Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2020; 8(12): 2494-2501
Published online Jun 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2494
Table 1 Voiding diary results at baseline vs test period in eight patients
CaseResidual urine (mL)
Average voiding volume (mL)
Maximum voiding volume (mL)
QoL score
BaselineTest periodBaselineTest periodBaselineTest periodBaselineTest period
125020050707010055
22001008010010015054
3300250601008015055
450307010010015065
515013050908012055
6605015014020020044
725025012013015015044
810010017017020020044
Table 2 Voiding diary results at baseline vs test period in 46 patients
BaselineTest periodP valueZ value
Residual urine (mL)60 (0-200)15 (0-82.5)< 0.01-4.03
Voiding frequency13.74 ± 5.859.32 ± 2.73< 0.01
Average voiding volume (mL)114.84 ± 53.23184.35 ± 55.31< 0.01
Maximum voiding volume (mL)160 (120-200)260 (200-300)< 0.01-5.1
Nocturia3 (2-5)2 (1-3)< 0.01-4.67
Urgency score3 (0-4)2 (0-2)< 0.01-4.2
QoL score5 (3.25-5)3.5 (3-4)< 0.05-1.98
Table 3 Voiding diary results in the test period vs the latest follow-up time in 46 patients
Test periodThe latest follow-up timeP valueZ value
Residual urine (mL)15 (0-82.5)0 (0-70)< 0.01-3.28
Voiding frequency10 (7-10)8.5 (6.75-10)> 0.05-1.68
Average voiding volume (mL)190 (150-210)200 (155-240)> 0.05-0.98
Maximum voiding volume (mL)260 (200-300)255 (220-300)> 0.05-0.72
Nocturia2 (1-3)2 (1-2.63)> 0.05-0.03
Urgency score2 (0-2)2 (0-2)< 0.05-2.23
QoL score3.5 (3-4)4 (2-5)> 0.05-1.08