Wang F, Gao SG, Xue Q, Tan FW, Gao YS, Mao YS, Wang DL, Zhao J, Li Y, Yu XY, Cheng H, Zhao CG, Mu JW. Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(1): 24-35 [PMID: 33511169 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.24]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ju-Wei Mu, MD, Doctor, Professor, Surgeon, Surgical Oncologist, Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China. mujuwei@cicams.ac.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, Research & Experimental
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2021; 9(1): 24-35 Published online Jan 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.24
Table 1 Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients and results of univariate analysis for overall survival
Variable
No. of patients (%)
HR
95%CI
P value
Sex
0.488
Female
28 (10.8)
Reference
Male
231 (89.2)
1.199
0.717-2.006
0.488
Age, yr
0.776
≤ 60
88 (34.0)
Reference
61-70
112 (43.2)
0.942
0.671-1.322
0.728
≥ 71
59 (22.8)
1.082
0.729-1.606
0.695
Marital status
0.152
Married
187 (72.2)
Reference
Single
57 (22.0)
1.400
0.996-1.968
0.053
Unknown
15 (5.8)
1.151
0.584-2.266
0.685
Insurance
0.005
Insured
217 (83.8)
Reference
Uninsured
4 (1.5)
5.272
1.904-14.599
0.001
Unknown
38 (14.7)
0.918
0.608-1.358
0.683
Race
0.087
Hispanic (all races)
19 (7.3)
Reference
Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native
2 (0.8)
0.358
0.046-2.762
0.324
Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander
5 (1.9)
1.229
0.395-3.818
0.722
Non-Hispanic Black
10 (3.9)
2.293
0.987-5.326
0.054
Non-Hispanic White
223 (86.1)
0.962
0.534-1.734
0.898
Grade
0.136
I + II
12 (4.6)
Reference
III + IV
214 (82.6)
0.978
0.499-1.918
0.949
Unknown
33 (12.7)
0.595
0.267-1.326
0.204
TNM stage
0.000
I
34 (13.1)
Reference
II
59 (22.8)
1.919
1.031-3.573
0.040
III
130 (50.2)
2.931
1.662-5.168
0.000
IV
36 (13.9)
4.936
2.610-9.334
0.000
T stage
0.048
T1
51 (19.7)
Reference
T2
30 (11.6)
1.757
0.992-3.112
0.053
T3
164 (63.3)
1.705
1.120-2.596
0.013
T4
14 (5.4)
2.334
1.121-4.861
0.024
N stage
0.000
N0
86 (33.2)
Reference
N1
100 (38.6)
1.841
1.263-2.682
0.001
N2
47 (18.1)
2.666
1.697-4.189
0.000
N3
26 (10)
3.836
2.316-6.353
0.000
M stage
0.058
M0
246 (95)
Reference
M1
13 (5.0)
1.809
0.981-3.337
0.058
LODDS
0.000
LODDS1 (4.55 ≤ LODDS ≤ 1.90)
134 (51.7)
Reference
LODDS2 (1.89 ≤ LODDS ≤ 0.15)
99 (38.2)
1.864
1.353-2.569
0.000
LODDS3 (0.16 ≤ LODDS ≤ 4.27)
26 (10)
4.204
2.656-6.655
0.000
Radiation therapy
0.085
No radiation and/or cancer-directed surgery
67 (25.9)
Reference
Radiation prior to surgery
162 (62.5)
1.010
0.710-1.435
0.958
Radiation after surgery
25 (9.7)
1.779
1.061-2.983
0.029
Radiation before and after surgery
5 (1.9)
1.672
0.516-5.421
0.392
Chemotherapy
0.719
No or unknown
49 (18.9)
Reference
Yes
210 (81.1)
1.073
0.730-1.578
0.719
Table 2 Multivariable analysis of overall survival with different classifications of lymph nodes
Variable
Model 1 (N stage)
Model 2 (LODDS)
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Insurance
0.008
0.100
Insured
Reference
Reference
Uninsured
5.170 (1.817-14.711)
0.002
3.045 (1.031-8.992)
0.044
Unknown
0.921 (0.602-1.409)
0.705
0.871 (0.570-1.331)
0.525
Race
0.169
0.189
Hispanic (all races)
Reference
Reference
Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native
0.537 (0.067-4.315)
0.559
0.441 (0.054-3.577)
0.443
Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander
2.286 (0.699-7.476)
0.171
2.972 (0.896-9.864)
0.075
Non-Hispanic Black
2.554 (1.062-6.144)
0.036
2.255 (0.900-5.649)
0.083
Non-Hispanic White
1.334 (0.705-2.521)
0.376
1.486 (0.786-2.811)
0.223
TNM stage
0.486
0.030
I
Reference
Reference
II
1.776 (0.739-4.272)
0.199
2.549 (1.141-5.695)
0.023
III
1.527 (0.399-5.852)
0.537
3.466 (1.518-7.917)
0.003
IV
1.270 (0.173-9.334)
0.814
3.479 (1.197-10.112)
0.022
T stage
0.460
0.402
T1
Reference
Reference
T2
1.472 (0.644-3.362)
0.359
1.013 (0.493-2.085)
0.971
T3
1.063 (0.494-2.291)
0.875
0.699 (0.370-1.321)
0.270
T4
1.580 (0.521-4.797)
0.419
0.900 (0.372-2.178)
0.815
N stage
0.122
N0
Reference
N1
1.759 (0.810-3.817)
0.153
N2
2.415 (1.029-5.665)
0.043
N3
4.572 (1.044-20.021)
0.044
M stage
0.304
0.523
M0
Reference
Reference
M1
2.027 (0.527-7.799)
0.304
1.354 (0.534-3.433)
0.523
LODDS
0.001
4.55 ≤ LODDS ≤ 1.90
Reference
1.89 ≤ LODDS ≤ 0.15
1.742 (1.223-2.483)
0.002
0.16 ≤ LODDS ≤ 4.27
3.390 (1.620-7.093)
0.001
Radiation therapy
0.305
0.389
No radiation and/or cancer-directed surgery
Reference
Reference
Radiation prior to surgery
0.756 (0.503-1.134)
0.176
0.771 (0.515-1.153)
0.205
Radiation after surgery
1.037 (0.571-1.883)
0.906
0.998 (0.557-1.787)
0.994
Radiation before and after surgery
1.540 (0.455-5.218)
0.488
1.491 (0.444-5.008)
0.518
Table 3 Prognostic performance of different lymph node staging systems for overall survival
Model
C-Index
P value
AIC
P value
Model 1 (N stage)
0.656
< 0.001
1697.519
< 0.001
Model 2 (LODDS)
0.673
< 0.001
1688.824
< 0.001
Table 4 Prognostic performance of log odds of positive lymph nodes and N stage for overall survival in validation cohort
Variable
C-Index
P value
AIC
P value
N stage
0.648
0.030
770.094
< 0.001
LODDS
0.654
0.029
766.830
< 0.001
Citation: Wang F, Gao SG, Xue Q, Tan FW, Gao YS, Mao YS, Wang DL, Zhao J, Li Y, Yu XY, Cheng H, Zhao CG, Mu JW. Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(1): 24-35