Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2020; 8(5): 874-886
Published online Mar 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i5.874
Published online Mar 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i5.874
Table 1 Primer sequence
R (5’-3’) | F (5’-3’) | |
GDF11 | GTCATTAGCATGGCCCAGGA | GGCCTTCAGTACCTTTGTGAACATC |
PD-1 | GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC | CCGCTAGGAAAGACAATGGTG |
GAPDH | GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC | TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA |
Table 2 Comparison of general data in the two groups, n (%)
Research group (n = 89) | Control group (n = 95) | χ2 or t | P value | |
Age (yr) | 0.888 | 0.376 | ||
49.2 ± 8.6 | 50.3 ± 8.2 | |||
BMI (kg/cm2) | 0.963 | 0.337 | ||
23.62 ± 3.52 | 24.16 ± 4.05 | |||
Disease course (mo) | 0.174 | 0.862 | ||
7.62 ± 4.16 | 7.51 ± 4.38 | |||
Gender | 0.870 | 0.351 | ||
Male | 62 (69.66) | 60 (63.16) | ||
Female | 27 (30.34) | 35 (36.84) | ||
Smoking | 0.095 | 0.758 | ||
Yes | 60 (65.26) | 62 (65.26) | ||
No | 29 (32.58) | 33 (34.74) | ||
Drinking | 0.684 | 0.408 | ||
Yes | 55 (61.80) | 53 (55.79) | ||
No | 34 (38.20) | 42 (44.21) | ||
Preference for betel nut | 0.284 | 0.594 | ||
Yes | 65 (73.03) | 66 (69.47) | ||
No | 24 (26.97) | 29 (30.53) | ||
Dietary preference | 0.432 | 0.511 | ||
Spicy | 52 (58.43) | 60 (63.16) | ||
Light | 37 (41.57) | 35 (36.84) | ||
Exercise habits | 0.382 | 0.537 | ||
Yes | 12 (13.48) | 10 (10.53) | ||
No | 77 (86.52) | 85 (89.47) | ||
Tissue type | 0.486 | 0.975 | ||
Squamous cell carcinoma | 38 (42.70) | 38 (40.00) | ||
Malignant lymphoma | 16 (17.98) | 15 (15.79) | ||
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma | 18 (20.22) | 22 (23.16) | ||
Adenoid cystic carcinoma | 10 (11.24) | 12 (12.63) | ||
Adenocarcinoma | 7(7.87) | 8 (8.42) | ||
Pathological staging | 0.354 | 0.552 | ||
I-II | 16 (17.98) | 14 (14.74) | ||
III-IV | 73 (82.02) | 81 (85.26) | ||
Metastasis | 0.000 | 0.991 | ||
Yes | 75 (84.27) | 80 (84.21) | ||
No | 14 (15.73) | 15 (15.79) | ||
Degree of differentiation | 0.368 | 0.051 | ||
Poorly differentiated | 79 (88.76) | 80 (84.21) | ||
Moderately and highly differentiated | 10 (11.24) | 15 (15.79) | ||
Nationality | 0.812 | 0.368 | ||
Han | 85 (95.51) | 89 (93.68) | ||
Ethnic minorities | 4 (4.49) | 6 (6.32) | ||
Living environment | 0.367 | 0.545 | ||
Cities and towns | 62 (69.66) | 70 (73.68) | ||
Countryside | 27 (30.34) | 25 (26.32) |
Table 3 Comparison of efficacy between the two groups, n (%)
Research group (n = 89) | Control group (n = 95) | χ2 | P value | |
CR | 33 (37.08) | 20 (21.05) | ||
PR | 35 (39.33) | 38 (40.00) | ||
NC | 15 (16.85) | 22 (23.16) | ||
PD | 6 (6.74) | 15 (15.79) | ||
Cure rate (%) | 5.017 | 0.025 | ||
76.40 | 61.05 |
Table 4 Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups, n (%)
Research group (n = 89) | Control group (n = 95) | χ2 | P value | |
Spinal cord injury | 0 (0.00) | 3 (3.16) | ||
Laryngeal edema | 1 (1.12) | 7 (7.37) | ||
Vascular embolism | 0 (0.00) | 4 (4.21) | ||
Pain in operation area | 0 (0.00) | 9 (9.47) | ||
Radiation skin injury (Total) | 20 (26.97) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Degree 0 | 65 (73.03) | - | ||
Degree I | 14 (15.73) | - | ||
Degree II | 9 (10.11) | - | ||
Degree III | 1 (1.12) | - | ||
Degree IV | 0 (0.00) | - | ||
Total incidence rate (%) | 0.010 | 0.922 | ||
23.60 | 24.21 |
Table 5 Comparison of recurrence between the two groups, n (%)
Research group (n = 89) | Control group (n = 95) | χ2 | P value | |
Recurrence | 5.406 | 0.020 | ||
Yes | 13 (13.48) | 26 (27.37) | ||
No | 77 (86.52) | 69 (72.63) |
Table 6 Predictive value of growth differentiation factor 11 and programmed death receptor-1 for efficacy
GDF11 | PD-1 | GDF11 + PD-1 | |
AUC | 0.704 | 0.729 | 0.848 |
Std. Error | 0.040 | 0.039 | 0.028 |
95%CI | 0.624-0.783 | 0.652-0.806 | 0.793-0.902 |
Cut-off | 2.605 | 1.565 | 0.314 |
Sensitivity (%) | 63.79 | 53.45 | 96.55 |
Specificity (%) | 69.92 | 83.74 | 67.48 |
P | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 7 Predictive value of growth differentiation factor 11 and programmed death receptor-1 for recurrence after treatment
GDF11 | PD-1 | GDF11 + PD-1 | |
AUC | 0.772 | 0.750 | 0.881 |
Std. Error | 0.040 | 0.045 | 0.036 |
95%CI | 0.694-0.850 | 0.662-0836 | 0.810-0.952 |
Cut-off | 1.655 | 1.125 | 0.310 |
Sensitivity (%) | 92.46 | 61.54 | 82.05 |
Specificity (%) | 46.48 | 77.46 | 88.73 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Xue G, Feng Y, Li JB. Significance of 125I radioactive seed implantation on growth differentiation factor and programmed death receptor-1 during treatment of oral cancer. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(5): 874-886
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i5/874.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i5.874