Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 16, 2014; 2(12): 873-882
Published online Dec 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.873
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
ECRSwNPNECRSwNP
n (%)27 (45%)33 (55%)
Age (yr), mean ± SD46.93 ± 12.3540.27 ± 13.47
M/F20/724/9
With AR (%)74.10%48.5%
With asthma (%)18.50%12.1%
Duration of symptom (yr)5.50 ± 3.928.55 ± 6.93
VAS4.04 ± 1.013.99 ± 1.09
Score of olfactory dysfunction5.59 ± 2.545.21 ± 2.66
Score of polyps3.59 ± 1.11b2.06 ± 0.82
Incidence of bilateral polyps92.6%b39.9%
Score of disease on CT14.42 ± 3.84b9.64 ± 3.37
Serum IgE (kU/L)236.72 ± 157.77167.97 ± 176.77
Blood eosinophil count (× 109/L)0.44 ± 0.24b0.21 ± 0.11
Blood eosinophil percentage (%)6.49 ± 3.27b3.42 ± 1.87
Tissue eosinophil count/HPF31.56 ± 21.37b0.91 ± 0.80
Table 2 Computed tomography features of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
ECRSwNP(n = 27)NECRSwNP(n = 33)
Total disease score of sinuses14.42 ± 3.84b9.64 ± 3.37
Number of involved sinuses7.88 ± 1.22b5.64 ± 1.49
Percentage of involvement in all sinuses23.1%a3.0%
Incidence of bilateral diseases in individual sinuses
Frontal53.8%b12.1%
Sphenoid38.5%a9.1%
Anterior ethmoid53.8%a12.1%
Posterior ethmoid100.0%b75.8%
Maxillary96.2%a69.7%
OMC69.2%a36.4%
Score of diseases in individual sinuses
Frontal1.81 ± 1.51a0.88 ± 0.91
Sphenoid1.23 ± 1.28a0.55 ± 0.76
Anterior ethmoid3.27 ± 0.90b2.27 ± 0.87
Posterior ethmoid3.04 ± 1.04b1.52 ± 0.95
Maxillary2.23 ± 0.432.15 ± 0.69
OMC2.85 ± 1.602.27 ± 1.20
Table 3 Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of blood eosinophil count or percentage for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis
Ref.Blood eosinophil count
Blood eosinophil percentage
AUCCutoff valueSensitivitySpecificityAUCCutoff valueSensitivitySpecificity
Zuo et al[52]0.8730.16 × 109/L84.9%84.4%0.8632.05%89.0%84.4%
Wang et al[9]----0.8185.65%79.0%78.2%
Hu et al[11]0.8710.22 × 109/L74.2%86.5%0.8643.05%80.3%75.3%
Sakuma et al[13]----0.8806.00%97.4%70.7%