Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2019; 7(16): 2269-2286
Published online Aug 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2269
Published online Aug 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2269
Table 1 Studies about the advantages and results of surveillance in HCC
Ref. | Location | Inclusion period | n | Screening (%) | Results surveillance group |
UNI/MULTI | |||||
Edenvik et al[21] | Sweden UNI | 2005-2012 | 616 | 22% | Better survival |
van Meer et al[22] | Netherlands MULTI | 2005-2012 | 1074 | 27% | Smaller tumor size, earlier tumor stage, more often curative treatment and improving 1, 3, 5 years survival rates |
Singal et al[23] | United States MULTI | 2012-2013 | 374 | 42% | Early tumor detection and improved survival |
Mittal et al[24] | United States MULTI | 2005-2010 | 887 | 46.5% | Reduction in mortality |
Atiq et al[25] | United States UNI | 2010-2013 | 680 | 11.5% | Early HCC |
Table 2 Annual incidence of HCC in cirrhotic patients by etiology
Ref. | Location | n | Follow-up period | Study design | Incidence |
UNI/MULTI | |||||
Tansel et al[42] | North America, Europe, Asia, Australia. MULTI | 6528 | Median 8 yr | Meta-analysis | 1.007% (95%CI: 0.69–1.47) |
Fattovich et al[43] | Europe MULTI | 297 | Median 66 yr | Retrospective | 2.2% for hepatitis B virus and 2.5% for hepatitis C virus |
Mancebo et al[44] | Spain UNI | 450 | Median 42 mo | Prospective | 2.6% |
Shibuya et al[45] | Japan MULTI | 396 (134 stage III or IV) | Median 43 mo | Prospective | 1.5% for PBC stage III/IV |
Table 3 Annual HCC incidence in cirrhotic patients with HCV
Ref. | Location | n | Follow-up period | Study design | Incidence |
UNI/MULTI | |||||
Li et al[55] | US MULTI | 17836 | Median 2719.2 d in patients treated with IFN, and 396.4 d for the ones treated with DAAs | Retrospective | Annual incidence in cirrhotic patients 2.28% treated with DAA and 2.12% in patients treated with IFN. Annual incidence in patients with no treatment of 4.531% |
Piñero et al[57] | Latin America MULTI | 1400 | Median 16 mo | Prospective | Accumulated incidence in cirrhotic patients of 3% at 1 year and 6% at 2 yr |
Waziry et al[59] | Europe, Asia, North America, South America MULTI | 11523 | Median 5.5 yr in patients treated with IFN and 1 yr in patients treated with DAA | Meta-analysis | Annual incidence 1.14% in patients with SVR treated with IFN and 2.96% in patients SVR treated with DAA. After adjusting for age and follow-up period, no greater risk is observed in those treated with DAA |
Nahon et al[63] | France Multi | 1270 | Median 67.5 mo | Prospective | 2.6% in cirrhotic patients in SVR with DAA. In patients with SVR the annual incidence is 12% |
Table 4 Findings for HCC diagnosis
Vascular phase (CT/MRI) | Feature | Comments |
Late arterial phase | Arterial phase hyperenhancement also known as "wash-in" | The lesion must be hypervascular with an enhancing part higher in attenuation or intensity than the liver, depicting a nonrim-like enhancement unequivocally greater in whole or in part of the lesion than the surrounding liver parenchyma |
Portal phase or late venous phase | Washout | The lesion will present lower contrast uptake than the surrounding parenchyma |
"Capsule appearance" | A ring of peripheral uptake in the lesion |
Table 5 Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic table
Nonrim-like APHE | ||
Observation size | 10-19 mm | ≥ 20 mm |
Enhancing "capsule" | LR-4 | LR-5 |
Non-peripheral washout or threshold grown | LR-5 | LR-5 |
Table 6 Ancillary findings (LIRADS 2018)
Favoring HCC in particular | Favoring malignancy in general | Favoring benignity |
Non-enhancing "capsule" | US visibility as discrete nodule | Size stability > 2 yr |
Nodule-in-nodule | Subthreshold growth | Size reduction |
Mosaic architecture | Restricted diffusion | Parallels blood pool |
Blood products in mass | Mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity | Marked T2 hyperintensity |
Fat in mass, more than adjacent liver | Fat sparing in solid mass | Undistorted vessels |
Iron sparing in solid mass | Iron in mass, more than liver | |
Transitional phase hypointensity | Hepatobiliary phase isointensity | |
Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity | ||
Corona enhancement |
Table 7 LI-RADS 2018 recommendations for untreated ≥ 1 cm lesions without pathologic proof in patients at high risk for HCC
LR-NC | Cannot be categorized (image degradation, lack of key phases) |
LR-1 | Definitely benign (e.g., cyst, hemangioma, perfusion alteration) |
LR-2 | Probably benign (probable but no definitive LR-1 findings) |
LR-3 | Intermediate probability of malignancy (nonmalignant and malignant entities each have moderate probability) |
LR-4 | High probability but no certainty of HCC |
LR-5 | Definitively HCC |
LR-M | Probably or definitely malignant, not HCC specific (e.g., HCC not meeting LR-5 criteria, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastases to liver) |
LR-TIV | Tumor in vein |
- Citation: Pascual S, Miralles C, Bernabé JM, Irurzun J, Planells M. Surveillance and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(16): 2269-2286
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v7/i16/2269.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2269