Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2021; 9(14): 3227-3237
Published online May 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i14.3227
Table 1 Reported studies of physical therapies for managing ischemic flaps
Physical method
Year
Research species
Main findings
Ref.
Hyperbaric oxygen1989RatsHBO treatment increased the percentage of surviving axial pattern skin flap when administered during or immediately after total flap ischemia. The improved flap survival appeared to be a systemic and not a local effectZamboni et al[7]
1992RatsHBO treatment of ischemic rat skin flaps improved distal microvascular perfusion as measured by laser Doppler flowmetry. This effect was observed for HBO treatment given either during or immediately after prolonged global ischemiaZamboni et al[8]
1993RatsHBO treatment did not exacerbate reperfusion injury but rather appeared to protect the microcirculation by reducing venular leukocyte adherence and inhibiting progressive adjacent arteriolar vasoconstrictionZamboni et al[16]
2002RatsHBO treatment increased the survival length and mean LD flows of axial pattern skin flaps with all types of vascular insufficiencyUlkür et al[9]
Electrical nerve stimulation1988RatsHigh-intensity (20 mA), high-frequency (80 Hz) TENS applied segmentally at the base of the flap was shown to be the most effective treatment for increasing the flap survivalKjartansson et al[31]
1988HumanENS increased peripheral blood flow and prevented necrosis in ischemic flapsLundeberg et al[34]
1990HumanLocal blood flow in skin flaps was significantly increased by ENS, but not by placebo. Repeated ENS treatment reduced stasis and edema significantly, and the capillary refill was also significantly improvedKjartansson et al[35]
1997RatsThe flap survival area did not increase with EA but increased significantly with TENS treatment, and blood flow in the periphery was significantly greater than that at the baseNiina et al[32]
2003RatsTENS was significantly more effective at increasing the survival of random-pattern skin flaps than topical nitroglycerin or nothingAtalay et al[30]
2006RatsTENS with an amplitude of 15 mA (80 Hz) produced a lower necrotic area than observed in the control group and was efficient at increasing random skin flap viabilityLiebano et al[33]
2008RatsLow-frequency (2 Hz, 15 mA) TENS treatment was effective at improving the viability of ischemic skin flapsLiebano et al[57]
2015RatsElectrical stimulation applied to the normal area before flap elevation increased flap survivalDoğan et al[4]
Heat stress preconditioning2004PigsLocal heat preconditioning may be helpful for reducing wound healing complications related to ischemia following surgical dissection. The effect may be mediated by the induction of HSP70 expressionHarder et al[39]
2005MiceLocal heat preconditioning of myocutaneous tissue markedly increased flap survival by maintaining adequate nutritive perfusion rather than inducing ischemic tolerance. The protection was caused by increased arteriolar blood flow due to significant arteriolar dilation, which was mediated through the carbon monoxide-associated vasoactive properties of HSP32Harder et al[45]
Phototherapy2018RatsPhotobiomodulation therapy with an 810-nm near infrared laser enhanced ischemic flap revascularization and increased flap viabilityMa et al[47]
2019RatsLaser photobiomodulation at three points of the flap cranial base was more effective than at that 12 points for reducing the necrotic areaMartignago et al[48]
Shock wave therapy2009RatsPreoperative ESWT may enhance skin flap survival in a rodent modelReichenberger et al[55]
2011RatsPreoperative ESWT improved skin flap survival through enhanced topical blood perfusion and neovascularization via elevation of angio-active factorsKeil et al[54]
Cold therapy2005MiceExperimental cooling-induced preconditioning attenuates skin flap failure; this was associated with the increased expression of HO-1Kubulus et al[56]