Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2020; 8(8): 1424-1443
Published online Apr 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1424
Published online Apr 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1424
Table 1 Characteristics of right and left colon cancer patients
LCC (n = 100) | RCC (n = 44) | P value | |
Male | 64 (64.0%) | 22 (50.0%) | P = 0.163 |
Female | 36 (36.0%) | 22 (50.0%) | |
Age (mean ± SD) (yr) | 65.4 (± 10.3) | 65.5 (± 10.1) | P = 0.948 |
BMI (mean ± SD) (k/m2) | 28.0 (± 4.4) | 29.0 (± 6.6) | P = 0.225 |
Table 2 Clinical presentation and comorbidities with statistically significant differences between left and right colon cancer patients
Table 3 Disease stage, tumour size (T), infiltrated lymph nodes (N) and metastatic load (M) in right and left colon cancer patients at the time of diagnosis according to AJCC 8th edition, 2017
LCC (n = 100), n (%) | RCC (n = 44), n (%) | P value | ||
Stage | I | 7 (7.0) | 0 (0) | P = 0.230 |
II | 13 (13.0) | 8 (18.2) | ||
III | 25 (25.0) | 14 (31.8) | ||
IV | 55 (55.0) | 22 (50.0) | ||
T | T1-T2 | 11 (11.0) | 3 (6.8) | bP = 0.088 |
T3 | 61 (61.0) | 25 (56.8) | ||
T4 | 13 (13.0) | 13 (29.6) | ||
TX | 15 (15.0) | 3 (6.8) | ||
N | N0 | 28 (28.0) | 9 (20.5) | aP = 0.039 |
N1 | 32 (32.0) | 23 (52.3) | ||
N2 | 24 (24.0) | 5 (11.3) | ||
NX | 16 (16.0) | 7 (15.9) | ||
M | M0 | 45 (45.0) | 22 (50.0) | P = 0.446 |
M1a | 40 (40.0) | 13 (29.5) | ||
M1b | 15 (15.0) | 9 (20.5) |
Table 4 Histology, differentiation, and presence of necrosis, emboli (vascular and lymphatic) and perineural infiltration in patients with right and left colon cancer according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification
LCC (n = 100), n (%) | RCC (n = 44), n (%) | P value | ||
Histology | Adenocarcinoma | 95 (95.0) | 37 (84.1) | aP = 0.046 |
Mucinous | 4 (4.0) | 7 (15.9) | ||
Neuroendocrine | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0) | ||
Differentiation | Low | 19 (20.9) | 19 (46.3) | aP = 0.005 |
Moderate/High | 72 (79.1) | 22 (53.7) | ||
Necroses | No | 53 (62.4) | 24 (61.5) | P = 1.000 |
Yes | 32 (37.6) | 15 (38.5) | ||
Emboli | No | 68 (82.9) | 34 (87.2) | P = 0.606 |
Yes | 14 (17.1) | 5 (12.8) | ||
Perineural infiltration | No | 71 (87.7) | 36 (92.3) | P = 0.544 |
Yes | 10 (12.3) | 3 (7.7) |
Table 5 KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and MSI-related genes in right and left colon cancer patients
LCC (n = 100), n (%) | RCC (n = 44), n (%) | Total, n (%) | P value | |
KRAS wild type | 60 (63.8) | 17 (42.5) | 77 (57.5) | aP = 0.036 |
KRAS mutant | 34 (36.2) | 23 (57.5) | 57 (42.5) | |
NRAS wild type | 80 (95.2) | 29 (100.0) | 109 (96.5) | P = 0.571 |
NRAS mutant | 4 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 4 (3.5) | |
RAS wild type | 56 (59.6) | 17 (42.5) | 73 (54.5) | P = 0.104 |
RAS mutant | 38 (40.4) | 23 (57.5) | 61 (45.5) | |
BRAF wild type | 60 (93.8) | 23 (82.1) | 83 (90.2) | P = 0.125 |
BRAF mutant | 4 (6.2) | 5 (17.9) | 9 (9.8) | |
MSS | 51 (94.4) | 29 (93.5) | 80 (94.1) | P = 1.000 |
MSI-H | 3 (5.6) | 2 (6.5) | 5 (5.9) |
Table 6 Adjuvant and perioperative therapy across disease stages and locations
Stage | Location | FOLFOX | XELOX | RT-capecitabine | RT-capecitabine-XELOX | Total |
II | LCC | 3 | 5 | 5 | - | 13 |
RCC | 3 | 5 | - | - | 8 | |
III | LCC | 3 | 11 | - | 11 | 25 |
RCC | 2 | 12 | - | - | 14 | |
Total | LCC | 6 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 38 |
RCC | 5 | 17 | - | - | 22 | |
Total | 11 | 33 | 5 | 11 | 60 |
Table 7 Cox regression analysis of disease recurrence
Table 8 Administered chemotherapy regimens in the first-line setting according to primary tumour location
FOLFOX, n (%) | FOLFIRI, n (%) | Cisplatin-etoposide (%) | Total, n (%) | |
LCC | 61 (53.0) | 21 (18.3) | 1 (0.9) | 83 (72.2) |
RCC | 19 (16.5) | 13 (11.3) | - | 32 (27.8) |
Total | 80 (69.5) | 34 (29.6) | 1 (0.9) | 115 (100) |
Table 9 Administered antibodies in the first-line setting according to RAS mutation status and progression-free survival time
RAS status | Bevacizumab, n (%) | PFS | Panitumumab, n (%) | PFS | Total, n (%) | PFS | |
LCC | RAS wild type | 20 (17.6) | 12.3 | 27 (23.7) | 15.8 | 47 (41.3) | 14.0 |
RAS mutant | 35 (30.7) | 11.6 | - | - | 35 (30.7) | 11.6 | |
Total | 55 (48.3) | 11.6 | 27 (23.7) | 15.8 | 82 (72.0) | 12.2 | |
RCC | RAS wild type | 4 (3.4) | 22.2 | 8 (7.0) | 5.5 | 12 (10.4) | 13.8 |
RAS mutant | 20 (17.6) | 10 | - | - | 20 (17.6) | 10 | |
Total | 24 (21.0) | 12.6 | 8 (7.0) | 5.5 | 32 (28.0) | 12.5 | |
Total | 79 (69.3) | 12 | 35 (30.7) | 14.5 | 114 (100.0) | 12.3 |
Table 10 Cox regression analysis of first-line chemotherapy
P value | HR | 95%CI | |
BRAF wild type | (Ref cat) | ||
BRAF mutant | aP = 0.040 | 2.454 | 1.044-5.772 |
KRAS/NRAS | 0.202 | ||
Location | 0.166 | ||
Histology | 0.636 | ||
Sex | 0.405 | ||
Age | 0.906 | ||
Antibody | 0.748 | ||
Initial stage | 0.217 |
Table 11 Administered chemotherapy regimens in the second-line setting according to primary tumour location
FOLFOX, n (%) | FOLFIRI, n (%) | Total, n (%) | |
LCC | 19 (19.4) | 55 (56.1) | 74 (75.5) |
RCC | 8 (8.2) | 16 (16.3) | 24 (24.5) |
Total | 27 (27.6) | 71 (72.4) | 98 (100.0) |
Table 12 Administered antibodies in the second-line setting according to RAS mutation status and time to progression-free survival
RAS status | Bevacizumab, n (%) | PFS | Panitumumab, n (%) | PFS | Aflibercept, n (%) | PFS | Total, n (%) | PFS | |
LCC | RAS wild type | 16 (16.5) | 7.4 | 20 (20.6) | 8.1 | 10 (10.3) | 6.8 | 46 (47.4) | 7.9 |
RAS mutant | 9 (9.3) | 9 | - | - | 19 (19.6) | 9.3 | 28 (28.9) | 9.0 | |
Total | 25 (25.8) | 7.4 | 20 (20.6) | 8.1 | 29 (29.9) | 8.2 | 74 (76.3) | 8.2 | |
RCC | RAS wild type | 2 (2.1) | 4.4 | 6 (6.2) | 12.3 | 1 (1.0) | 7.7 | 9 (9.3) | 9.0 |
RAS mutant | 7 (7.3) | 10.4 | - | - | 7 (7.3) | 7.0 | 14 (14.4) | 12.3 | |
Total | 9 (9.3) | 10.4 | 6 (6.2) | 12.3 | 8 (8.3) | 7.1 | 23 (23.4) | 8.6 | |
34 (34.5) | 9.0 | 26 (26.8) | 9.7 | 37 (38.1) | 7.6 | 97 (100) | 8.6 |
Table 13 Overall survival depending on the combination of administered antibodies in first- and second-line chemotherapy
First line | Second line | Median OS (mo) | P value |
Bevacizumab | Bevacizumab | 58.4 | P = 0.693 |
Panitumumab | Bevacizumab | 44.9 | |
Bevacizumab | Panitumumab | 51.7 | |
Panitumumab | Panitumumab | 46.7 | |
Bevacizumab | Aflibercept | 44.0 | |
Panitumumab | Aflibercept | 62.3 |
Table 14 Cox regression analysis of overall survival
P value | HR | 95%CI | |
KRAS wild type/NRAS wild type | (Ref cat) | ||
KRAS mutant | aP = 0.017 | 2.313 | 1.162-4.605 |
Initial stage I-III | (Ref cat) | ||
Initial stage IV | aP < 0.001 | 4.036 | 1.922-8.475 |
BRAF | 0.373 | ||
Location | 0.937 | ||
Histology | 0.259 | ||
Sex | 0.602 | ||
Age | 0.250 | ||
Lymph nodes | 0.407 | ||
Differentiation grade | 0.142 | ||
Presence of necrosis | 0.375 | ||
Presence of emboli | 0.783 |
- Citation: Kalantzis I, Nonni A, Pavlakis K, Delicha EM, Miltiadou K, Kosmas C, Ziras N, Gkoumas K, Gakiopoulou H. Clinicopathological differences and correlations between right and left colon cancer. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(8): 1424-1443
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i8/1424.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1424