8	49.4 ± 14.4	49.2 ± 13.7
FSU ROM	8.7 ± 3.1	6.2 ± 2.8^a	8.0 ± 2.6	8.5 ± 2.7	8.3 ± 2.5	8.0 ± 2.5
Upper adjacent level ROM	9.3 ± 4.0	7.4 ± 3.8^a	9.5 ± 3.4	9.4 ± 3.2	9.1 ± 3.0	9.0 ± 3.1
Lower adjacent level ROM	8.5 ± 3.2	7.1 ± 2.5^a	7.9 ± 2.6	8.1 ± 2.7	8.4 ± 2.9	8.8 ± 2.7
C2-C7 left lateral bending	27.9 ± 9.6	21.4 ± 5.9^a	27.3 ± 7.8	25.6 ± 8.1	26.7 ± 7.8	26.3 ± 8.1
C2-C7 right lateral bending	30.3 ± 10.2	22.6 ± 6.5^a	28.8 ± 7.6	27.3 ± 8.5	27.5 ± 7.9	26.8 ± 7.7
FSU left lateral bending	3.5 ± 1.6	1.5 ± 0.4^a	1.4 ± 0.4^a	1.2 ± 0.3^a	1.2 ± 0.5^a	1.1 ± 0.3^a
FSU right lateral bending	3.4 ± 1.6	1.6 ± 0.5^a	1.6 ± 0.6^a	1.3 ± 0.4^a	1.2 ± 0.3^a	1.0 ± 0.2^a
C2-C7 alignment	10.3 ± 9.0	13.5 ± 7.6^a	14.5 ± 8.9^a	16.3 ± 9.4^a	15.9 ± 7.8^a	16.5 ± 7.9^a
FSU angle	2.2 ± 1.6	3.4 ± 1.2^a	4.5 ± 1.9^a	5.4 ± 1.7^a	5.3 ± 1.6^a	5.5 ± 1.5^a
Intervertebral height	4.2 ± 1.2	6.0 ± 1.3^a	5.8 ± 1.6^a	5.7 ± 1.4^a	5.5 ± 1.3^a	5.2 ± 1.1^a

^aP < 0.05, compared with preoperative value. ROM: Range of motion; FSU: Functional spinal unit; FSU angle: The alignment of the operated segment.

Citation: Zou L, Rong X, Liu XJ, Liu H. Clinical and radiological outcomes of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty: A 5-year follow-up. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(16): 3869-3879
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i16/3869.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i16.3869