Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2020; 8(12): 2464-2472
Published online Jun 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2464
Published online Jun 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2464
Type | Advantages | Shortcomings | Applications |
CT-based navigation | High resolution; preoperative planning and simulation | No real-time imaging; expensive | Spinal pedicle screw implantation; hip and knee replacement |
2D-fluoroscopic navigation | Latest image obtained at any time; low cost | Image distortion | Fracture reduction and internal fixation |
3D-fluoroscopic navigation | High-resolution three-dimensional image data; real-time high-definition visualization of trajectory | Easy to be occluded by objects during operation; more X-ray needed | Reduction and internal fixation of complex fracture |
Imageless navigation | No requirement for image registration | Anatomic markers to be exposed; limited reconstruction of bone structure | Hip and knee surgery |
Electromagnetic navigation | High resolution for soft tissue; no need for a direct line of sight | A stable magnetic field needed | Orthopedic tumor; orthopedic minimally invasive treatment |
Ultrasound-based navigation | No radiation | Immature technology | Further improvement needed |
- Citation: Yu T, Cheng XL, Qu Y, Dong RP, Kang MY, Zhao JW. Computer navigation-assisted minimally invasive percutaneous screw placement for pelvic fractures. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(12): 2464-2472
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i12/2464.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2464