Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2020; 8(11): 2227-2234
Published online Jun 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i11.2227
Published online Jun 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i11.2227
Table 1 Baseline characteristics, n (%)
Baseline characteristic | Reference group (n = 40) | Observation group (n = 46) | t | P value |
Gender | ||||
Male | 22 (55.00) | 27 (58.70) | 0.279 | 0.597 |
Female | 18 (45.00) | 19 (41.30) | ||
Age (yr) | 56.32 ± 4.52 | 57.02 ± 4.81 | 0.692 | 0.491 |
Table 2 Comparison of serum tumor markers in patients with malignant lesions (mean ± SD)
Group | No. of malignant cases | CA125 (U/mL) | CA19-9 (U/mL) | SCC (ng/mL) | NSE (ng/mL) |
Reference | 37 | 23.25 ± 3.51 | 13.52 ± 2.25 | 1.31 ± 0.22 | 12.32 ± 2.63 |
Observation | 35 | 21.85 ± 3.25 | 12.74 ± 2.36 | 1.27 ± 0.24 | 11.56 ± 2.31 |
t | - | 1.753 | 1.436 | 0.738 | 1.305 |
P value | - | 0.084 | 0.156 | 0.463 | 0.192 |
Table 3 Comparison of intraoperative bleeding volume, the number of resected lymph nodes, and drainage volume (mean ± SD)
Group | n | Intraoperative bleeding volume (mL) | No. of resected lymph nodes | Drainage volume (mL) |
Reference | 40 | 153.21 ± 30.25 | 11.61 ± 2.03 | 948.63 ± 120.14 |
Observation | 46 | 63.88 ± 10.41 | 11.96 ± 2.16 | 571.85 ± 74.25 |
t | - | 18.803 | 0.771 | 17.737 |
P value | - | 0.001 | 0.443 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of hospital stay, treatment cost, drainage time, and visual analogue scale score (mean ± SD)
Group | n | Hospital stay (d) | Drainage time (d) | Treatment cost (× 104 Yuan) | VAS (score) |
Observation | 46 | 10.62 ± 1.01 | 3.59 ± 0.86 | 4.92 ± 0.85 | 4.02 ± 1.03 |
Reference | 40 | 12.52 ± 1.58 | 4.97 ± 1.02 | 4.89 ± 0.80 | 5.63 ± 1.35 |
t | - | 6.730 | 6.807 | 0.168 | 6.146 |
P value | - | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.867 | 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of postoperative lung function (mean ± SD, %)
Lung function index | Observation group (n = 46) | Reference group (n = 40) | t | P value |
FEV1% | ||||
Preoperative | 94.63 ± 3.05 | 93.94 ± 3.12 | 1.035 | 0.304 |
Postoperative | 84.69 ± 4.06a | 76.97 ± 5.06a | 7.845 | 0.001 |
FVC% | ||||
Preoperative | 94.12 ± 3.16 | 94.33 ± 3.21 | 0.305 | 0.761 |
Postoperative | 84.08 ± 3.09a | 75.85 ± 4.31a | 10.040 | 0.001 |
FEV1/FVC | ||||
Preoperative | 94.38 ± 2.56 | 94.14 ± 3.86 | 0.334 | 0.738 |
Postoperative | 84.39 ± 3.69a | 76.41 ± 4.51a | 9.022 | 0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of complications, n (%)
Group | No. | Acute pain | Infection | Repeated bleeding | Incidence of complications |
Observation | 46 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.17) | 1 (2.17) |
Reference | 40 | 2 (5.00) | 1 (2.50) | 1 (2.50) | 4 (10.00) |
χ2 | - | 5.128 | 2.532 | 0.024 | 5.364 |
P value | - | 0.024 | 0.112 | 0.877 | 0.021 |
- Citation: Li H, Liu Y, Ling BC, Hu B. Efficacy of thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy for small pulmonary nodules. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(11): 2227-2234
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i11/2227.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i11.2227