Fu XJ, Hu SD, Peng YF, Zhou LY, Shu T, Song DD. Observation of the effect of one-to-one education on high-risk cases of diabetic foot. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(14): 3265-3272 [PMID: 34002135 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i14.3265]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Xia-Jun Fu, BSc, Chief Nurse, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 183 West Zhongshan Avenue, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China. fuxiajun@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2021; 9(14): 3265-3272 Published online May 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i14.3265
Table 1 Comparison of the basic information of the two groups
Basic information
Basic nursing group, n = 49
One-to-one education group, n = 49
x2/t
P value
Sex
Male
26 (53.06)
27 (55.10)
0.084
0.772
Female
23 (46.94)
22 (44.90)
Household registration
Urban
29 (59.18)
30 (61.22)
0.087
0.768
Rural
20 (40.82)
19 (38.78)
Cultural background
Junior high school
4 (8.16)
3 (6.12)
0.314
0.575
High school
21 (42.86)
20 (40.82)
0.086
0.770
College or above
24 (48.98)
26 (53.06)
0.333
0.564
Course of disease in yr
5.63 ± 0.87
5.71 ± 0.89
0.450
0.654
Age in yr
58.69 ± 4.21
58.91 ± 4.29
0.256
0.798
Table 2 Comparison of self-care capacity scale scores of the one-to-one education group with the basic nursing group
ESCA scores
One-to-one education group, n = 49
Basic nursing group, n = 49
t
P value
Self-care skills
35.98 ± 3.65
26.87 ± 3.16
13.209
0.001
Self-concept
26.19 ± 2.57
20.13 ± 3.02
10.697
0.001
Self-care responsibility
27.94 ± 3.11
21.06 ± 2.09
12.853
0.001
Self-care knowledge
44.89 ± 4.01
35.16 ± 3.16
13.341
0.001
Table 3 Comparison of compliance behavior score between the two groups
Compliance behavior score
One-to-one education group, n = 49
Basic nursing group, n = 49
t
P value
Foot bathing
8.63 ± 1.01
6.87 ± 0.81
9.516
0.001
Exercise health care
8.51 ± 0.97
6.94 ± 0.83
8.609
0.001
Shoes and socks selection
9.04 ± 1.24
8.05 ± 1.01
4.333
0.001
Table 4 Comparison of patient mastery between the two groups
Patient mastery
One-to-one education group, n = 49
Basic nursing group, n = 49
x2
P value
Master
31 (63.27)
22 (44.90)
6.795
0.009
Basically master
17 (34.69)
15 (30.61)
0.379
0.538
Never master
1 (2.04)
12 (24.49)
21.903
0.001
Knowledge mastery rate
48 (97.96)
37 (75.51)
21.903
0.001
Table 5 Comparison of nursing satisfaction degree between the two groups
The degree of nursing satisfaction
One-to-one education group (n = 49)
Basic nursing group (n = 49)
x2
P value
Very satisfactory
33 (67.35)
24 (48.98)
6.934
0.008
Basically satisfactory
16 (32.65)
14 (28.57)
0.382
0.531
Unsatisfactory
0 (0.00)
11 (22.45)
25.289
0.001
Nursing satisfaction degree
49 (100.00)
38 (77.55)
25.289
0.001
Citation: Fu XJ, Hu SD, Peng YF, Zhou LY, Shu T, Song DD. Observation of the effect of one-to-one education on high-risk cases of diabetic foot. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(14): 3265-3272