Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2020; 8(24): 6229-6242
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6229
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6229
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Variable | TLN ≥ 12 (group A, n = 177) | TLN < 12 (group B, n = 54) | P value |
Sex (n, %) | 0.591 | ||
Male | 121 (68.4) | 39 (72.2) | |
Female | 56 (31.6) | 15 (27.8) | |
Age (yr) | 60 (51-65) | 59.5 (52.75-66.5) | 0.544 |
ASA score (n, %) | 0.488 | ||
1 | 5 (2.8) | 2 (3.7) | |
2 | 139 (78.6) | 39 (72.2) | |
3 | 33 (18.6) | 13 (24.1) | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 (21.9-26.4) | 23.4 (21.5-25.2) | 0.423 |
cT, n (%) | 0.975 | ||
2 | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0) | |
3 | 137 (77.4) | 43 (79.6) | |
4 | 38 (21.5) | 11 (20.4) | |
cN, n (%) | 0.109 | ||
0 | 44 (24.9) | 18 (33.3) | |
1 | 91 (51.4) | 28 (51.9) | |
2 | 42 (23.7) | 8 (14.8) | |
Preoperative CEA (μg/L) | 2.99 (1.55-5.57) | 3 (1.68-5.57) | 0.729 |
ypT, n (%) | 0.140 | ||
0 | 26 (14.7) | 14 (25.9) | |
1 | 4 (2.3) | 1 (1.9) | |
2 | 37 (20.9) | 11 (20.4) | |
3 | 97 (54.8) | 24 (44.4) | |
4 | 13 (7.3) | 4 (7.4) | |
ypN, n (%) | 0.026 | ||
0 | 90 (50.8) | 38 (70.4) | |
1 | 64 (36.2) | 10 (18.5) | |
2 | 23 (13) | 6 (11.1) | |
TRG, n (%) | 0.312 | ||
0 | 14 (7.9) | 4 (7.4) | |
1 | 26 (14.7) | 7 (13) | |
2 | 78 (44.1) | 22 (40.7) | |
3 | 33 (18.6) | 7 (13) | |
4 | 26 (14.7) | 14 (25.9) | |
No downstaging, n (%) | 98 (55.4) | 20 (37) | 0.019 |
Downstaging, n (%) | 56 (31.6) | 21 (38.9) | 0.324 |
pCR, n (%) | 26 (14.7) | 14 (25.9) | 0.057 |
Positive lymph nodes, n (%) | 0 (0-1) | 0 (0-0) | 0.003 |
LNR | 0 (0-0.68) | 0 (0-0) | 0.012 |
Radiotherapy dose, n (%) | 0.557 | ||
45-50.4 Gy/28 F | 125 (70.6) | 39 (72.2) | |
< 45 Gy/25 F | 34 (19.2) | 5 (9.3) | |
25 Gy/5 F | 18 (10.2) | 10 (18.5) | |
Preoperative concurrent chemotherapy regimen, n (%) | 0.376 | ||
Capecitabine+ oxaliplatin | 54 (30.5) | 17 (31.5) | |
Capecitabine, oral | 108 (61) | 37 (68.5) | |
Fluorouracil union | 15 (8.5) | 0 (0) | |
Tumor location, DAV (cm) | 5 (3-7) | 5 (3-7) | 0.605 |
Interval, w (%) | 8 (6.5-11) | 10 (8-16) | 0.001 |
Surgical procedure | 0.018 | ||
Miles (n, %) | 74 (41.8) | 26 (48.2) | |
Dixon (n, %) | 93 (52.5) | 20 (37) | |
Hartmann (n, %) | 10 (5.6) | 8 (14.8) | |
LLND (n, %) | 20 (11.3) | 1 (1.9) | 0.035 |
Multivisceral resection (n, %) | 10 (5.6) | 2 (3.7) | 0.574 |
PNI (n, %) | 0.819 | ||
Yes | 42 (23.7) | 12 (22.2) | |
No | 135 (76.3) | 42 (77.8) | |
Intravascular tumor embolus (n, %) | 0.463 | ||
Yes | 23 (13) | 5 (9.3) | |
No | 154 (87) | 49 (90.7) | |
Degree of differentiation, n (%) | 0.367 | ||
Low and low-middle grades | 18 (10.2) | 9 (16.7) | |
Middle, high-middle, and high grades | 132 (74.6) | 43 (79.6) | |
Signet-ring and mucinous adenocarcinoma | 4 (2.3) | 2 (3.7) |
Table 2 Binary regression analysis
P value | OR | 95%CI | |
No downstaging | 0.640 | 0.797 | 0.309-2.061 |
Positive lymph nodes | 0.152 | 0.873 | 0.725-1.051 |
ypN0 vs ypN2 | 0.059 | 8.239 | 0.92-73.794 |
ypN1 vs ypN2 | 0.442 | 2.228 | 0.289-17.163 |
LNR | 0.039 | 66.666 | 1.239-3587.217 |
Interval | 0.002 | 1.084 | 1.029-1.142 |
LLND | 0.086 | 0.165 | 0.021-1.287 |
Table 3 Oncologic outcomes
Variable | TLN ≥ 12 (group A, n = 177) | TLN < 12 (group B, n = 54) | P value |
Local recurrence, n (%) | 14 (7.9) | 7 (13) | 0.259 |
Distant recurrence, n (%) | 35 (19.8) | 20 (37) | 0.009 |
Death, n (%) | 27 (15.3) | 9 (16.7) | 0.803 |
Table 4 Results of Kaplan-Meier analysis
Variable | No. of cases | DFS P value | OS P value |
Sex (n, %) | 0.708 | 0.655 | |
Male | 160 (69.3) | ||
Female | 71 (30.7) | ||
Age (yr) | 0.86 | 0.968 | |
< 60 | 111 (48.1) | ||
≥ 60 | 120 (51.9) | ||
ASA score (n, %) | 0.912 | 0.951 | |
1 | 7 (3) | ||
2 | 178 (77) | ||
3 | 46 (19.9) | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.519 | 0.512 | |
< 25 | 149 (64.5) | ||
≥ 25 | 82 (35.5) | ||
cT, n (%) | 0.606 | 0.476 | |
2 | 2 (0.9) | ||
3 | 180 (77.9) | ||
4 | 49 (21.2) | ||
cN, n (%) | 0.003 | 0.063 | |
0 | 79 (34.2) | ||
1 | 112 (48.5) | ||
2 | 40 (17.3) | ||
ypT, n (%) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
0 | 36 (15.6) | ||
1 | 6 (2.6) | ||
2 | 50 (21.6) | ||
3 | 122 (52.8) | ||
4 | 17 (7.4) | ||
ypN, n (%) | < 0.001 | 0.097 | |
0 | 128 (55.4) | ||
1 | 74 (32) | ||
2 | 29 (12.6) | ||
TLN, n (%) | 0.006 | 0.737 | |
< 12 | 54 (23.4) | ||
≥ 12 | 177 (76.6) | ||
Positive lymph nodes, n (%) | < 0.001 | 0.063 | |
< 2 | 182 (78.8) | ||
≥ 2 | 49 (21.2) | ||
LNR | < 0.001 | 0.058 | |
≤ 0.03 | |||
> 0.03 | |||
Preoperative concurrent chemotherapy regimen, n (%) | 0.148 | 0.561 | |
Capecitabine+ oxaliplatin | 58 (25.1) | ||
Capecitabine, oral | 140 (60.6) | ||
Oxaliplatin combination | 22 (9.5) | ||
Postoperative chemotherapy | 0.933 | 0.869 | |
Yes | 153 (66.2) | ||
No | 78 (33.8) | ||
Interval, w (%) | 0.044 | 0.567 | |
≤ 8 wk | 139 (60.2) | ||
> 8 wk | 92 (39.8) | ||
Surgical procedure | 0.168 | 0.662 | |
Miles (n, %) | 100 (43.3) | ||
Dixon (n, %) | 113 (48.9) | ||
Hartmann (n, %) | 18 (7.8) | ||
LLND (n, %) | 21 (9.1) | 0.868 | 0.994 |
Multivisceral resection (n, %) | 12 (5.2) | 0.025 | 0.948 |
Preoperative CEA (μg/L) | 0.344 | 0.663 | |
< 5 | 166 (71.9) | ||
≥ 5 | 65 (28.1) | ||
PNI (n, %) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
Yes | 54 (23.4) | ||
No | 177 (76.6) | ||
Intravascular tumor embolus (n, %) | < 0.001 | 0.004 | |
Yes | 28 (12.1) | ||
No | 203 (87.9) | ||
Degree of differentiation, n (%) | 0.028 | 0.152 | |
Low and low-middle grades | 32 (13.9) | ||
Middle, high-middle, and high grades | 193 (83.5) | ||
Signet-ring and mucinous adenocarcinoma | 6 (2.6) |
Table 5 Results of Cox regression analysis of disease-free survival and overall survival
Disease-free survival | Overall survival | |||||
P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | |
cN0 vs cN1 | 0.620 | 0.794 | 0.318-1.978 | 0.801 | 0.84 | 0.217-3.249 |
cN0 vs cN2 | 0.496 | 1.281 | 0.628-2.610 | 0.296 | 1.712 | 0.625-4.693 |
ypT0 vs ypT4 | < 0.001 | 0.074 | 0.019-0.288 | 0.011 | 0.11 | 0.02-0.607 |
ypT1 vs ypT4 | 0.338 | 0.46 | 0.094-2.253 | 0.494 | 0.464 | 0.051-4.202 |
ypT2 vs ypT4 | < 0.001 | 0.097 | 0.032-0.301 | 0.002 | 0.035 | 0.004-0.305 |
ypT3 vs ypT4 | 0.014 | 0.418 | 0.209-0.837 | 0.011 | 0.309 | 0.125-0.761 |
ypN0 vs ypN1 | 0.745 | 0.823 | 0.254-2.664 | 0.805 | 1.245 | 0.219-7.086 |
ypN0 vs ypN2 | 0.706 | 1.178 | 0.504-2.756 | 0.816 | 1.156 | 0.341-3.92 |
TLN (≥ 12 vs < 12 | < 0.001 | 0.302 | 0.172-0.531 | 0.606 | 0.8 | 0.342-1.871 |
LNR (≤ 0.03 vs 0.03) | 0.840 | 0.914 | 0.379-2.20 | 0.768 | 1.228 | 0.314-4.799 |
Positive lymph nodes (≥ 2 vs < 2) | 0.828 | 1.1 | 0.466-2.593 | 0.978 | 0.982 | 0.271-3.562 |
Interval (≤ 8 wk vs > 8 wk) | 0.236 | 1.369 | 0.814-2.303 | 0.626 | 0.836 | 0.408-1.715 |
Multivisceral resection | 0.119 | 1.875 | 0.851-4.13 | 0.792 | 0.816 | 0.181-3.69 |
PNI | 0.051 | 1.8 | 0.998-3.248 | 0.002 | 3.747 | 1.634-8.592 |
Intravascular tumor embolus | 0.244 | 1.479 | 0.766-2.858 | 0.584 | 1.292 | 0.517-3.23 |
Degree of differentiation | ||||||
Low and low-middle grades vs signet-ring and mucinous adenocarcinoma | 0.695 | 0.739 | 0.163-3.354 | 0.811 | 0.76 | 0.08-7.221 |
Middle, high-middle, and high grades vs signet-ring and mucinous adenocarcinoma | 0.929 | 0.930 | 0.19-4.564 | 0.913 | 1.141 | 0.106-12.243 |
- Citation: Mei SW, Liu Z, Wang Z, Pei W, Wei FZ, Chen JN, Wang ZJ, Shen HY, Li J, Zhao FQ, Wang XS, Liu Q. Impact factors of lymph node retrieval on survival in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant therapy. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(24): 6229-6242
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i24/6229.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6229