Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2020; 8(8): 1424-1443
Published online Apr 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1424
Table 1 Characteristics of right and left colon cancer patients
LCC (n = 100)RCC (n = 44)P value
Male64 (64.0%)22 (50.0%)P = 0.163
Female36 (36.0%)22 (50.0%)
Age (mean ± SD) (yr)65.4 (± 10.3)65.5 (± 10.1)P = 0.948
BMI (mean ± SD) (k/m2)28.0 (± 4.4)29.0 (± 6.6)P = 0.225
Table 2 Clinical presentation and comorbidities with statistically significant differences between left and right colon cancer patients
LCC (n = 100), n (%)RCC (n = 44), n (%)P value
Anaemia13 (13.1)14 (31.8)aP = 0.008
Rectal bleeding46 (46.5)9 (20.5)aP = 0.003
Feeling of incomplete evacuation26 (26.3)5 (11.4)aP = 0.005
Coronary heart disease9 (9.0)9 (20.5)bP = 0.056
Diabetes mellitus8 (8.2)10 (13.6)aP = 0.016
Table 3 Disease stage, tumour size (T), infiltrated lymph nodes (N) and metastatic load (M) in right and left colon cancer patients at the time of diagnosis according to AJCC 8th edition, 2017
LCC (n = 100), n (%)RCC (n = 44), n (%)P value
StageI7 (7.0)0 (0)P = 0.230
II13 (13.0)8 (18.2)
III25 (25.0)14 (31.8)
IV55 (55.0)22 (50.0)
TT1-T211 (11.0)3 (6.8)bP = 0.088
T361 (61.0)25 (56.8)
T413 (13.0)13 (29.6)
TX15 (15.0)3 (6.8)
NN028 (28.0)9 (20.5)aP = 0.039
N132 (32.0)23 (52.3)
N224 (24.0)5 (11.3)
NX16 (16.0)7 (15.9)
MM045 (45.0)22 (50.0)P = 0.446
M1a40 (40.0)13 (29.5)
M1b15 (15.0)9 (20.5)
Table 4 Histology, differentiation, and presence of necrosis, emboli (vascular and lymphatic) and perineural infiltration in patients with right and left colon cancer according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification
LCC (n = 100), n (%)RCC (n = 44), n (%)P value
HistologyAdenocarcinoma95 (95.0)37 (84.1)aP = 0.046
Mucinous4 (4.0)7 (15.9)
Neuroendocrine1 (1.0)0 (0)
DifferentiationLow19 (20.9)19 (46.3)aP = 0.005
Moderate/High72 (79.1)22 (53.7)
NecrosesNo53 (62.4)24 (61.5)P = 1.000
Yes32 (37.6)15 (38.5)
EmboliNo68 (82.9)34 (87.2)P = 0.606
Yes14 (17.1)5 (12.8)
Perineural infiltrationNo71 (87.7)36 (92.3)P = 0.544
Yes10 (12.3)3 (7.7)
Table 5  KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and MSI-related genes in right and left colon cancer patients
LCC (n = 100), n (%)RCC (n = 44), n (%)Total, n (%)P value
KRAS wild type60 (63.8)17 (42.5)77 (57.5)aP = 0.036
KRAS mutant34 (36.2)23 (57.5)57 (42.5)
NRAS wild type80 (95.2)29 (100.0)109 (96.5)P = 0.571
NRAS mutant4 (4.8)0 (0)4 (3.5)
RAS wild type56 (59.6)17 (42.5)73 (54.5)P = 0.104
RAS mutant38 (40.4)23 (57.5)61 (45.5)
BRAF wild type60 (93.8)23 (82.1)83 (90.2)P = 0.125
BRAF mutant4 (6.2)5 (17.9)9 (9.8)
MSS51 (94.4)29 (93.5)80 (94.1)P = 1.000
MSI-H3 (5.6)2 (6.5)5 (5.9)
Table 6 Adjuvant and perioperative therapy across disease stages and locations
StageLocationFOLFOXXELOXRT-capecitabineRT-capecitabine-XELOXTotal
IILCC355-13
RCC35--8
IIILCC311-1125
RCC212--14
TotalLCC61651138
RCC517--22
Total113351160
Table 7 Cox regression analysis of disease recurrence
P valueHR95%CI
KRAS wild-type/NRAS mutant (Ref cat)
KRAS mutantaP = 0.0023.7311.635-8.513
Presence of emboliaP = 0.0253.2211.161-8.938
Location0.286
Histology0.339
Sex0.797
Age0.336
Lymph node involvement0.465
Grade0.533
Necroses0.911
Initial stage0.216
Table 8 Administered chemotherapy regimens in the first-line setting according to primary tumour location
FOLFOX, n (%)FOLFIRI, n (%)Cisplatin-etoposide (%)Total, n (%)
LCC61 (53.0)21 (18.3)1 (0.9)83 (72.2)
RCC19 (16.5)13 (11.3)-32 (27.8)
Total80 (69.5)34 (29.6)1 (0.9)115 (100)
Table 9 Administered antibodies in the first-line setting according to RAS mutation status and progression-free survival time
RAS statusBevacizumab, n (%)PFSPanitumumab, n (%)PFSTotal, n (%)PFS
LCCRAS wild type20 (17.6)12.327 (23.7)15.847 (41.3)14.0
RAS mutant35 (30.7)11.6--35 (30.7)11.6
Total55 (48.3)11.627 (23.7)15.882 (72.0)12.2
RCCRAS wild type4 (3.4)22.28 (7.0)5.512 (10.4)13.8
RAS mutant20 (17.6)10--20 (17.6)10
Total24 (21.0)12.68 (7.0)5.532 (28.0)12.5
Total79 (69.3)1235 (30.7)14.5114 (100.0)12.3
Table 10 Cox regression analysis of first-line chemotherapy
P valueHR95%CI
BRAF wild type(Ref cat)
BRAF mutantaP = 0.0402.4541.044-5.772
KRAS/NRAS0.202
Location0.166
Histology0.636
Sex0.405
Age0.906
Antibody0.748
Initial stage0.217
Table 11 Administered chemotherapy regimens in the second-line setting according to primary tumour location
FOLFOX, n (%)FOLFIRI, n (%)Total, n (%)
LCC19 (19.4)55 (56.1)74 (75.5)
RCC8 (8.2)16 (16.3)24 (24.5)
Total27 (27.6)71 (72.4)98 (100.0)
Table 12 Administered antibodies in the second-line setting according to RAS mutation status and time to progression-free survival
RAS statusBevacizumab, n (%)PFSPanitumumab, n (%)PFSAflibercept, n (%)PFSTotal, n (%)PFS
LCCRAS wild type16 (16.5)7.420 (20.6)8.110 (10.3)6.846 (47.4)7.9
RAS mutant9 (9.3)9--19 (19.6)9.328 (28.9)9.0
Total25 (25.8)7.420 (20.6)8.129 (29.9)8.274 (76.3)8.2
RCCRAS wild type2 (2.1)4.46 (6.2)12.31 (1.0)7.79 (9.3)9.0
RAS mutant7 (7.3)10.4--7 (7.3)7.014 (14.4)12.3
Total9 (9.3)10.46 (6.2)12.38 (8.3)7.123 (23.4)8.6
34 (34.5)9.026 (26.8)9.737 (38.1)7.697 (100)8.6
Table 13 Overall survival depending on the combination of administered antibodies in first- and second-line chemotherapy
First lineSecond lineMedian OS (mo)P value
BevacizumabBevacizumab58.4P = 0.693
PanitumumabBevacizumab44.9
BevacizumabPanitumumab51.7
PanitumumabPanitumumab46.7
BevacizumabAflibercept44.0
PanitumumabAflibercept62.3
Table 14 Cox regression analysis of overall survival
P valueHR95%CI
KRAS wild type/NRAS wild type(Ref cat)
KRAS mutantaP = 0.0172.3131.162-4.605
Initial stage I-III(Ref cat)
Initial stage IVaP < 0.0014.0361.922-8.475
BRAF0.373
Location0.937
Histology0.259
Sex0.602
Age0.250
Lymph nodes0.407
Differentiation grade0.142
Presence of necrosis0.375
Presence of emboli0.783