Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2020; 8(23): 5988-5998
Published online Dec 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5988
Table 1 Clinical data of children with ingested magnetic foreign bodies at admission
n = 56Proportion (Intragroup proportion)1
The time of ingestion can be confirmed4580.4%
< 3 d(33)(73.3%)
3-14 d(7)(15.6)
> 14 d(5)(11.1)
Unable to determine the time of ingestion1119.6%
Having gastrointestinal symptoms(9)(81.8%)
Having no gastrointestinal symptoms(2)(18.2%)
Admission symptoms
Abdominal pain (crying)610.7%
Abdominal pain (crying) and vomiting1526.8%
Abdominal pain (crying), vomiting, and fever35.4%
Shock23.6%
No symptoms3053.6%
Table 2 Cases experiencing self-discharge of magnetic foreign bodies
Cases without gastroscope, without surgery, whose all magnetic foreign bodies were discharged by themselves
No.Age (yr)DBIG (day)NIMType of magnet
143, 612Disk magnet
2533Magnetic bead
3554Magnetic bead
4624Magnetic bead
5722Magnetic bead
6817Magnetic bead
7832Strip magnet
81022Magnetic bead
Cases of intestinal magnetic residue after gastroscopy, which were discharged by themselves
No.Age (yr)DBIG (d) DBGD (d)NIM/NIMRType of magnet
1102/13/1Magnetic bead
2135/44/2Magnetic bead
Table 3 List of perforation positions caused by magnetic foreign bodies in children
Positionn = 36Proportion (%)
Small intestine-small intestine1541.7
Stomach-small intestine822.2
Small intestine-colon411.1
Duodenum-small intestine38.3
Stomach-colon25.6
Duodenum-colon25.6
Stomach-small intestine - colon12.8
Esophagus-trachea112.8
Esophagus-stomach12.8%