Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2020; 8(24): 6229-6242
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i24.6229
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Variable
TLN ≥ 12 (group A, n = 177)
TLN < 12 (group B, n = 54)
P value
Sex (n, %)0.591
Male121 (68.4)39 (72.2)
Female56 (31.6)15 (27.8)
Age (yr)60 (51-65)59.5 (52.75-66.5)0.544
ASA score (n, %)0.488
15 (2.8)2 (3.7)
2139 (78.6)39 (72.2)
333 (18.6)13 (24.1)
BMI (kg/m2)23.8 (21.9-26.4)23.4 (21.5-25.2)0.423
cT, n (%)0.975
22 (1.1)0 (0)
3137 (77.4)43 (79.6)
438 (21.5)11 (20.4)
cN, n (%)0.109
044 (24.9)18 (33.3)
191 (51.4)28 (51.9)
242 (23.7)8 (14.8)
Preoperative CEA (μg/L)2.99 (1.55-5.57)3 (1.68-5.57)0.729
ypT, n (%)0.140
026 (14.7)14 (25.9)
14 (2.3)1 (1.9)
237 (20.9)11 (20.4)
397 (54.8)24 (44.4)
413 (7.3)4 (7.4)
ypN, n (%)0.026
090 (50.8)38 (70.4)
164 (36.2)10 (18.5)
223 (13)6 (11.1)
TRG, n (%)0.312
014 (7.9)4 (7.4)
126 (14.7)7 (13)
278 (44.1)22 (40.7)
333 (18.6)7 (13)
426 (14.7)14 (25.9)
No downstaging, n (%)98 (55.4)20 (37)0.019
Downstaging, n (%)56 (31.6)21 (38.9)0.324
pCR, n (%)26 (14.7)14 (25.9)0.057
Positive lymph nodes, n (%)0 (0-1)0 (0-0)0.003
LNR0 (0-0.68)0 (0-0)0.012
Radiotherapy dose, n (%)0.557
45-50.4 Gy/28 F125 (70.6)39 (72.2)
< 45 Gy/25 F34 (19.2)5 (9.3)
25 Gy/5 F18 (10.2)10 (18.5)
Preoperative concurrent chemotherapy regimen, n (%)0.376
Capecitabine+ oxaliplatin54 (30.5)17 (31.5)
Capecitabine, oral108 (61)37 (68.5)
Fluorouracil union15 (8.5)0 (0)
Tumor location, DAV (cm)5 (3-7)5 (3-7)0.605
Interval, w (%)8 (6.5-11)10 (8-16)0.001
Surgical procedure0.018
Miles (n, %)74 (41.8)26 (48.2)
Dixon (n, %)93 (52.5)20 (37)
Hartmann (n, %)10 (5.6)8 (14.8)
LLND (n, %)20 (11.3)1 (1.9)0.035
Multivisceral resection (n, %)10 (5.6)2 (3.7)0.574
PNI (n, %)0.819
Yes42 (23.7)12 (22.2)
No135 (76.3)42 (77.8)
Intravascular tumor embolus (n, %)0.463
Yes23 (13)5 (9.3)
No154 (87)49 (90.7)
Degree of differentiation, n (%) 0.367
Low and low-middle grades 18 (10.2)9 (16.7)
Middle, high-middle, and high grades 132 (74.6)43 (79.6)
Signet-ring and mucinous adenocarcinoma4 (2.3)2 (3.7)
Table 2 Binary regression analysis

P value
OR
95%CI
No downstaging0.6400.7970.309-2.061
Positive lymph nodes0.1520.8730.725-1.051
ypN0 vs ypN20.0598.2390.92-73.794
ypN1 vs ypN20.4422.2280.289-17.163
LNR0.03966.6661.239-3587.217
Interval 0.0021.0841.029-1.142
LLND0.0860.1650.021-1.287
Table 3 Oncologic outcomes
Variable
TLN ≥ 12 (group A, n = 177)
TLN < 12 (group B, n = 54)
P value
Local recurrence, n (%)14 (7.9)7 (13)0.259
Distant recurrence, n (%)35 (19.8)20 (37)0.009
Death, n (%)27 (15.3)9 (16.7)0.803
Table 4 Results of Kaplan-Meier analysis
Variable
No. of cases
DFS P value
OS P value
Sex (n, %)0.7080.655
Male160 (69.3)
Female71 (30.7)
Age (yr)0.860.968
< 60111 (48.1)
≥ 60120 (51.9)
ASA score (n, %)0.9120.951
17 (3)
2178 (77)
346 (19.9)
BMI (kg/m2)0.5190.512
< 25149 (64.5)
≥ 2582 (35.5)
cT, n (%)0.6060.476
22 (0.9)
3180 (77.9)
449 (21.2)
cN, n (%)0.0030.063
079 (34.2)
1112 (48.5)
240 (17.3)
ypT, n (%)< 0.001< 0.001
036 (15.6)
16 (2.6)
250 (21.6)
3122 (52.8)
417 (7.4)
ypN, n (%)< 0.0010.097
0128 (55.4)
174 (32)
229 (12.6)
TLN, n (%)0.0060.737
< 1254 (23.4)
≥ 12177 (76.6)
Positive lymph nodes, n (%)< 0.0010.063
< 2182 (78.8)
≥ 249 (21.2)
LNR< 0.0010.058
≤ 0.03
> 0.03
Preoperative concurrent chemotherapy regimen, n (%)0.1480.561
Capecitabine+ oxaliplatin58 (25.1)
Capecitabine, oral140 (60.6)
Oxaliplatin combination22 (9.5)
Postoperative chemotherapy0.9330.869
Yes153 (66.2)
No78 (33.8)
Interval, w (%)0.0440.567
≤ 8 wk139 (60.2)
> 8 wk92 (39.8)
Surgical procedure0.1680.662
Miles (n, %)100 (43.3)
Dixon (n, %)113 (48.9)
Hartmann (n, %)18 (7.8)
LLND (n, %)21 (9.1)0.8680.994
Multivisceral resection (n, %)12 (5.2)0.0250.948
Preoperative CEA (μg/L)0.3440.663
< 5166 (71.9)
≥ 565 (28.1)
PNI (n, %)< 0.001< 0.001
Yes54 (23.4)
No177 (76.6)
Intravascular tumor embolus (n, %)< 0.0010.004
Yes28 (12.1)
No203 (87.9)
Degree of differentiation, n (%) 0.0280.152
Low and low-middle grades 32 (13.9)
Middle, high-middle, and high grades 193 (83.5)
Signet-ring and mucinous adenocarcinoma6 (2.6)
Table 5 Results of Cox regression analysis of disease-free survival and overall survival

Disease-free survival
Overall survival
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
cN0 vs cN10.6200.7940.318-1.9780.8010.840.217-3.249
cN0 vs cN20.4961.2810.628-2.6100.2961.7120.625-4.693
ypT0 vs ypT4< 0.0010.0740.019-0.2880.0110.110.02-0.607
ypT1 vs ypT40.3380.460.094-2.2530.4940.4640.051-4.202
ypT2 vs ypT4< 0.0010.0970.032-0.3010.0020.0350.004-0.305
ypT3 vs ypT40.0140.4180.209-0.8370.0110.3090.125-0.761
ypN0 vs ypN10.7450.8230.254-2.6640.8051.2450.219-7.086
ypN0 vs ypN20.7061.1780.504-2.7560.8161.1560.341-3.92
TLN (≥ 12 vs < 12 < 0.0010.3020.172-0.5310.6060.80.342-1.871
LNR (≤ 0.03 vs 0.03)0.8400.9140.379-2.200.7681.2280.314-4.799
Positive lymph nodes (≥ 2 vs < 2)0.8281.10.466-2.5930.9780.9820.271-3.562
Interval (≤ 8 wk vs > 8 wk)0.2361.3690.814-2.3030.6260.8360.408-1.715
Multivisceral resection0.1191.8750.851-4.130.7920.8160.181-3.69
PNI0.0511.80.998-3.2480.0023.7471.634-8.592
Intravascular tumor embolus0.2441.4790.766-2.8580.5841.2920.517-3.23
Degree of differentiation
Low and low-middle grades vs signet-ring and mucinous adenocarcinoma0.6950.7390.163-3.3540.8110.760.08-7.221
Middle, high-middle, and high grades vs signet-ring and mucinous adenocarcinoma0.9290.9300.19-4.5640.9131.1410.106-12.243