Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2016; 4(10): 351-355
Published online Oct 16, 2016. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i10.351
Published online Oct 16, 2016. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i10.351
Table 1 Demographic and HLA data
Age/gender | Blood group | Weight (kg) | HLA | ||||||||||||||
A | B | Bw | Cw | DR B1 | DRB3,4,5 | DQ B1 | |||||||||||
Patient 1 | 26/male | A+ | 37 | 3 | 32 | 40 | - | 6 | - | 3 | 15 | 4 | 10 | 53 | - | 5 | 8 |
Donor 1 | 25/female/wife | A+ | 65 | 3 | 24 | 40 | 58 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 17 | 11 | 52 | - | 2 | 7 |
Patient 2 | 51/male | B+ | 60 | 2 | - | 40 | - | 6 | - | 15 | - | 10 | - | - | - | 5 | - |
Donor 2 | 45/female/wife | A+ | 2 | 26 | 8 | 40 | 6 | - | 7 | 15 | 10 | 17 | 52 | - | 5 | 2 | |
Patient 3 | 52/male | A+ | 52 | 2 | 3 | 44 | 56 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 52 | 53 | 2 | 5 |
Donor 3 | 45/female/wife | B+ | 70 | 2 | 31 | 40 | 55 | 6 | - | 1 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 51 | 52 | 6 | - |
Table 2 Immunologic data in patient 1 and our cost of immune monitoring and desensitization therapy
Patient 1 | Before desensitization | After desensitization |
With wife donor | ||
DSA (MFI) | A24-4924, B58-9767, DR11-13112, DR17-13598, DQ7-13194, DQ2-14751 | A24-1000, B58-7055, DR11-4296, DR17-1925, DQ7-11838, DQ2-2410 |
AHG-CDC LCM (%) | 80 | 20 |
T FCM (MCS) | 212 | Negative |
B-FCM (MCS) | 504 | 328 |
With KPD donor | ||
DSA (MFI) | B8, 6830: DR 17, 14751: DQ2, 13112 | B8, 2400: DR 17, 1925: |
DQ2, 2410 | ||
AHG-CDC (%) | 20 | 17 |
T-FCM (MCS) | 88 | Negative |
B-FCM (MCS) | 335 | 190 |
The cost of immune monitoring and desensitization therapy (USD) | ||
AHG-CDC LCM | 20 | |
T and B FCM | 100 | |
DSA ( Luminexx, qualitative) | 40 | |
DSA ( Luminexx, quantitative) | 425 | |
HLA (class 1 and 2) | 200 | |
Plasmapheresis | 300 | |
Bortezomib (Baximib, Ranbaxy) 2 mg | 60 | |
IVIg (Plasmaglob, Plasmagen) 5 gm | 125 | |
Rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (Thymoglobulin, Genzyme-Sanofi) 25 mg | 200 | |
Valganciclovir (Cymgal, Biocon) 450 mg | 3 | |
Methyl prednisolone ( Solumedrol, Pfizer) 125 mg | 4 |
Table 3 Pre-transplantation and surgical data and outcome
Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | |
Cause of ESRD | Chronic glomerulonephritis | Hypertension | Hypertension |
Dialysis duration (mo) | 24 | 6 | 6 |
KPD waiting time (mo) | 6 | 2 | 2 |
Warm ischemia time (s) | 120 | 157 | 180 |
Cold ischemia time (min) | 90 | 67 | 30 |
Anastomosis time (min) | 22 | 23 | 25 |
Intra-operative urine output (mL) | 800 | 1500 | 700 |
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rejection/ complications | No | No | No |
Creatinine at discharge (mg/dL) | 1 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Creatinine at 24 mo (mg/dL) | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
- Citation: Kute VB, Patel HV, Shah PR, Modi PR, Shah VR, Rizvi SJ, Pal BC, Modi MP, Shah PS, Varyani UT, Wakhare PS, Shinde SG, Ghodela VA, Patel MH, Trivedi VB, Trivedi HL. Increasing access to kidney transplantation for sensitized recipient through three-way kidney paired donation with desensitization: The first Indian report. World J Clin Cases 2016; 4(10): 351-355
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v4/i10/351.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v4.i10.351